add latest report demo

reports/DEMO_REPORT.qmd

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
----
-title: "Semantic Data Catalogue"
-format: 
-  PrettyPDF-pdf:
-        papersize: A4
-execute:
-  freeze: auto
-  echo: false
-monofont: 'JetBrains Mono'
-monofontoptions: 
-  - Scale=0.55
----
-
-# Summary
-
-The responses to the local government planning application reveal a diverse range of opinions regarding development in the Cambridge area. A significant number of respondents express concerns about infrastructure inadequacies, particularly in relation to traffic, healthcare, and education, indicating that any new developments should be contingent upon improvements in these areas [5][18][21]. There is a strong emphasis on the preservation of open spaces and rural character, with many opposing developments that threaten these aspects [12][13][20]. Additionally, the need for sustainable practices is highlighted, with calls for prioritizing renewable energy and low carbon initiatives in planning policies [2][3][4]. 
-
-Conversely, several responses advocate for the development of vibrant city districts, particularly east of Milton Road, emphasizing the importance of community facilities, green spaces, and sustainable transport options [8][10][19]. Supporters of development also stress the need for affordable housing and the enhancement of local services to accommodate growing populations [11][14][19]. However, there is a notable skepticism regarding the necessity of additional housing linked to infrastructure projects like the East-West Rail, with some respondents questioning the overall benefits of such developments [9][12][20].
-
-# Key points raised in support
-
-Support: 8
-
-* Development of vibrant city districts with community facilities and green spaces [8][10][19].
-* Emphasis on sustainable transport solutions and non-car transport options [19].
-* Advocacy for affordable housing to meet local needs [10][19].
-* Support for the expansion of the Cambridge Biomedical Campus [8][11].
-* Recognition of the importance of local green spaces and community amenities [6][14][15].
-* Desire for a circular economy and active transport initiatives [8][10].
-* Support for the designation of Local Green Spaces to preserve community character [6].
-* Vision for a car-free Greater Cambridge by 2041 [8][19].
-
-# Key points raised in opposition
-
-Opposed: 13
-
-* Concerns about insufficient infrastructure to support increased population [5][18][21].
-* Opposition to developments that threaten open spaces and rural character [12][13][20].
-* Critique of policies that impose inflexible rules on renewable energy development [2][3][4].
-* Skepticism about the benefits of the East-West Rail as merely a housing enabler [12][20].
-* Advocacy for prioritizing brownfield site development over greenfield sites [20].
-* Calls for limited development in villages without adequate local services [16][18].
-* Emphasis on the need for environmental protection and biodiversity [20].
-* Concerns about traffic issues and the impact of overdevelopment on local communities [9][12][18].
-* Opposition to the separation distance policy for wind turbines, arguing it contradicts national guidelines [3][4].
-* Advocacy for flexibility in decommissioning policies for renewable projects [2].
-* Concerns about the impact of development on local wildlife and ecosystems [12].
-* Desire to maintain the character and beauty of Cambridge amidst urban expansion [21].
-* Calls for a more equitable distribution of housing development across villages [20].
-
-# Thematic breakdown
-
-- Infrastructure concerns: 38% (8 responses)
-- Environmental protection: 33% (7 responses)
-- Community facilities and amenities: 38% (8 responses)
-- Renewable energy and sustainability: 19% (4 responses)
-- Urban development and housing: 43% (9 responses)
-- Rural preservation: 29% (6 responses)
-- Traffic and transportation: 24% (5 responses)

reports/_extensions/nrennie/PrettyPDF/PrettyPDF.tex

@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
      }%
      % logo
     \AtPageLowerLeft{% start the bar at the bottom right of the page
-        \put(\LenToUnit{\dimexpr\paperwidth-2.5cm},27.2cm){% move it to the top right
-            \color{light}\includegraphics[width=2cm]{_extensions/nrennie/PrettyPDF/logo.png}
+        \put(\LenToUnit{\dimexpr\paperwidth-2.75cm},27.2cm){% move it to the top right
+            \color{light}\includegraphics[width=2.5cm]{_extensions/nrennie/PrettyPDF/logo.png}
           }%
      }%
 }