--- title: SacreBLEU emoji: 🤗 colorFrom: blue colorTo: red sdk: gradio sdk_version: 3.0.2 app_file: app.py pinned: false tags: - evaluate - metric --- # Metric Card for SacreBLEU ## Metric Description SacreBLEU provides hassle-free computation of shareable, comparable, and reproducible BLEU scores. Inspired by Rico Sennrich's `multi-bleu-detok.perl`, it produces the official Workshop on Machine Translation (WMT) scores but works with plain text. It also knows all the standard test sets and handles downloading, processing, and tokenization. See the [README.md] file at https://github.com/mjpost/sacreBLEU for more information. ## How to Use This metric takes a set of predictions and a set of references as input, along with various optional parameters. ```python >>> predictions = ["hello there general kenobi", "foo bar foobar"] >>> references = [["hello there general kenobi", "hello there !"], ... ["foo bar foobar", "foo bar foobar"]] >>> sacrebleu = evaluate.load("sacrebleu") >>> results = sacrebleu.compute(predictions=predictions, ... references=references) >>> print(list(results.keys())) ['score', 'counts', 'totals', 'precisions', 'bp', 'sys_len', 'ref_len'] >>> print(round(results["score"], 1)) 100.0 ``` ### Inputs - **`predictions`** (`list` of `str`): list of translations to score. Each translation should be tokenized into a list of tokens. - **`references`** (`list` of `list` of `str`): A list of lists of references. The contents of the first sub-list are the references for the first prediction, the contents of the second sub-list are for the second prediction, etc. Note that there must be the same number of references for each prediction (i.e. all sub-lists must be of the same length). - **`smooth_method`** (`str`): The smoothing method to use, defaults to `'exp'`. Possible values are: - `'none'`: no smoothing - `'floor'`: increment zero counts - `'add-k'`: increment num/denom by k for n>1 - `'exp'`: exponential decay - **`smooth_value`** (`float`): The smoothing value. Only valid when `smooth_method='floor'` (in which case `smooth_value` defaults to `0.1`) or `smooth_method='add-k'` (in which case `smooth_value` defaults to `1`). - **`tokenize`** (`str`): Tokenization method to use for BLEU. If not provided, defaults to `'zh'` for Chinese, `'ja-mecab'` for Japanese and `'13a'` (mteval) otherwise. Possible values are: - `'none'`: No tokenization. - `'zh'`: Chinese tokenization. - `'13a'`: mimics the `mteval-v13a` script from Moses. - `'intl'`: International tokenization, mimics the `mteval-v14` script from Moses - `'char'`: Language-agnostic character-level tokenization. - `'ja-mecab'`: Japanese tokenization. Uses the [MeCab tokenizer](https://pypi.org/project/mecab-python3). - **`lowercase`** (`bool`): If `True`, lowercases the input, enabling case-insensitivity. Defaults to `False`. - **`force`** (`bool`): If `True`, insists that your tokenized input is actually detokenized. Defaults to `False`. - **`use_effective_order`** (`bool`): If `True`, stops including n-gram orders for which precision is 0. This should be `True`, if sentence-level BLEU will be computed. Defaults to `False`. ### Output Values - `score`: BLEU score - `counts`: Counts - `totals`: Totals - `precisions`: Precisions - `bp`: Brevity penalty - `sys_len`: predictions length - `ref_len`: reference length The output is in the following format: ```python {'score': 39.76353643835252, 'counts': [6, 4, 2, 1], 'totals': [10, 8, 6, 4], 'precisions': [60.0, 50.0, 33.333333333333336, 25.0], 'bp': 1.0, 'sys_len': 10, 'ref_len': 7} ``` The score can take any value between `0.0` and `100.0`, inclusive. #### Values from Popular Papers ### Examples ```python >>> predictions = ["hello there general kenobi", ... "on our way to ankh morpork"] >>> references = [["hello there general kenobi", "hello there !"], ... ["goodbye ankh morpork", "ankh morpork"]] >>> sacrebleu = evaluate.load("sacrebleu") >>> results = sacrebleu.compute(predictions=predictions, ... references=references) >>> print(list(results.keys())) ['score', 'counts', 'totals', 'precisions', 'bp', 'sys_len', 'ref_len'] >>> print(round(results["score"], 1)) 39.8 ``` ## Limitations and Bias Because what this metric calculates is BLEU scores, it has the same limitations as that metric, except that sacreBLEU is more easily reproducible. ## Citation ```bibtex @inproceedings{post-2018-call, title = "A Call for Clarity in Reporting {BLEU} Scores", author = "Post, Matt", booktitle = "Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Research Papers", month = oct, year = "2018", address = "Belgium, Brussels", publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", url = "https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-6319", pages = "186--191", } ``` ## Further References - See the [sacreBLEU README.md file](https://github.com/mjpost/sacreBLEU) for more information.