--- language: - "en" tags: - text-classification - sentiment-analysis task_categories: - text-classification configs: - config_name: quality data_files: - split: train path: - quality/train.csv.gz - split: test path: - quality/test.csv.gz - config_name: readability data_files: - split: train path: - readability/train.csv.gz - split: test path: - readability/test.csv.gz - config_name: sentiment data_files: - split: train path: - sentiment/train.csv.gz - split: test path: - sentiment/test.csv.gz --- # Text statistics This dataset is a combination of the following datasets: - [agentlans/text-quality-v2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/agentlans/text-quality-v2) - [agentlans/readability](https://huggingface.co/datasets/agentlans/readability) - [agentlans/twitter-sentiment-meta-analysis](https://huggingface.co/datasets/agentlans/twitter-sentiment-meta-analysis) The main purpose is to collect the large data into one place for easy training and evaluation. ## Data Preparation and Transformation ### Quality Score Normalization The dataset was enhanced with additional columns, and quality scores (n = 909 533) were normalized using Ordered Quantile normalization through the `bestNormalize` package in R. This transformation mapped original values to a standardized normal distribution, resulting in a new variable, `transformed_quality`, included in both training and test datasets to enhance statistical modeling capabilities. ### Readability Score Calculation U.S. reading grade levels were transformed using the Box-Cox method (`bestNormalize` package) with λ = 0.8766912. A custom function standardized the results and inverted the scale to generate 'readability' scores, where higher values indicate easier readability. The standardized Box-Cox transformation was applied to 919 663 non-missing observations, yielding the following statistics: - λ (lambda) = 0.8766912 - Mean (before standardization) = 7.908629 - Standard deviation (before standardization) = 3.339119 These transformations improved the dataset's suitability for subsequent statistical analyses. ## Dataset size The full datasets were shuffled and randomly split into `train` and `test` splits. | Dataset | Train split | Test split | |---------|-------------|------------| | quality | 809 533 | 100 000 | | readability | 869 663 | 50 000 | | sentiment | 128 690 | 10 000 |