initial model card
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
|
3 |
+
tags:
|
4 |
+
- feature-extraction
|
5 |
+
- sentence-similarity
|
6 |
+
language:
|
7 |
+
- de
|
8 |
+
- en
|
9 |
+
- es
|
10 |
+
- fr
|
11 |
+
- it
|
12 |
+
- nl
|
13 |
+
- ja
|
14 |
+
- pt
|
15 |
+
- zh
|
16 |
+
---
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
# Model Card for `vectorizer.raspberry`
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
This model is a vectorizer developed by Sinequa. It produces an embedding vector given a passage or a query. The
|
21 |
+
passage vectors are stored in our vector index and the query vector is used at query time to look up relevant passages
|
22 |
+
in the index.
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
Model name: `vectorizer.raspberry`
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
+
## Supported Languages
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+
The model was trained and tested in the following languages:
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
- English
|
31 |
+
- French
|
32 |
+
- German
|
33 |
+
- Spanish
|
34 |
+
- Italian
|
35 |
+
- Dutch
|
36 |
+
- Japanese
|
37 |
+
- Portuguese
|
38 |
+
- Chinese
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
Besides these languages, basic support can be expected for additional 91 languages that were used during the pretraining
|
41 |
+
of the base model (see Appendix A of XLM-R paper).
|
42 |
+
|
43 |
+
## Scores
|
44 |
+
|
45 |
+
| Metric | Value |
|
46 |
+
|:-----------------------|------:|
|
47 |
+
| Relevance (Recall@100) | 0.613 |
|
48 |
+
|
49 |
+
Note that the relevance score is computed as an average over 14 retrieval datasets (see
|
50 |
+
[details below](#evaluation-metrics)).
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
## Inference Times
|
53 |
+
|
54 |
+
| GPU | Batch size 1 (at query time) | Batch size 32 (at indexing) |
|
55 |
+
|:-----------|-----------------------------:|----------------------------:|
|
56 |
+
| NVIDIA A10 | 2 ms | 19 ms |
|
57 |
+
| NVIDIA T4 | 4 ms | 52 ms |
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
+
The inference times only measure the time the model takes to process a single batch, it does not include pre- or
|
60 |
+
post-processing steps like the tokenization.
|
61 |
+
|
62 |
+
## Requirements
|
63 |
+
|
64 |
+
- Minimal Sinequa version: 11.10.0
|
65 |
+
- GPU memory usage: 610 MiB
|
66 |
+
|
67 |
+
Note that GPU memory usage only includes how much GPU memory the actual model consumes on an NVIDIA T4 GPU with a batch
|
68 |
+
size of 32. It does not include the fix amount of memory that is consumed by the ONNX Runtime upon initialization which
|
69 |
+
can be around 0.5 to 1 GiB depending on the used GPU.
|
70 |
+
|
71 |
+
## Model Details
|
72 |
+
|
73 |
+
### Overview
|
74 |
+
|
75 |
+
- Number of parameters: 107 million
|
76 |
+
- Base language
|
77 |
+
model: [mMiniLMv2-L6-H384-distilled-from-XLMR-Large](https://huggingface.co/nreimers/mMiniLMv2-L6-H384-distilled-from-XLMR-Large) ([Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15828), [GitHub](https://github.com/microsoft/unilm/tree/master/minilm))
|
78 |
+
- Insensitive to casing and accents
|
79 |
+
- Output dimensions: 256 (reduced with an additional dense layer)
|
80 |
+
- Training procedure: Query-passage-negative triplets for datasets that have mined hard negative data, Query-passage
|
81 |
+
pairs for the rest. Number of negatives is augmented with in-batch negative strategy
|
82 |
+
|
83 |
+
### Training Data
|
84 |
+
|
85 |
+
The model have been trained using all datasets that are cited in
|
86 |
+
the [all-MiniLM-L6-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2) model.
|
87 |
+
In addition to that, this model has been trained on the datasets cited
|
88 |
+
in [this paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.13897.pdf) on the 9 aforementioned languages.
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
### Evaluation Metrics
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
To determine the relevance score, we averaged the results that we obtained when evaluating on the datasets of the
|
93 |
+
[BEIR benchmark](https://github.com/beir-cellar/beir). Note that all these datasets are in English.
|
94 |
+
|
95 |
+
| Dataset | Recall@100 |
|
96 |
+
|:------------------|-----------:|
|
97 |
+
| Average | 0.613 |
|
98 |
+
| | |
|
99 |
+
| Arguana | 0.957 |
|
100 |
+
| CLIMATE-FEVER | 0.468 |
|
101 |
+
| DBPedia Entity | 0.377 |
|
102 |
+
| FEVER | 0.820 |
|
103 |
+
| FiQA-2018 | 0.639 |
|
104 |
+
| HotpotQA | 0.560 |
|
105 |
+
| MS MARCO | 0.845 |
|
106 |
+
| NFCorpus | 0.287 |
|
107 |
+
| NQ | 0.756 |
|
108 |
+
| Quora | 0.992 |
|
109 |
+
| SCIDOCS | 0.456 |
|
110 |
+
| SciFact | 0.906 |
|
111 |
+
| TREC-COVID | 0.100 |
|
112 |
+
| Webis-Touche-2020 | 0.413 |
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
We evaluated the model on the datasets of the [MIRACL benchmark](https://github.com/project-miracl/miracl) to test its
|
115 |
+
multilingual capacities. Note that not all training languages are part of the benchmark, so we only report the metrics
|
116 |
+
for the existing languages.
|
117 |
+
|
118 |
+
| Language | Recall@100 |
|
119 |
+
|:---------|-----------:|
|
120 |
+
| French | 0.650 |
|
121 |
+
| German | 0.528 |
|
122 |
+
| Spanish | 0.602 |
|
123 |
+
| Japanese | 0.614 |
|
124 |
+
| Chinese | 0.680 |
|