sample_embedding_folder2/0762306.txt

Ticket Name: TDA2: Use-case Development for Cascaded Radar Design

Query Text:
Part Number: TDA2 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AWR1243 Hello, I am trying to understand the fundamental differences between different use-case and develop my own use-case for my application. In the use-case "multi_radar_capture_fft_display," you have used 'ISSCapture' algorithm process to collect CSI-2 data from AWR1243 radar sensor. However, in the use-case "cascade_radar_object_detect", you have used "Capture" algorithm process to collect CSI-2 radar data. What is the fundamental difference between these two processes? Is there any advantage of using one over another? I look forward to your reply. Thank you! Best Regards, Nishant

Responses:
Hi Nishant, ISSCapture is using CAL driver to capture the data in the underlying link. "Capture" is using VIP driver to capture the data in the underlying link. The choice is based on how the AWR1243 is connected to the TDA (via CSI/CAL or via VIP (parallel)). Thanks and Regards, Piyali