Category: mythology
Content: introduction
The Sacred Love Story
/L64627/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64625/L64626
Dance of Divine Love presents India’s classical sacred love story known
as the Rasa Lila.1It is a dramatic poem about young maidens joining
with their ideal beloved to perform the wondrous “circle dance of
love,” or Rasa. Its story is an expression of the eternal soul’s loving
union with the supreme deity in “divine play,” or Lila.T he Rasa Lila is
considered the ultimate message of one of India’s most treasured
scriptures, the Bhagavata Pur ana.2
The narrator of this story tells us that the highest devotional love
for God is attained when hearing or reciting the R asa Lila.U n d e n i -
ably, its charming poetic imagery, co mbined with deeply resonating
devotional motifs, expresses to any reader much about the nature of
love. Narrated in eloquently rich and ﬂowing Sanskrit verse, it hasbeen recognized as one of the most beautiful love poems ever written.
A DRAMA OF LOVE
The Rasa Lila is set in a sacred realm of enchantment in the land
known as Vraja, far beyond the universe, within the highest domain ofthe heavenly world. This sacred realm also imprints itself onto part ofour world as the earthly Vraja, a rural area known as Vraja Ma ndala
(“the circular area of Vraja”) in northern India, about eighty miles
1. The four-syllable phrase Rasa Lila (abbreviated as RL throughout this book) consists
of two Sanskrit words pronounced phonetically “Rah–suh Lee–lah” (“ah” as “a” in “father,”
“uh”as “u” in “sun,” and “ee” as in “see”). Deﬁnitions of key Sanskrit terms are listed in the
glossary. In Hindi, the second short syllable is dropped, resulting in the three-syllable
phrase “Rah-s Lee–lah.” In Bengali, the second syllable is also dropped, but pronounced
“Rah-sh Lee–lah.” The speciﬁc sacred text known as “R asa Lila” is to be distinguished from
the name used for the pilgrimage dramas of Vraja, known in Hindi as ras lila. Note that the
distinction is made clear in this work through the presentation of the latter term in lower-case italic letters, with the Hindi spelling. For pr oper pronunciation of transliterated words
from the Sanskrit language used throughout this book, please see the pronunciation table.
2. The words Bhagavata Pur ana mean “the timeless stories (Pur ana) about God (Bh a-
gavata).” The title for this most popular sacred text of India has two variations: Srimad Bha-
gavatam and Bhagavata Mah apur anam. It is often called simply the Bhagavata .A m o ng the
eighteen famous Pur anas, it is considered the most important, as will be discussed below.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
south of the modern capital city of Delhi.3Vraja is described as a land
of idyllic natural beauty, ﬁlled with abundant foliage heavy with fruit
and bloom, roaming cows, and brightly colored birds singing melodi-ously. The Rasa Lila takes place in the earthly Vraja during the boun-
tiful autumn season, when eve nings abound with soothing scents and
gentle river breezes. The following is a summary of the ﬁve chaptersof the R asa Lila story from the Bhagavata ’s tenth book.
One special evening, the rising moon reached its fullness with a re-
splendent glow. Its reddish rays lit up the forest as night-blooming lotusﬂowers began to unfold. The forest during those nights was decoratedprofusely with delicate starlike jasmine ﬂowers, resembling the ﬂowingdark hair of goddesses adorned with ﬂower blossoms. So rapturous wasthis setting that the supreme Lord himself, as Krishna, the eternallyyouthful cowherd, was compelled to play captivating music on his ﬂute.
Mov ed by this beauteous scene, Krishna was inspired toward love.
Upon hearing the alluring ﬂute music, the cowherd maidens,
known as the Gopis,
4who were already in love with Krishna, abruptly
left their homes, families, and domestic duties. They ran off to joinhim in the moonlit forest. Krishna and the Gop is met and played on
the banks of the Y amun aRiver. When the maidens became proud of
his loving attention, however, their beloved Lord suddenly vanishedfrom their sight. The Gop is searched everywhere for Krishna. Discov-
ering that he had run off with one special maiden, they soon foundthat she too had been deserted by him. As darkness engulfed the for-
est, the cowherd maidens gave up their search, singing sweet songs ofhope and despair, longing for his return. Then Krishna cleverly reap-peared and spoke to them on the nature of love.
The story culminates in the commencement of the R asa dance. The
Gop is link arms together, forming a great circle. By divine arrange-
ment, Krishna dances with every cowherd maiden at once, yet eachone thinks she is dancing with him alone. Supreme love has nowreached its perfect fulﬁllment and expression through joyous dancing
and singing long into the night, in the divine circle of the R asa. Retir-2Introduction
3. Vraja (commonly spelled and pronounced as the Hindi “Braj”) is a region covering
approximately 1,450 square miles. At the heart of Vraja is the forest village of Vrind avana,
the home of Krishna, and the city of Mathur a,K r ishna’s birthplace. Vrind avana is located
between Delhi and the city of Agra (the home of the Taj Mahal, about 34 miles to the
south). Throughout the R asa Lila passage, Vraja is interchangeable with and often refers to
Vrindavana; see RL 1.18–19.
4.Gopis is the plural of Gopi,“a female cowherd,” pronounced as the English word “go,”
and “-pi,” as the English word “pea.”
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
ing from the vigorous dancing, Krishna and the Gop is refresh them-
selves by bathing in the river. Then, reluctantly, the cowherd maidens
return to their homes.
A ﬁrst reading of the story might lead one to believe that an obses-
sive love and passion for Krishna consumed the cowherd maidens.Their love could appear selﬁsh and irresponsible, perhaps even un-ethical, as they abandoned their children, husbands, families, andhomes. A closer reading, however, r eveals the idealized vision of the
story intended by its author and embraced and expounded upon byvarious traditions, in which the passionate love of the Gop is becomes
the model, even the veritable symbol, of the highest, most intense de-votion to God.
Contrary interpretations may arise because the vision of God pre-
sented herein is intimate, esoteric, and complex, containing elementsthat are familiar to both Western and Indic religious traditions, aswell as those that are unfamiliar. Certainly, one can observe howKrishna is acknowledged within the text as being a sovereign deity—
a God of grace who teaches and redeems devoted souls, and who pos-sesses other mighty and divine attributes, characteristics one wouldexpect to ﬁnd in the divinity of Semitic traditions. But there is aunique vision presented in this dramat ic poem—a vision of the inner
life of the deity. Here, God is celebrated as an adorable, eternallyyouthful cowherd boy who plays the ﬂute and delights in amorous
dalliance with his dearest devotees.
In Indic traditions, the attainment of God is commonly believed to
be achieved through asceticism and renunciation. Y et such an unyield-
ing, self-imposed ren unciation for personal spiritual gain is not fa-
vored in the Bhagavata Pur ana, thus contrasting with the greater
tradition out of which it arises. Rather, the text promotes renun-
ciation that is naturally occurring and selﬂessly generated, sponta-
neously arising out of love. The cowherd maidens are considered tohave achieved the perfection of all asceticism and to have attained thehighest transcendence simply through their love and passionate devo-tion to God. This method of attainm ent is clearly distinct from the
rigorous asceticism and ceaseless search for world-denying transcen-
dence for which much of religious India is known.
Even though the divinely erotic tenor of the R asa Lila story has de-
lighted many, it has confused others. Some Western and even Indianinterpreters have assumed that the lo ve exhibited between the cow-
herd women and their beloved Krishna is nothing more than a displayDrama of Love 3
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
of worldly lust.5The author’s intention expressed in the text, however,
is quite the contrary—the hearing or reciting of this story, he pro-
claims, will freesouls from lust, the “disease of the heart.” Therefore
saintly voices from particular traditions within the Hindu complex ofreligion claim that its erotic imagery is an expression of the intensity
and intimacy of divine love, rather than a portrayal of worldly pas-sion. It is only a lack of enculturation and purity of heart on the partof the reader that prevents one from appreciating the R asa Lila as the
greatest revelation of love.
6
Such traditions tell us that the true interpretation of the story re-
quires a certain type of vision, the “eye of pure love,” prem a-netra,
which sees a world permeated by supreme love constantly celebratedby all beings and all of life.
7This eye beholds a realm of consummate
beauty and bliss, in which both the soul and intimate deity lose them-selves in the eternal play of love. Prem a-netra is said to be attained
when the “eye of devotion” is anointed with the “mystical ointment oflove,” an ointment that grants a speciﬁc vision of the “incomprehensi-ble qualities of the essential form of Krishna.”
8These traditions claim
that such qualities are revealed through the R asa Li latext, which, with4Introduction
5. The various interpretations of the R asa Lila story in the West as well as the East have
a long and interesting history, not within the scope of this study. My interest here is to pre-
pare the reader for appreciating the rich literary and religious dimensions of the text, andfor understanding aspects of the esoteric vision of its drama.
6. The modern exponent of Vaishnavism who spread the tradition worldwide, Bhakti-
vedanta Swami Prabhupada (1896–1977), cautioned outsiders or  nonpractitioners in their
reading of the stories of Krishna and the Gop is presented in his volume entitled, KRSNA:
The Supreme Personality of Godhead (Los Angeles: Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1970),
p.188ff., a retelling of the Bhagavata ’s tenth book, interpolated with his own grave warnings
against misinterpretation. It is important to point out that the Swami presented these sto-
ries of the Bhagavata to the modern Western world, a wo rld he encountered as having far
more promiscuity than the traditional Indian cult ure out of which he came. However, he
also battled the dark side, within his own culture, of radical heterodox Sahajiy atraditions
arising out of Bengal Vaishnavism. Such traditions had been inﬂuenced by tantric Buddhistpractices, in which practitioners, according to the Swami, lacked “requisite practice and
spiritual discipline in devotional love,” sadhana-bhakti, and thus the humility for truly un-
derstanding the Bhagavata ’s stories. At worst, some Sahajiy asects have attempted, to this
day, to reenact the divine acts of Krishna with the Gop is through sexual rituals. The per-
ception of orthodox Vaishnavas is that Sahajiy apractitioners dwell on the intimate divine
acts of God prematurely, taking the te achings cheaply or  sentimentally.
7. The phrase prem a-netra is taken from Krishnadasa Kaviraja’s great biographical and
theological exposition, Caitanya Caritamrta [CC] 1.5.21, in which he describes how the eye
of love can comprehend “the manif estations of divine essence,” or svarupa-prakasa.
8. These phrases and ideas are taken from a verse of the Shri Bra hma-Samhita (Madras:
Sree Gaudiya Math, 1958), v. 5.38. Translations are mine. The Brahma Samhita (BrS) was
discovered in south India and canonized by the bhakti saint Caitanya in the sixteenth cen-tury. Caitanya’s discovery of the BrS is related in CC 2.9.237–241.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
Drama of Love 5
Figure 2. The village of Bars anasurrounded by beautiful Vraja landscape.
Photograph courtesy of Helmut Kappel.
its sensuous spirituality and innocent play fulness set in alluring poetic
verse, ever beckons and attracts souls to enter into its drama.
This is the vision of saints, which I myself do not claim to possess.
As one who is Western-born and traine d in the academic study of reli-
gion, having had the privilege of living in India among saintly practi-
tioners and participating with them in de votional practices, however, I
am perhaps in a position to present this work to those both outside
and within these traditions. My intention is to illuminate a particulartradition’s special vision of such an important text, thereby facilitating
further dialogue with other world traditions of theistic mysticism.
This work, then, explores a vision of intimacy with the supreme
deity as presented by the R asa Lila text and elaborated upon by recog-
nized sages possessing this eye of love. The translation of the story,found at the heart of the book, is intended to be literal and faithful,striving to capture some of the ex quisite poetic beauty and profound
theological expression of the original. Within the introductory andcommentarial sections that frame the tr anslation, deeper or more
hidden meanings of its verses are presented through general discus-sion and speciﬁc verse comments. It is hoped that these key teachingsand traditional commentaries, from one of the most inﬂuential tradi-tions interpreting the text, will enrich the reading of this masterpieceof world literature and enhance its appreciation.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
SACRED LOVE STORIES
Among all love stories of the world, only a few are considered divine
revelation. Certain mystical traditions honor a particular love story as
their ultimate vision of supreme love. These stories exhibit eroticlongings, often in the feminine voice, as can be observed in the fol-lowing similar expressions of passion presented in two very differentscriptural texts, the ﬁrst biblical and the second pur anic: “Let him kiss
me with the kisses of his mouth!” (Song of Solomon 1.2), and “Pleasebestow upon us the nectar of your lips!” (R asa Lila 3.14). These ex-
plicitly romantic expressions have been perceived as the voice of thesoul in its passionate yearning for the divine. Devout mystics andsaintly persons have shown, through their own elaborate worship andinterpretation of these stories, that the desire to love God intimately
and passionately lies deeply within the human heart. These specialstories can thus be called sacred love stories.
God as the divine lover is not as foreign to us in the West as per-
haps we might assume. According to a sociological study conductedseveral years ago, a surprising 45 percent of Americans can “imagineGod as a lover.”
9Intimate love of the deity, therefore, is apparently
neither remote nor unco mmon, nor is it seen as existing only in the
past among people of different cultures and distant places. That itspresence is concealed may be due to the conﬁdential nature of theexperience of intimacy in relation to the sacred; perhaps the phe-nomenon is preserved at an under stated and private level of human
religious experience. Though it would be impossible to determine the
pervasiveness of this religious phenomenon, or the type and depth ofexperience, it is clear that humans throughout the ages have desired
intimacy with the divine.
Sacred love stories, in many ways, appear to present the passionate
love shared between a lover and a beloved. They disclose explicit con-ceptions or allegorical depictions of a transcendent realm of love, in
which a supreme deity and affecti onate counterpart—either a devout
soul or divine personage—join t ogether in various phases of amor-6Introduction
9. See Wade Clark Roof and Jennifer L. Roof, “Images of God among Americans,” Jour-
nal for the Scientiﬁc Study of Religion 23, no. 2 (June 1984): 201–205. The summarized re-
sults of this study received attention from the popular magazine Psycho logy Today (June
1985): 12, and the nationwide newspaper USA Today (May 30, 1985). The latter focused
speciﬁcally on the content of “God as a lover” from Psycho logy Today, which was high-
lighted in its section called “Life,” under “Lif eline: A Quick Read on What People Are Talk-
ing About.”
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
ous, even erotic intimacy. The purest and highest attainable love asso-
ciated with these stories occurs only when the recipient of the soul’sexclusive devotion is the supreme Beloved. Such stories have inspiredthe human heart to reach for super lative and pure expressions of love.
It is not surprising that generations of religious writers, in numerous
works, have developed and embe llished essential themes drawn di-
rectly from these sacred stories.
In the Western world, the biblical book Song of Solomon, also
known as the Song of Songs, relating the passionate love between aking and queen, has been regarded by many as a sacred love story.
10
This story has become foundational for various forms of Jewish mys-ticism, such as the Kabbalah. The rich and erotic words of the Songreveal the union of lover and beloved who symbolize, for these tradi-
tions, the divine “queen” and “king” within the godhead. Additionally,the Song of Solomon has been a profound source of inspiration forCatholic love mysticism and Christian piety in general. The feminineand masculine voices of the text have represented the loving relation-ship between the soul and God, respectively, in which the soul be-comes the “bride” and Christ the divine “bridegroom.”
Similarly, traditions of Islamic love mysticism have drawn upon an
ancient Arabic tale that allegorizes the soul’ s capacity to be utterly in-
toxicated with love for God. The story of Layla and Majnun describes
Majnun’s uncontainable madness of affection for his beloved Layla,
from early boyhood throughout his life, and even beyond life.
11Al-
though there has never been complete agreement on the sacred value ordegree of holiness of these particular love stories, often because of theexplicit sensuality and erotic imagery of their content, there is no doubt
that powerful traditions of love mysticism have based their religious vi-sions on such texts. Sacred love stories are indeed stories of romanceand passion, but they are often seen as much more than that. They areregarded by many as sacred expressions of the innermost self that can
lift the human spirit into the highest realms of intimacy with the deity.Sacred Love Stories 7
10. The Song of Songs is readily accessible in any complete translation of the Hebrew
Bible. It has also received scholarly attention as a text apart from its biblical context, and one
ﬁnds, to this day, attempts to translate its especially rich poetry into English. For example,see The Song of Songs: A New Translation, by Ariel Bloch and Chana Bloch (Berkeley: Uni-
versity of California Press, 1995) with elaborat e introduction and commentary to the text;
and The Song of Songs: A New Translation, by Marcia Falk (San Francisco: Harper, 1990)
with illustrations and introduction to the translation. Both editions present the original
text in Hebrew script.
11. See Nizami’s The Story of Layla and Majnun, translated from the Persian and edited
by Dr. Rudolf Gelpke (New Lebanon, N.Y.: Omega Publications, 1997).
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
INDIA ’S SONG OF SONGS
The love poem of the R asa Lila could easily be regarded as the “Song
of Songs” of ancient India. Several Vaishnava sects—those traditions
within the Hindu complex of religion whose worship is centered
upon the supreme deity Vishnu, also known as Krishna—single outthe story of the R asa Lila,c laiming it to be the essence of all lilas.
12As
the Song of Solomon has been elevated to the highest status above allother biblical books by many Jewish and Christian mystics, and thushas become known as the “Song of Songs,” the R asa Lila also has been
honored as the “essence of all lilas” and the “crown-jewel of all acts of
God” by several Vaishnava traditions, for which it functions as the ul-
timate revelation of divine love.
13
The enchanting R asa Li lahas had great inﬂuence on the culture and
religion of India, perhaps even mo re than the Song of Songs has had
on the Western world. For over a thousand years, poets and dramatistshave continually told its story, often creating new stories that expandupon particular themes of the R asa Li la.Artists and dancers from a va-
riety of classical Indian schools have attempted to capture the beauty
and excitement of various events within the story through pictorialrenderings and interpretative danc e performances. In modern times,
in the West and in India, literary and artistic creations continue to begenerated directly from this great work. The passionate love of theGop is for their beloved Lord Krishna has epitomized sacred love in In-
dian civilization, and to this day provides the richest source of poeticand religious inspiration for Hindu love mysticism.
Another Sanskrit love poem, the Gita Govinda or “Song of
Govinda,” by Jayadeva, has been referred to as the song of songs ofIndia by some Indian and Western scholars.
14This twelfth-century
work concerning Govinda, who is Krishna, and his most beloved Gop i,8Introduction
12. The Vaishnava sects of Vallabha, Caitanya, and R adhavallabha celebrate the R asa Lila
as the greatest lila.
13. Krishnad asa Kaviraja uses the words lila-sara (“essence of lilas”) to describe the RL
in C 2.21.44. Vi svanatha Cakravartin describes the R asa Lila as sarva-l ila-cuda-mani in his
commentary to the ﬁrst verse of the RL.
14. The ﬁrst translation of Jayadeva’s work was by the nineteenth-century British
scholar Sir Edwin Arnold, and its title clearly makes the claim: The Indian Song of Songs
(London, 1875). Indian scholars have echoed Ar nold’s claim and accepted this work’s asso-
ciation with the biblical text; see K angra Paintings of the G ita Govinda, by M. S. Randhawa
(Delhi: National Museum, 1963), p. 13. Western scholars of the Song of Solomon have also
drawn parallels between the two works. See Song of Songs: A New Translation with Introduc-
tion and Commentary, by Marvin H. Pope (New Y ork: Doubleday, 1977), especially the sec-
tion entitled “Gita-Govinda, the So-Called ‘Indian Song of Songs,’” pp. 85–89.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
Radha,p resents a tempting parallel to the Song because of the singular
hero and heroine between whom a passionate love tale ensues. By con-
trast, the R asa Li laportrays a group of heroines, though there is special
attention given in one chapter to a favored Gop i,who is assumed by
some Vaishnava sects to be Ra dha.15Furthermore, the R asa Li ladoes
not reach the erotic intensity of the Gita Govinda and the Song of
Songs. Whereas the general tone of the R asa Li lais more amorous or
romantic, the overall tone of both the Song and Jayadeva’s work is con-
siderably more sensuous, if not e xplicitly or metap horically sexual.
Despite these similarities of Jayadeva’s work to the biblical song, the
Rasa Li ladeserves recognition as India’s song of songs in light of its lit-
erary-historical and scriptural parallels. Historically, the Gita Govinda
appears centuries later than the Bha gavata. In fact, the Ra sa Li lais re-
ferred to repeatedly in a refrain within the second part of Jayadeva’sstory (vv. 2–9). Similarly, the Song of Solomon functions as the source
of much literary activity, as we ﬁnd with the Spanish mystic poet, Johnof the Cross, who himself derived direct inspiration from the Song forhis poetry describing the spiritual marriage of the soul and Christ.
The Song of Solomon has had signiﬁcant inﬂuence on Western re-
ligious traditions, especially on Jew ish and Catholic forms of mysti-
cism, in which it has received unmatched attention. The R asa Lila
has also had widespread cultural and religious recognition, particu-larly within certain bhakti or devotional traditions of Vaishnavism.
Whereas appr eciation of the Gita Govinda has been primarily concen-
trated in eastern regions of India such as the states of Bengal andOrissa, the Rasa Lila has had a pan-Indian presence.
Perhaps the most compelling argument for claiming the R asa Lila
to be India’s song of songs would be the powerfully supportive scrip-
tural contexts in which each text is found. Although Jayadeva’s poemis directly inspired by the Bhagavata, it is an independent poem, lack-
ing the greater literary and scriptural context that the Bhagavata and
the Hebrew Bible provide for the R asa Lila and the Song of Solomon,
respectively.
16One could argue that the biblical Song is perhaps even
more dependent upon its context than the Ra sa Li lais on its scriptural
setting, because of the absence of any explicit religious statements inIndia’s Song of Songs 9
15. The Gita Govinda is the ﬁrst text to powerfully establish the name, identity, and role
of Radha as Krishna’s favorite Gop i,stimulating a great deal of later poetic activity, as well
as inﬂuencing the way viewers and readers perceive R adha’s  role in the RL text itself.
16. The Gita Govinda compensates for a lack of scriptural context or authority by pro-
viding a theological introduction: the ﬁrst chapter is devoted primarily to singing the
praises of the various “divine descents,” or avataraforms, of Krishna and Vishnu.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
Figure 3. Ivory miniature painting of R adha and Krishna.
Artist unknown; from the private collection of the author.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
the Song. The story line of the R asa Lila,o n the other hand, is a con-
tinuation of earlier events from within the greater Bhagavata story,
and there is notable material prior and subsequent to the Rasa Lila
that anticipates or reﬂects upon its story. Moreover, much of the the-ological content of the Bhagavata and references to many of its sur-
rounding stories are engaged within the R asa Lila itself.
It is on the basis of this dependence on context that the poetic love
story of the R asa Lila gains, as does the Song of Songs, its sacred aura
and religious authority. Furthermore, each text, as a rariﬁed sacredlove story, has become the jewel in the center of its own scriptural set-ting. In light of these signiﬁcant parallels, the R asa Lila may truly be
considered the song of songs of India.
BHA GA VATA AS THE ULTIMATE SCRIPTURE
There are eighteen Pur anas, or collections of “ancient stories,” and In-
dian and Western scholars alike have recognized that among them,the Bhagavata stands out. Dozens of traditional commentaries have
been written on the Bhagavata, whereas other Pur anas have received
just one or two, if any.
17The Bhagavata Pur ana (BhP) itself declares
that it is “the Purana without imperfection” (amala purana) and themost excellent of all Pur anas.
18
Modern Indian scholars acknowledge the greatness of the text. S.
K. De writes that “The Bhagavata is thus one of the most remarkable
mediaeval documents of mystical and passionate religious devotion,its eroticism and poetry bringing back warmth and colour into reli-gious life.”
19Speciﬁcally referring to the tenth book of the Bhagavata,
A. K. Majumdar states: “the most distinguishing feature of the Bh.P. is
the tenth canto which deals with the life of K rsna, and includes the
rasa-lila, which is unique in our religious literature.”20Western schol-
ars have also identiﬁed the synthetic nature of the text. Daniel H. H.Ingal ls writes: “The Bhagavata draws from all classes, as it does from
all of India’s intellectual traditio ns. It does this without being at allThe Ultimate Scripture 11
17. Edwin F. Bryant, in his introduction to his translation of the tenth book of the Bha-
gavata, has counted as many as eighty-one currently available commentaries on this part of
the text. See his work Krishna: The Beautiful Legend of God (New Y ork: Penguin, 2004), p. xii.
18. See BhP 12.13.17–18.
19. S. K. De, Early History of the Vai snav a Faith and Movement in Bengal (Calcutta:
Firma K. L. Mukhopadhya, 1961), p. 7.
20. A. K. Majumdar, Caitanya: His Life and Doctrine (Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan,
1969), p. 35.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
interested in social questions and int erested in intellectual questions
only so far as they may illustrate or fortify its doctrine of love. What is
important to the Bhagavata is to feel God, to be moved by Him.”21
The compelling text of this Pur ana presents a rich tapestry of di-
verse forms of ancient Indian theological discourse, social thought,
and literature, all of which support its evolved doctrine of devotion.
More than any other Pur ana, it engages much that comes before it by
elaborating upon philosophical themes and stories of religious In-
dia, drawing from both northern and southern traditional cultures,as well as from great scriptures dated as early as the Vedas (circa3000–1200 b.c.e.), India’s oldest and foundational scriptures.
22In-
deed, the Bhagavata has been regarded as the quintessential scripture:
“The very essential core (sara msaram ) of all of the Vedas and all of
the histories has been collected [in the Bhagavata ]” (CC 2.25.145).
The challenge of dating the Bhagavata brings out some of the text’s
literary characteristics. The precise date of its complete formation has
been difﬁcult to ascertain, since the Bhagavata re-presents much of what
has already come before it.23Whereas scholars have often pointed to the
seventh or ninth century c.e. as periods during whic h either portions of
the text or the complete work appeared in its present written form, thetext has also been dated to as early as the fourth century. Moreover, the
Bhagavata records layers of narrations that were initially orally trans-
mitted. This is not surprising, since India is known for its rich oralliterary traditions, beginning with the Vedas themselves, which were
preserved and handed down by pr iestly families for many generations.
Devout Hindus see the Bhagavata Pur anaas an eternal revelation;
yet the text itself presents a description of how it came into exis-12 Introduction
21. Daniel H. H. Ingalls in his foreword to The Divinity of Krishna, by No el Sheth, S.J.
(New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1984), p. xii.
22. See BhP 1.1.3. Friedhelm Hardy considers the Bhagavata “an opus universale,” a spe-
cial puranic text that blends the poetic sense and inte nse devotional expression from south-
ern Tamil culture with philosophical themes of the Upanishads and Vedanta, and the
dharmic social system of the north. See his work Viraha Bhakti: The Early History of K rsna
Devotion in South India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1983), pp. 489ff.
23. It is interesting to note that as early as the second century c.e., the Rasa dance of
Krishna has been described in the South Indian text known as the Cilappatik aram by Ilankõ
Atikal.S ee canto 17 entitled, “The Round Dance of the Herdswomen” in The Cilappati-
karam of Ilanko A tikal,A n Epic of South India, translated, with an introduction and post-
script, by R. Parthasarathy (New Y ork: Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 170–178. Fora recent study critically reviewing the complex issues surrounding the dating of the Bhaga-
vata Pur ana, see Edwin F. Bryant’s lucid article,“The Date and Provenance of the Bhagavata
Purana and the Vaikuntha Perumal T emple,” Journal of Vaishnava Studies 11, no. 1 (Fall
2002): 51–80.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
tence.24The sage Vyasa, whose name means “compiler,” became de-
spondent due to a lack of fulﬁllment, even after compiling the great
literatures of India such as the Vedas, the Mah abharata,and others.25
He turned to his teacher, the renowned sage N arada, and expressed
his utter dissatisfaction. N arada addressed his disciple’s frustration by
explaining to Vyasa that although he had delineated the “ultimatepurposes of human life” ( puru sartha), he had yet to describe the
greatness of Krishna. Thus the Bhagavata is a text that is thought of as
completing the task of compiling the scriptures, by crowning them
with the full theology of Vishnu or Krishna. Certainly there is no
other scriptural text that presents this theology so comprehensively.The teachers of the sixteenth-century bhakti school founded by the
mystic and revivalist Caitanya express the superiority of the text over
that of all other sacred Indian texts, collectively referred to in the fol-lowing as the Vedas: “The Bhagavata describes the essential nature of
Krishna, bhakti, and the relationship to God ( rasa). Therefore its
greatness is supreme among Vedic scriptures” (CC 2.25.150).
Much of the Bhagavata is a “compilation” of earlier texts, but not
merely that. The works engaged by the Bha gavata are reﬁned versions
of previous materials, incorporating the highly evolved theology ofVishnu, and this is certainly the case with the R asa Li lastory. This act of
literary reﬁnement and re-vision is expressed toward the very beginningof the Bhagavata, in a verse that depicts the text as the “ripened fruit” of
the wish-granting tree of all Vedic literature.
26The name of the primary
narrator of the text, Suka, meaning “parrot,” holds special signiﬁcance
here.Vy asa’s compiled stories are narrated by Suka, his son, which causes
them to become especially reﬁned and sweet, just as it is believed that aparrot makes the juice of a mango sweeter, once it has sliced the fruitwith its beak. Also, parrots are known to repeat faithfully what they hear,and similarly, Suka faithfully retells the stories he has heard.
27The Ultimate Scripture 13
24. For the Bhagavata ’s account of why it was written, see BhP 1.5.2–9.
25. Vyasa is known for compiling sacred texts, especially the Vedas, the oldest and most
authoritative scripture of India, perhaps the oldest scriptural text in the world. Among the
four parts of the Vedas, the Rg Veda is the best known, appreciated for its Sanskrit hymns
praising sacriﬁcial practices, philosop hical musings, and devotional expression.
26. “The ripened fruit ( galitam phalam) of / the wish-granting tree of the Vedas / Has
perfectly culminated in the ﬂow / of nectar ( amrta-druva) from the mouth of Suka. / Y ou
drink the juice ( rasa) of this fruit constantly, / which is the Bhagavata, the ultimate abode—/
Ah, for you appreciate what is tasteful (r asikah) / and possess a sense for what is beautiful
(bhavukah) in this world” (BhP 1.1.3).
27. For more information on the signiﬁcance of Suka as a transmitter within Hindu
traditions, see Wendy Doniger’s “Echoes of the Mah abhar ata: Why Is a Parrot the Narrator
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
This ﬁner, more pleasing result produced by the parrotlike effect
ofSuka’s narrations is readily observable when comparing other
puranic versions of Krishna’s dalliance with the cowherd women to
the Bhagavata ’s presentation. Suka’s vision combines some essential
Krishna-Gopi themes found in three other versions: the Visnu Pu-
rana, Brahma Purana, and Hariva msa texts. The verses in the Vi snu
and Brahma Puranas that parallel the Bhagavata ’s Rasa Lila actually
include the event of the R asa dance, whereas the Hariva msa does not,
although it clearly shares other sce nes and motifs of the story. All
three versions are similar to the Bhagavata in dramatic content and
utilize, in places, similar and even the same vocabulary. But the story’sﬁnest imagery and poetic rendition are found in the Bhagavata ver-
sion.
28
As mentioned above, the Bhagavata ’s Rasa Li lareﬂects several of the
literary and theological features of the greater Bhagavata, a context that
is lacking in the three counterpart versions. It is no wonder that this texthas been preferred by later Vaishnava sects (those following Vallabha,Caitanya, and R adhavallabha). The dramatic tone and content of the
Bhagavata story embellish the erotic presentation of the Hariva msaand
further develop the theological apologia of the Visnu Pura na,thus
combining and engaging aspects from both, resulting in a far richer
text. The effect, then, of Suka’s parrotlike narration on the Bhagavata ’s
Rasa Li lais a substantially more developed story that is the most elo-
quent, dramatic, and theologically sophisticated of the four versions.
We have seen that the Vaishnava teachers regarded the Rasa Lila as
their “song of songs,” the most important and elevated passage of theBhagavata. We may ask, does the Bhagavata text itself enthrone the
Rasa Lila passage as the lila of all lilas? Are the Vaishnava interpreters
of the text correct in thinking that the Bhagavata regards the Rasa Lila
in this way, or is their appreciation do ctrinally driven? I will present,
in the “T extual Illuminations” and “Notes and Comments” sections of14 Introduction
of the Bh agavata Pur ana and the Devi Bhagavata?” in Purana Perennis: Reciprocity and
Transformation in Hindu and Jaina Texts, edited by Wendy Doniger (Albany: State Univer-
sity of New Y ork Press, 1993).
28. See treatment of ﬁrst verse in Notes and Comments to RL 1.1 for a comparison of
the ﬁrst verse of the Bhagavata to the Visnu Purana and Hariva msa versions. Clearly, a
measure of vocabulary and imagery is shared by all three. A synoptic analysis of these ver-
sions brings out much of what is unique about the Bhagavata ’s presentation (see appen-
dix 3, “Synoptic Analysis of R asa Lila”).
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
this work, compelling indications, both literary and theological, that
the Bhagavata indeed elevates the Rasa Lila to an ultimate status
within its vast text.
Let us consider the major literary indications pointing to the R asa
Lila’s  special status. First, the poetic language and style of the text are
distinctive. Second, no other story within the Bhagavata resembles a
drama as does the Rasa story, and though its drama clearly ﬁts intothe greater text of which it is a part, it also has the ability to stand in-dependently, as one would expect of a Sanskrit romantic drama. Fur-thermore, the tight dramatic structure stretching over an unusuallylengthy ﬁve contiguous chapters is, again, a unique feature among alllilas of the Bhagavata. Third, as has been mentioned, “framing” pas-
sages placed before the story anticipate and lead up to the text, andthose that follow remember and invoke the signiﬁcance of the lila.
These passages may be a single verse (inside and outside of the tenthbook), or partial and even whole chapters (within the tenth book),prior to or following the ﬁve-chapter story. No other episode in theBhagavata has received this type of elaborate framing. Moreover, the
characters of the hero and heroines are developed prior to the story,and their interactions within the episode reach heights not achievedprior to or following the R asa event. Finally, throughout the passage
as many as eighteen other lilas from within the Bhagavata are recalled,
a rare occurrence in any lila.
Unique theological features also indicate the special status of the
Rasa Li la.The ﬁrst and last verses of the piece launch and cap off its
story with dramatic indications. Krishna takes full refuge in the God-dess in the ﬁrst verse, which is unprecedented in the greater Bhagavata
text, and the author states in the ﬁnal benedictory verse that the “high-
est devotion” is achieved by hearing or reciting this story, a benediction
that is not offered anywhere else. Additionally, the Bhagavata presents
many great devotees of Krishna, but none receives the same level ofrecognition and praise in the text as the cowherd maidens of Vraja,
whose love and sacriﬁce even amaze Krishna himself. They are de-picted as master yogin iswho are capable of embracing God within
their hearts, their devotion excelled by no one. Furthermore, among allthe Gopi passages of the Bhagavata ’s tenth book, the R asa Li ladrama
introduces and tells the tale of the special singular Gop i,i d e n t iﬁed by
the Caitanya school as Ra dha,K rishna’s dearest consort. This favored
cowherd maiden is revisited only once more, seventeen chapters later(BhP 10.47), where her soliloquy to the black bee is presented. Clearly,Sacred Context 15
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
the Bhagavata, through these and other theological and literary
features of the text, deliberately establishes the R asa Li laas the very
center of its work, celebrated as such by many Vaishnava traditions.
SACRED CONTEXT OF THE RA SA LI LA
The Bhagavata ’s Sanskrit text contains 335 chapters, consisting of sa-
cred stories, philosophical discourse, and epic poetry that all respond
to the essential question of what one is to do to prepare for death.29Of
the twelve books forming the Bhagavata, the tenth and longest book
comprises ninety chapters, including the ﬁve chapters of the R asa Lila
(chapters 29–33). This is the most famous and widely read of thebooks, particularly known for its descriptions of Krishna’s youthfullilas in Vraja.
The Bhagavata Pur ana presents a dialogue between the sage Suka
and a king named Par iksit, which addresses the question of how to
prepare for death. The text possesses a complex narrative structureconsisting of three layers. The authorial ﬁrst voice, as we have seen, is
understood to be that of Vy asa. The work opens by introducing the
voice of the general narrator, the sage S uta, as he addresses a gather-
ing of holy men in the Naimi sa forest, delivering the outer narrative
shell. S uta in turn narrates the vision of the narrator of the Bhagavata
stories themselves, the sage Suka. Thus, the ﬁrst narrative is by Vy asa,
who reveals the dialogue between S uta and the sages assembled at
Naimisa. And the second narrative is by S uta, who reveals the dia-
logue between Suka and King Pariksit. Within this second narrative
frame, we learn about the king, whose death is imminent due to acurse from a small boy. The story goes as follows:
The renowned king Pariksit, while searching for water in the forest,
came across a great sage deeply immersed in meditation. The king re-
quested water from the sage, but received no response. Feeling resent-ful, he picked up a nearby dead snake with his bow, and angrilydraped the snake over the shoulder of the sage. The son of the sage,infuriated upon hearing how the king had insulted his father, cursedthe king to die in just seven days from the poisonous bite of a fancifulsnake-bird.16 Introduction
29. For a scholarly treatment on the theme of death in the Bhagavata, see E. H. Rick
Jarow’ s book Tales for the Dying: The Death Narrative of the Bh agavata-Pur ana (Albany:
State University of New Y ork Press, 2003).
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
The king, feeling remorseful, accepted the curse as his fate and
seated himself on the bank of a holy river. Soon, many renowned
sages arrived, for he was a much-loved king. After greeting them, theking said, “Let the snake-bird bite me at once. I desire only that all ofyou continue reciting the glorious divine acts of Lord Vishnu.”
30In-
quiring from the sages about the hig hest perfection of life, he asked,
“What is the duty of one who is about to die?”31The beautiful young
sage known as Suka, son of Vy asa, praised the king for his inquiry, and
offered an explanation that points to an essential message of the Bha-gavata: a long life wasted in ignorant activity is useless compared to a
short life utilized in achieving the ultimate spiritual goal.
32
The third narrative, then, constitutes the greater part of the Bha-
gavata text. Here, Suka responds to the seminal question of the king
concerning how to prepare for death. Throughout the Bhagavata,
Suka narrates stories to and converses with Par iksit, the king, who is
in the submissive role of Suka’s student. The R asa Lila also opens with
Suka as the narrator, and his voice is heard in each act of the drama.
Most of the stories or narrations of the Bhagavata begin with an
introductory line preceding the opening verse (that is, just before theﬁrst quarter line of the poetically metered verses), and the R asa Lila is
no exception. Directly preceding the ﬁrst verse of the drama arethe words, sri-badaraya nir uvaca, “the illustrious Badarayani spoke.”
33
Here, Suka is introduced by the name B adarayani, which appears only
once, to inform the reader that Suka is the son of Badar ayana, another
name for Vy asa.34Therefore, Suka is not only a sage recognized by the
king and assembly of sages accompanying him; he is also the son ofthe divinely empowered Vy asa, the compiler of the Bhagavata, grant-
ing even greater authority to his narration.
The vision that Suka shares with his student, King Par iksit, is not
only what he sees but also his interpretation of what he sees. WhenSuka reveals the poetic narrative and descriptions of the R asa Li la,h e
acts as a bard and sage, whereas when he discusses and reﬂects uponthe stories, he acts as the interpreting theologian. The conversationSacred Context 17
30. BhP 1.19.15.
31. BhP 1.19.37.32. BhP 2.1.12.33. The reader may consult the complete transliterated text of the R asa Lila in the sec-
tion titled “The Sanskrit T ext,” toward the end of this book.
34. Only some editions of the Bhagavata Pur ana introduce Suka as Badarayani in the
Rasa Lila passage. Other editions simply introduce him as Suka.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
Figure 4. Wall painting of Suka narrating the Bhagavata ’s Rasa Lila to the
King and Gathered Sages. From Gop inathji Temple, Jaipur. Photograph by
the author.
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu
between Suka and the king is in turn being narrated by S uta to an
audience consisting of Saunaka and his group of sages. S uta and
Saunaka’s conversation is obviously narrated, as well, by the original
narrator and author, Vy asa. Effectively, then, the Ra sa Li lais delivered
to the reader through telescoping narratives; it is a multilayered con-
versation within which narrations of other conversations are taking
place.
Before exploring the many other remarkable features of this liter-
ary masterpiece in greater detail, I will introduce the translation of
the dramatic poem itself, so that the reader may experience a freshencounter of its plot and imagery. Following the translation, furthermediation or guidance will be offered in the “T extual Illuminations,”as well as the “Notes and Comments” portions of this book. Thetranslation is presented as a freestanding drama, with chapters 29through 33 from the tenth book of the Bhagavata now appearing as
acts 1 through 5 within the drama, each act containing various scenes.
Following the Rasa Lila translation are translations of two famous
passages concerning the cowherd maidens. These episodes frame theRasa story, one prior to and the other following it. The ﬁrst is thechapter known as “Song of the Flute” (Ve nu Gita), in which the Gopis
describe the power and beauty of Krishna ’s divine ﬂute music. It is ap-
propriate that this passage should appear before the R asa Lila in the
Bhagavata, since it is the ﬂute music that awakens the maidens’ loving
self-surrender at the beginning of the story, initiating the unfolding ofthe plot. The second translation is called “Song of the Black Bee”(Bhramara Gita), a portion of a chapter that expresses loss and love inseparation from Krishna. It is famous for its description of the specialGopi,i d e n t iﬁed as Ra dha,who speaks to a black bee in loving madness.Sacred Context 19
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be
distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical
means without prior written permission of the publisher.
For general queries, contact webmaster@press.princeton.edu