Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/583

Txapulin

Click

muchocine

It is nothing more than the Christmas story, Dickens, where you change the morals of a man discovering his past, his present and his future, only this time, instead of ghosts, spirits or ghosts, we have a remote control.

The only apparent originality is the plot excuse: a man (Adam Sandler) wretched, bored of his life and his family discovers how can change your life through an as common as a command object at distance, whose typical functions (do stop, lower the volume, change chapter, etc?) magically apply to your environment. Everything else is already seen; the story is nothing more than the Christmas story, Dickens, where you change the morals of a man discovering his past, his present and his future, only this time, instead of ghosts, spirits or ghosts, have a remote control at distance and the character of Christopher Walken. What happens is that nothing here fit or make sense, and also comedy absurd with the typical conservative American label to preserve the family above all.After five minutes of projection we have already forgotten history and dedicate ourselves to find thanks to jokes, which looks at your where, have them. It will be because the humor presented to us is not so white as we expect in an argument of such moralina, and sexual and eschatological references and swearing, without reaching the levels of the Farrelli, of course, are quite present.Avoid it if you can, but if see, only laugh and not think.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/993

Rafa Ferrer

La casa de cera

muchocine

Recommended for all those fans of youthful terror...

Teen-horror movie without searching many complications drinking from a thousand sources, from the original film (of which this is a remake) of Vincent Price, of which this picks up the name for the villain of the day, the film itself is another of the genre, where youngsters completely ostiables are falling into the hands of the murderer of the place. "Original" perhaps the way to die, and is now not the character of color the first to die.Paris Hilton and Elisha Cuthbert pretty well both wearing Palm and Paris making something of humor on "the reason why it is famous" (his famous video on the internet), anyway, that we should not ask del olmo pears (impressive Cuthbert's).Recommended for all those fans of youthful terror.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2785

Jose Contreras

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

We can not feel seduced by an individual who confronts an unscrupulous Agency, a Ministry valued a life as a decimal, a Department of men wearing a tie and notebooks last generation who decide on the lives of others as if were choosing your dish on a menu.

There is a scene of "The Bourne Ultimatum" that takes place precisely in Madrid in which Jason Bourne a trap to the agents of the CIA with a fan. The viewer expects you to use it with violence, but in reality, the fan serves so officials think that there is someone in the room. It's a ploy by disinformation. "The Bourne Ultimatum" is a genuine film of our troubled century, does not win the strongest, wins the one who has more information.While the saga of 007 exhausted all the possibilities of a countdown of Miss Bond at the last second, never in the penultimate, the Bourne saga deck the possibilities of information in real time. The two duel protagonists are Bourne who knows the tricks of the CIA, and a head of the Agency facing him from his Office in New York, moving threads, handling huge sources of information, mobile, GPS, Internet, video cameras and databases. Bourne travels through cities around the world illustrating the variety of their roofs, its meters, and their police uniforms. Each geography stuffed a piece of the puzzle, each dead serves to supplement the information that should lead you to discover who he is. Bourne ignores things essential, as its name, while the Agency knows everything, as a fierce big brother. Bourne has some annoying insect in the Immaculate network that has woven the power. It is the splinter that makes flying through the air a protective and paternal system at first glance. Although we are not sure of the trail of deaths left justified, cannot fail to feel seduced by an individual who confronts an unscrupulous Agency, a Ministry valued a life as a decimal, a Department of men wearing a tie and notebooks last generation who decide on the lives of others as if were choosing your dish on a menu.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1473

Mario

El Motorista Fantasma (Ghost Rider)

muchocine

The taste of Coca-Cola Zero is unbearable: Nicolas Cage finje be a biker smoking non drinking alcohol but candy does? and he is addicted to the documentaries of monkeys.

Is true that some film makers follow a whiff to stale of which it is difficult to detach. In his day, Daredevil following a style at the very least questionable, with the cuernecitos leaping across the rooftops between ridiculous dialogues and pop hits / rock totally notable. Mark Steven Johnson began to drop those bad effluents, and the feeling that you were going to accompany throughout his career was very strong.Yesterday was premiered in cinemas around the world Ghost Rider. Mark is put hands to work again, and the result is neither more nor less than what was expected. As in the adventures of the man without fear, we have a bland movie like few, marked with digital effects television and very dynamic (not consistent) arguably. However some details lowered the pretensions of its predecessor, as the villains, led by Black Heart, which sadly resemble the frustrated Elektra.En malutos this time, Jonhy Blaze is a circus artist who makes a pact with the Devil (by mistake, first stupidity) and that, later, the same Mefistófeles kidding coarsely. Peter Fonda plays the worst Satan I remember, decorated with very bad special effects, but without a blade of charisma.The taste of Coca-Cola Zero is unbearable: Nicolas Cage finje be a biker smoking non drinking alcohol but candy does? and he is addicted to the documentaries of monkeys. Eva Mendes plays an improbably confusing girlfriend that her boyfriend her burning head. Is the eternal sidekick not for jokes? In short, aguachirri.The soundtrack is disregarded, when everything seemed to indicate that the items rokeros and metal attached to the perfection with the character; We no longer crush with passengers the MTV hits, but that one of the topics interpreted it Ozzy nor solve the mess.The action sequences are a good plomazo and in half of the roll you are already watching the clock. Perhaps the only thing noticeable is the characterization of the own rider and the intro which tells the story of the Ghost Rider (personally also highlight the extraordinary chupa of leather, which no longer anyone who finds, at least at a modest price).These movies so bad would only need a dose of sinvergüencería and bizarrismo to be sympathetic. However, in the new times of CGI and qualification for children under thirteen, the series bé dead, not causing anything other than yawns.It is a pity all this, when years ago we entered the cinemas to see things like Robocop with our children face, and however we are here? I still did not I loaded to anyone with the ICU I keep at home.Conclude, if you are going to see the Ghost Rider because you know what awaits you: sugar, absurdez and quite boredom overdose? and but that is to say my companion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/380

Illaq

Alatriste

muchocine

The problem of the film, in my opinion, is that you have to condense too many incidents in a very limited time

Just as who says, see Alatriste, a film that I liked and, at the same time, I was disappointed. I am not an expert in the art of "watching movies", but, rather, a voyeur film and, therefore, although this is, inevitably, a critique, it must be taken, preferably, as mere opinion and I believe that it would be desirable to see reflected other views, probably more expert in this field. In fact, it is difficult to conceptualize a production of this type, especially when one has read the literary work that serves as a basis, that is compressed in 147 minutes of film narration that, basically, is staying true to that. Naturally, the result is complex and controversial. As I see it (and as I see the literary work), Alatriste is a subterfuge to present the Spain of the 17TH century from the perspective of Diego Alatriste, far removed from the bubble of power while at the same time, linked to that bubble for a thousand reasons, giving it a special interest because diving in reality sociopolíticoculturalreligiosa of the timetrying to approaching it from the position of the Plebs of the time, although, inevitably, filter the view of someone today in the Maremagnum. Seems to me that Diego Alatriste, made of flesh and blood in Viggo Mortensen, is a reflection of Arturo Pérez-Reverte, father of the literary creature and, therefore, "grandfather" of the film, whose face court reminds me of Mortensen (obviously this is absolutely subjective). On the other hand, from my point of view, a film adaptation always a major problem to the viewer who has read the literary work which has served basis, because this is influencing the reader through the text to recreate it, imagining them, characters, scenes, situations and places, while the film narrative removes that step of the imagination of the viewer and, in return, aims to introduce it in the same action through the images. This problem is also the Director of the film and, logically, of all those who are involved in it. But we split. For starters, the atmosphere. Found me simply impressive. It should bear in mind that it is a film of many different actions which link is the main character and that this not only does not remain in one place, they changed places, times and situations. As well, every place, every time and every situation has its setting itself, in my view, very wise. See, if not, these samples: photography, Paco Femenia, perhaps the most prominent element of the film. I do not think that any donkey is say that you give the film an impressive wealth of different atmospheres, according to the times, situations and places. Extraordinary countless games with light, which introduce the viewer in situations as varied as the blows of hand in Flanders, Madrid intrigues or the heat of the battles. On the music of Roque Baños gives me the feeling that integrates seamlessly into the work, which, in my view, is a success. For its part, Agustín Díaz Yanes, as screenwriter, has opted to offer a view of the life of Alatriste, for a few years, to the end, perhaps, of portraying the character in its multiple facets, while never being who is and who has been, which summarizes in his presentation Pérez-Reverte: wasn't the most honest man or the pious, but was a courageous man. Diego Alatriste and Tenorio was called, and he had fought as a soldier of the old thirds in the wars in Flanders. In my view, is in principle a merit, therein lies the fundamental problem of the film. In his role as director, Díaz Yanes outboard work: shots long, appropriate to the situations that presented and with the tone you want to print his story; measured camera movements, stunning scenery, hyperrealistic sequences, a set which conveys perfectly the harshness of the life of the soldier and the people, his tiny price, the existence of the powerful, tensions between them for their struggle for power, the street life, tavern, the Francos, the Inquisition, the fear, the tension of cavalry charges, the life of the (not so distant from today) infantryman... Even duels, that perhaps are short when we think of other movies, it is easy to respond more to the reality. What about the players? Obviously, there is talk of Viggo Mortensen: his performance is impeccable, because I think it conveys perfectly the "being" of Alatriste. At the beginning, you can "confuse" a little his diction (perhaps by the effect of the imagination of the exlector.), but fails to defacing the character. I would also highlight the performance of Blanca Portillo (fray Emilio Bocanegra, Inquisitor general), whose diction also me "despistó" and yet manages to convey, I believe that to perfection, the sinister character that represents. Very good performances by Antonio Pérez Dechent (partner of Alatriste), Nacho Pérez (Íñigo Balboa young), Unax Ugalde (Íñigo Balboa), Juan Echanove (Quevedo), Ariadna Gil (María de Castro), Elena Anaya (Alquézar Angelica), Javier Cámara (count-Duke of Olivares), Enrico Lo Verso (Malatesta). Somewhat blurred is Eduardo Noriega (count of Guadalmedina), although you may owe to the role. Maybe I forgot some characters, but these are those who remember better. Then, with so many virtues, is I why am disappointed? I have already mentioned that the problem of the film, in my opinion, is that you have to condense too many incidents in a very limited time. Changes in situation imposed by this excess break the pace and, in certain cases, I understand that they can get bored (not to me, certainly) and, of course, cannot hold the viewer in a vacuum (hence Yes). And that is a pity, because the effort is worthy of applause, but the end result was not, in my opinion, that would have liked. I have read some "very critical" criticism and not I who say that its author is not right. However, to me only I have to say that here. Ultimately, each viewer becomes his input and, together, are the spectators who have the last word.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/288

Daniel Galindo

Silent Hill

muchocine

You cannot have enough packaging to entertain us for just one hour. The plot is bland and predictable.

A long and confusing history based on a classic console games sneaks into the Billboard. Only the youngest may avoid that it sinks into the depths of oblivion, having done real merit to this. To forgive me video game experts to compare Silent Hill with Alone in the dark, although on the record that I am only referring to the film adaptations. As a basic point only be mention that the film starring Christian Slater and Stephen Dorff is rated as one of the 50 worst films of the history. Already in his day we cebamos quite with it, so we highlight some niceties of Silent Hill. Part of the synopsis of the original product but the director (of Crying Freeman and the Pact of the wolves) stretches the situations causing the boredom. In different releases of the game, characters of diverse origin just in the heart of a damn comarca. The screenplay, written by one of those responsible for Pulp Fiction, drink from the same argument until just reconducido by the reiteration of a bland and predictable storyline from minute 40 approximately. It is hard to imagine the huge budget invested in the tape, necessary to recreate an abandoned city and combine sequences real with all kinds of special effects and computer designs. It is perhaps a disbursement to recover in the long term for those responsible not ruled out the idea of starting a series with this title failed. Despite reminiscent of based on legends, including burning of witches, horror film Silent Hill fails to have sufficient packaging to entertain us for just one hour. The problem is that there is more envelope in the form of disturbing atmosphere that content, something that is not allowed in an action film which lasted 127 minutes. Video games and film form a so well avenido marriage as the comic book and the big screen, although the second couple less disappointed. Of the sons of the first, that there have been many (Tomb Raider, Doom, House of dead, Resident evil), I prefer the more gifted: Final Fantasy with the Dr. Aki Ross who gave life an excellent actress Cybernetics.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/609

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Los Borgia

muchocine

It empacha very much and is saved by a few great actors. Tibia has been the experience. Fu or fa, said my grandmother.

They have some commitment to sanctify Spanish Cinema: climb over the French, which was always the benchmark with what espesitos dialogues, black-and-white of Fable in the Paris taken by lovers and the nouvelle vague, which was an invention of a film very in spate magazine. Others have a unhealthy habit to stock and argue that their precarious health comes by the ailing initiatives of the State, which does not give a euro for this patriotic film. All of which come to place Los Borgia in this limbo of imprecise definition of films which, without being round, nor are lunchrooms. Which strives to destroy her will find arguments. Who pontifiquen his virtues, arguments there.Mine are all warm. Tibia has been the experience. Fu or fa, said my grandmother. The trailer is the best of the footage. No to swallow more minutes. Its splendor is oxidized soon. Fails, for example, in the obvious: in the near. It is not credible. Takes no risks should be, and so everything is left in a threshold of intent which not coagulate, but they spared no (who doubts it) infrastructure, logistics, staff, people of talent, but then the brilliance, talent and all that trash of Hispanic genius is lost immediately.Film that empacha very much, is saved by a few great actors. What we say. They are people with a few tables and knew that Alatriste was behind and that the public wants war and history, and potatoes with a dark past and Vatican machinations several. That enters the eye. And the music is great.We grant you an exquisite time that I, at least, lack increasingly to leisure. I came to see that he would leave the shot for this stock, had come to walk the streets of my town, that have their charm. I had plugged my Hi-Fi equipment and he would have lost golosamente time on the first Genesis, before Phil Collins albums. Or had seen again evil thirst. What more good movie. How beautiful is the cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2609

Iñaki Bilbao

Lucky You

muchocine

Light world of professional poker. If it had not been directed by Curtis Hanson, it would not be wrong, but he being the Director of "L.A. Confidential", the black gender absolute masterpiece, you know little.

Entertaining and enjoyable film about poker players, where this sport (many not so qualify as well), goes to second place when human feelings between father and son comes.Although perhaps not pass into the background, but that both are complementary, becoming the same thing, since that father and son carry the game to their lives and vice versa.The film lasts more than two hours and not noticeable. This means that bored not the slightest and interested enough to maintain the concentration of the Viewer. But that isn't enough to convince at all.The tape is not only far more light than one might assume in advance (the opposite of the excellent "Rounders"), but that would have required given the undeniable harshness of history.Although there are at all times emotional tension, there is no scenes with enough nerve to stay in the memory.All trasncurre assimilating gradually until you reach end in tone with the set of the film, that is, quite calmly, Miss claw and spark.Best thing is its great prologue with the excellent scene of dialogue between the protagonist and the owner of the House of endeavours. In those five minutes or perhaps something else, know how is the protagonist. And we also have the good moment of the poker game between father and son in the cafeteria, where they are on the table, in addition to the letters, the feelings between them, what unites them and what separates them.The rest is easily digestible, with successful moments as a golf bet and others where we would like more emotional involvement and where some characters only are drawn, as Charles Martin Smith or the own Drew Barrymore, that sometimes is a simple comparsa.In definiva, if it had not been directed by Curtis Hanson, it would not be wrong, but he being the Director of "L.A. Confidential", the black gender absolute masterpiece, you know little.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3132

Andrés Pons

Ocurrió cerca de su casa

muchocine

Unfairly or by the whims of fate this film lacks prestige, unknown to most, its popularity is practically non-existent when we are with probably the most outstanding of this type of film example.

Many films in the horror film used the mockumentary to achieve greater realism with less budget. Some of them ended up breaking the box office "The Witch of BLAIR, Cannibal Holocaust" are the most known, why not cases the only nor the best examples.At the beginning of the ninety one unknown Belgian director "only has a previous film" with a cast of non-professional except the protagonist that we saw in ASTERIZ or NARCO. Is the manga bag a genius that we hope time put in place.Unfairly or by the whims of fate this film lacks prestige, unknown to most, its popularity is practically non-existent when we are with probably the most outstanding of this type of film example.Told with such humour is frozen you the smile, the crimes committed with millimeter precision accompanied by creepy dialogues. The interpretation of the main actor is simply anthology, realism to each level you wrapped up in this infernal aura of facts so heinous that it can almost taste the pain.Music and photography end up accompanying this little masterpiece of the macabre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3301

Hombre Lobo

El Orfanato

muchocine

Although this represents a good step for the formation of an industry of gender in the country, as a film it is pretty poor and easily forgettable.

Few things are already say about the orphanage (2007), except perhaps the surprise which has caused me tremendous glove silk with which criticism has dealt with a film that in practice nothing more or less drinking proposal. I put that I speak not of the typical tarifadas criticisms with which the distributors tend to support their products; praise to the opera prima of Juan Antonio Bayona have reached even several strata of "independent" critique. And is that if something I clear after the viewing of this film is that, in its case, seems to be two different views: those who see the tape as a contribution to the "cinema" Spanish (specifically those that hold in genre cinema and not repetitive dramones of Civil war or vulgar social proselytizing) and those that judge her only as a film. The views are unequal, but that is due to the work of Bayonne is also.And is that, purely narrative level, the failure at the orphanage are more than evident: input becomes obvious that we have a film patchwork whose most interesting sequences are because they are taken from classics like Suspense (1961), the changeling (1980) and Poltergeist (1982), or even more recent like the other works (2001) and fragile (2005)all of them (admittedly) far superior to film Bayona, that happens ultimately be another exponent of the already worn formula for children, old mansions crappy and secrets of the past, everything revolving around the already very overused archetype of "Mother courage" to face supernatural forces to recover the missing son. Difficult it has Mr Bayona to achieve something interesting from a premise which is not given any new contribution, and above all the weight lead role in an actress so limited as Belén Rueda, who jumps from the incapacitating to the hysteria of inexplicable form.Another problem is the beginning, in which the character of Belén Rueda arrives with his family to the old Asturian House stood where the orphanage of his childhood, becomes too long and uninteresting. It is only when I finally get the supernatural element Bayonne film begins to charge force, a virtue which is revealed in what to me is one of their best sequence: one involving the paranormal investigators, which included a Geraldine Chaplin making Zelda Rubinstein. Unfortunately, this interesting time (that gives way to a frantic and cash supernatural showdown between the protagonist and the inhabitants of the House) is truncated by the arrival of a disastrous end; the final twist that encloses the history is not only predictable up to say enough is enough, but it hides behind an overly sweetened and corny, outcome that is trying to be poetic and sublime but fails miserably. That is blame not only of the obvious constraints of Belén Rueda as an actress, but a script full of plot holes, inconsistencies and loose ends that don't have nothing better to do than defraud the viewer at the end.Still, not everything is bad, that film Bayona gets really good moments when he tries to recreate in its atmosphere and flee melodramatic sentimentalism. It is only when it escapes from its potential as a horror film when it falls. In addition, the mere fact of that attention be given to the film genre already made in this country (and Spanish) is a step forward, even if the benefit is this film and not others much better made previously, as for example the the Devil's backbone (2000), by Guillermo del Toro, who here acts as executive producer making the film in a couple theme of his work El laberinto del Fauno (2006). Apart from that, the amount of positive reviews that this film has received is done to me inexplicable.The orphanage, therefore, can be seen in two ways: while represents a good step for the formation of an industry of gender in the country, such as film is quite poor and easily forgettable. As as happened with 28 weeks later (2007), we have a medium-sized tape that has received a bombo disproportionate solely because his head is Spanish. That there is no who remove me the head.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/453

Kiko de España

Misión imposible 3

muchocine

Agile, exciting, dramatic, fast-paced and entretenidísima, ideal for these evenings of heat African and far superior to the vast majority of blockbusters.

Olvidense of Scientology. Forget the placentas. Returns the best Cruise. After giving a month of term to all Brats comemierdas doceañeros that crowd the cinemas, I got, in a completely empty room, as he assumed from the outset (Tuesday, 16: 30) to see the "last superespectáculo Made in Cruise". and I liked it a lot.I think "Mission impossible" a masterpiece and one of the best films of my beloved Brian De Palma and after the drubbing of the delivery of the yesteryear large John Woo ("Face to face" is his best movie as well as an absolute masterpiece) was quite reluctant to see the third, finally signed by J.J. Abrams instead of the initially planned Fincher or Carnahan. Abrams, creator of "Alias" and "Lost", with note passes the test, I do not know if it will be a great director, his next movie is "Star Trek XI".SPOILERS (if you've seen the trailer can read quietly) but let's "MI3", the adventure "staff" of the agent Ethan Hunt, that deberescatar his beloved from the clutches of Owen Davian. Arranca masterfully in media res, achieving that my ass (and millions of assholes in the world) not moved one iota of your armchair with a sensational scene between the villanísimo, a son of perraPhilip Seymour Hoffman grandios and the heroisísimo resolved a few great close-up.END of SPOILERSEl case is that there is action during the two horazas that lasts and a lot of smart turns of script in which Abrams moves like a fish in water, in this aspect is a both television. (but television quality, i.e. If you like "24", "Lost", "alias". you'll love "MI3".)Cinematically, Abrams is not any prodigy, but we would appreciate that you do not use the "video clip system", arriving at times to the first filmimposible, especially the part of the Vatican desk, primahermana of the party who opened the original De Palma. Agile, exciting, dramatic, fast-paced and entretenidísima, ideal for these evenings of heat African and far superior to the vast majority of blockbusters. A 8´5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2261

Luna

Bajo las estrellas

muchocine

A story that could fall on the topic but that manages to rise to the height of an interesting proposal that will leave a good taste to all those who dare to see it.

For a few years, numerous directors novar them are getting projecting his materials operas on the large screens with uneven qualities. It is not the case of this film, that despite being the first feature film of this director shows great maturity with its mise en scène and makes a solid and interesting approach in relation to script and Assembly.Preceded by the obtained awards in Malaga Festival in 2007 (best film, best director, best actor and best screenplay novel) I'm sure that is going to have a long distance both in commercial theaters Awards (remember the similar case with Azuloscurocasinegro that so many satisfactions has given to its director Daniel Sánchez Arévalo).Viscarret has adapted the work of Fernando Aramburu "The trumpeter of the Utopia" to tell, without falling into sentimentality cheap, the story of a musician who returns to his hometown to bury his father. The reunion with his brother, the girlfriend and the daughter of his girlfriend will completely change you life, and it is that as its slogan reads, "all deserve a second chance".Especially memorable is the relationship that Viscarret gets translated into 24 frames per second between the trumpeter (Alberto San Juan) and girls (Violeta Rodriguez), a relationship film and real as life itself.Indeed we must highlight the work of Alberto San Juan, as one of the best of his career, and the election of Violeta Rodríguez has also been very successful. Perhaps the work of Julián Villagrán less prominence by being a character more taken to the extreme, even occasionally, as a caricature of the different and eccentric artist. Alvaro Gutierrez, director of photography, get a magnificent lighting, sometimes almost magic, and aftertaste to the 1970s. The use of a few great backlights superbly supports the narrative thread and the tone of the film.Mikel rooms music, sometimes reminiscent of Western films, offers the perfect counterpoint and musical underscore for a story that could fall on the topic but manages to rise to the height of an interesting proposal that will leave a good taste to all those who dare to see it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/882

Rafa Ferrer

Ratónpolis

muchocine

A great occasion to accompany the "kids" from home to film, with a story that will like them both to us.

Aardman, experts in ocher and clay animation film, are passed to the film in 3D, for deléite of large and small, with this film, debt of others such as the excellent "curse of the vegetables" of Wallace and Gromit (which appear here in two cameos), and "Chicken Run - evasion on the farm", which saves some parallelism, the truth is that the tape WINS integers in original versionabove all by the toad with the voice of Ian Mckellen, since both Rita (Hugh Jackman and Kate Winslet) and Rody give quite the same, perhaps of Andy Serkiss as one of the rats "cronies".It seems incredible that Aardman was able to translate 3D everything what already was in ocher, and is that the dolls do not differ at all that before did delight in his animated film, frankly, plated by them.If there is one point with which I prefer is with its excellent soundtrack, with its images of London in "ratuna" version, and with a storyline that never cease to move things, though perhaps that pace rampant sometimes pass bill to the film.A great occasion to accompany the "kids" from home to film, with a story that will like them both to us.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/689

Enrique Colmena

Infiltrados

muchocine

Solid, well directed, film their usual fluent narrative and the estilazo which is their brand for so many years. Scorsese appears to regain vigor, but certainly does not reach the height to which we had () spoiled.

It is seen that in the end, Scorsese always comes back to the underworld universe, whether Italian, as it has happened on several occasions in his career, or, as in this case, the Irish. "Infiltrators" is an libérrima version of a Hong Kong film (which are already two sequels, no less) in 2002 directed by Siu Fai Mak. The new history scorsesiana poses a double infiltration: an Irish gangster, who has raised almost to her breasts to a pipiolo, manages to put it in the "elite unit" of the Boston police responsible for the fight against organized crime. At the same time, this same unit, the more absolute secret, and with knowledge only two officers achieve infiltrate in the heart of the band of the gangster to one of their own. Both moles will begin to do his work, until the two sides realize that there is a traitor in their ranks, and begins the search and capture of "the rat", as curious and commonly called cops and criminals to their respective infiltrators. In this closed and stifling universe of traumatic relations between police and crime, Scorsese recovers part of the pulse that had recently lost. It is true that fails to live up to its great milestones in the cinema of gangsters (see "One of ours", for example), but also that it is a solid, well directed, film their usual fluent narrative (and used extreme brutality of his characters, is also true), and that estilazo which is their brand for so many years. Is the plot advancing complicating more and more for each of the topos, whose respective salvation must be, theoretically, on the fall of the other rather than their own, although things do not necessarily have to happen thus? It is true that some actors do not help much: Leonardo DiCaprio does not give the role, as much that to make every effort to try to be a hard guy; the same could be said of Matt Damon, to which a high-pitched voice to the Spanish nor can say it will help much. Nicholson is masterful, as it is usual with him, and that which is quite restrained; Interestingly in this case makes his character a little "in the manner of" Robert de Niro, the actor scorsesiano par excellence. In the rest of the cast making Sergeant first with a tongue for ever with salfumán sticks not a repeinado Wahlberg, nor nor Vera Farmiga as unlikely psychologist, when rather have paints and model gestures (throwing to spineless, is true?). Ultimately, Scorsese seems to regain vigor, but certainly does not reach the height to which we had () spoiled?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/250

Oscar Cantero

Scary movie 4

muchocine

Without order or concert, Scary Movie 4 is the worst that has been released in our country since the beginning of the year

David Zucker is one of those directors who were marked by some degrees of success in the Decade of the eighties (lands as you can, catch it as you can). Determined to continue on the path of comedy, his career is has been diluted and deteriorating to offer us a hodgepodge of the calibre of which today opens in Spain. Scary Movie 4 is not or if you want a movie, is just a succession of parodies of other tapes as "The forest", "The war of the worlds", "The grudge", "Million dollar baby" and more. Degenerate, uncouth, vulgar, humor full of histrionics and exempt of originality is its only claim. Its cast is filled with sleepless actors and scarce talent, like Anna Faris, Regina may and the infumable Leslie Nielsen; You can others like Shaquille O´Neal or Carmen Electra not even them be called actors. The so-called teen horror has always been the source from which these films have drunk ridicule them and vampirizan to create grotesque situations from the original scenes. Without order or concert, Scary Movie 4 is the worst that has been released in our country since the beginning of the year, and another insult to the intelligence of the Viewer. It is a mamarracho of dimensions magnérrimas and while some smile starts at the beginning, as they pass the minutes becomes unbearable and boring. The only incentive to see this aberration, that does not serve or to pass the time (its eighty-six minutes look like ten hours), is the move awhile rooms air conditioning cold, or in the company of friends, to laugh and not with the film. Sleeping.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1142

Pablo López

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

Last night made me a trucazo I am still giving laps. I went to the 'other' movie of wizards of the season, the good.

Last night made me a trucazo I am still giving laps. I went to the 'other' movie of wizards of the season, the good. You know, there are times that gather in billboard a couple of movie ranging from same: Finding Nemo and El Espantatiburones, Antz and bugs, Armaggedon and Deep Impact, wild Madagascar. they are almost always children's films, but this time it was a very adult film: the trick last (the Prestige) which has won by a landslide to the Ilusionista.La film, with a bright characterization and atmosphere presents the rivalry between two magicians. and here I can read, because it is really very difficult to comment this film without gutting one of the surprises and twists that has the script for the movie, but if you can say that it has a splendid picture, some performances by Hugh Jackman and especially by Christian Bale very good, and also get Scarlett JohanssonMichael Caine. and David Bowie! Really necessary viewing.The history plays to the mistake during the footage, when you think something, it is just the opposite, and that thought believe that turns out to be an illusion that will then be transformed into the beginning of a new trick. Sometimes it goes well, and other times you'll find it half. The address is correct, very much in the style of Nolan and music meets its mission: her can not be seen.In short, a Nolan of transition between Batman Begins and The Dark Night leaving the Phanes, who are many very good taste.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2196

Francisco Bellón

Enemigos Íntimos

muchocine

Intimate enemies is a type of comedy that not abounds in the cinema today, fun, entertaining, and not offended or makes a mockery of the Viewer.

In almost all aspects of life, there are times of splendor and decadence, and the film was not going to be less. Years Golden in the decades of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, with some of the greatest filmmakers and actors of the history is lived in Italy, the seventh art. In this splendour, as well as the neorralismo they highlighted the subtility comedies starring magicians as Nino Manfredi, Alberto Sordi and Vittorio Gassman.Recientemente we can speak of a renaissance of Italian comedy, with new talents as Carlo Verdone, that not in vain the own Alberto Sordi appointed him as "heir". His latest film, which features the confrontation between Achilles (Carlo Verdone), a bourgeois married a wealthy heiress, and Orpheus (Silvio Muccino), a young man without ambition who intends to take revenge on Achilles for unfairly dismissing her mother reaches Spain. Thus begins a succession of esperpénticas situations and impossible to boot multiple laughter in the stalls. There are really hilarious scenes, such as the sequence of the voyeurs or visits to the hospital of both protagonists. It is also true that romantic tone of the story is slightly fade the intensity of the film, although it does not become a hindrance but a necessary accompaniment. Despite its long duration, slightly excessive for a comedy, the film is agile and pleasant, and the viewer never has the feeling of heaviness or the need to look at the clock. The best moments of the film are given from the confluence of a huge Carlo Verdone that pours the screen with each appearance and a no less brilliant Silvio Muccino, which gives an excellent replica.Intimate enemies is a type of comedy that not abounds in the cinema today, fun, entertaining, and not offended or makes a mockery of the Viewer. It neither falls into the uncouth, but it retrieves the style and those great Italian comedies of the 1960s elegancias. And confirms our best wishes: Carlo Verdone is the true heir of Alberto Sordi.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1279

Verolindapechocha

El perfume

muchocine

I recommend with confidence this film which is full of beautiful pictures and Yes, also powerful odors. In short, a very sensual film.

One of the best things he did for my university education is putting me in the curriculum of a course, the book "El Perfume" of Patrick Süskind as compulsory text. Enjoyment and olí each page of this wonderful story.I was why me I touched up the marrow when I learned that they were going through one of my favorite books to the big screen. I know I said the same thing in my reviews of memoirs of a Geisha and pride & prejudice, but I have many favorite books, I'm not cheating them!I began to see the Perfume, the story of a murderer (2006) with some suspicion because many times the film destroys to literature, but I must tell you that I finished the film quite satisfied with the excellent adaptation of the novel bestseller.Some time ago I read that uraño Süskind had rejected the proposition of adapting his best work to the film, million times and the most high-profile names of the seventh art (Stanley Kubrick, Tim Burton, Milos Forman, Ridley Scott and Martin Scorsese). However, a good day agreed that Tom Tykwer, German director of run Lola run, her lead, of course, by the Bicocca of 10 million euros in return for rights.The perfume is the story of Jean Baptiste Grenouille, born in the most pestífero place on the planet, between the viscera of the fish which his distorted mother sold in a market of the old Paris. Jean Baptiste (Ben Wishaw) has two features that make it "special": it has no smell and you can distinguish each and every one of the scents in the world with total precision. This last don leads him to be the protégé of a famous creator of perfumes (Dustin Hoffman) who retrieves the glory lost thanks to the excellent nose of Jean Baptiste. In return, he teaches you all the secrets of the business, as Jean Baptiste is trying to develop a special fragrance, with which it lives obsessed. The perfume of beauty and innocence. And this perfume has a high cost.Alan Rickman, known for his portrayal of Professor Snape in the film series Harry Potter.Recomiendo with confidence this film which is full of beautiful pictures and Yes, also powerful odors also acts. In short, a very sensual film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2158

Rafa Delgado

World Trade Center

muchocine

Boring, long and heavy film proposal on the attacks of September 11, 2001.

'World Trade Center' found me, and I will say without mincing words in the language and regardless of the topic dealing with the film, a tostonazo unbearably boring, long and heavy. Your pace falls miserably from the collapse of the South Tower (to the quarter of an hour of having started, go). Does not create in any way nor a glimmer of interest in almost all of their footage.Now, intense and emotional is a while (and have not found me much less a "americanada"). Highlight the collapses of the twin towers, which are a bloody agony. And I think a real tribute (regardless of what I have come to bore the film) to all the victims and to all those police officers, firefighters, military. In short, to all those true heroes who gave all their forces in the rescue efforts.The cast is simply correct, although I would like to highlight Michael Peña (Will Jimeno), Maggie Gyllenhaal (Allison Jimeno) and the always radiant Maria Bello (Donna McLoughlin), which I would love some of them will take a nomination to the Oscar next year.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1203

Rafa Ferrer

Virgen a los 40 años

muchocine

It is made with an exquisite taste that despite a topic like sex, I assure you that at any time there are rudeness and boorishness.

One of the most promising comedians from the quarry of the American Saturday Night Live, Steve Carell (seen in the first part of "How God" and future star of its sequel, "Haunted" and "melinda and melinda").We certainly have one of the comedies of the year, not only by the blows of humor, that is and also great, but because I believe that for the first time after a long time we can enjoy a comedy as well as having humor has a good script, which is that with this film you not only enjoy the typical joke, but they enjoy during the hour and 50 minutes lasting film.And it is these films come out from time to time. It could even compare it with great comedies that we all know as "Farewell single" or "Gigolo", because this comedy is sincere, there are situations that any guy feel identified, because it has elegance, because it is sophisticated, and because it is made with exquisite taste, that despite a topic like sex, I assure you that at any time there are rudeness and boorishness.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2714

Caty

Amanecer de los Muertos

muchocine

The great triumph of?Dawn of the dead? they are the characters, archetypes with which everyone can feel identified... all are human, quite solid and credible characters if we take into account the genre of the film and what it wants to convey.

Creativity and innovation are not exactly words that are happened to me over the head when I knew that it would make a "remake" of the historical "Dawn of The Dead" (1979) by George a. Romero, which is why I asked me one thing: does makes sense do a review of a film of mythical lovers of terror unless you want to take advantage of the pull of the title and thus most capitalize?. And when I finally saw this movie, my question was very pleasantly answered.The great triumph of "Dawn of the dead" are the characters archetypes with which everyone can feel identified, the more cowardly to the bravest of the creeping to the more noble. all characters human, quite solid and credible if we take into account the genre of the film and what it wants to convey. Is also a merit director would not resort to a face of fashion which now populate by Hollywood without anything more than offer than his last romance or her dress at the Oscars gala, but used actors of truth, who really believed her roles as Sarah Polley (the adventures of Baron Münchausen), Ving Rhames (Pulp Fiction)Jake Weber (Pelican), Mekhi Phifer (8 miles), Ty Burell (Black Hawk down) or Michael Kelley (protected), which is stuck in the world of the cinema and people who have made dozens of films, leathers dishes based on hard work. It must also pay attention to the effects of make-up, made by Tom Savini, George a. Romero confidant in the original film.It captures the essence of the first film, with humanity full of zombies, of which nobody knows anything, nor as they left, nor why. a group of people given account are the only survivors of an infested humanity and whose only output is or die or flee to Earth somewhere where everything is still normal, how it took refuge in an abandoned Mall (here the director has portrayed the spirit of the original with a critique of the American hiperconsumista society)(, hence that develops in a typical Yankee Mall) and enjoy capitalism more pure and hard, where have all the amenities that the modern world can give them: clothes, food, dresses, weapons, tools, cars, cash. in the early days do what it seems, but always with the terror of having a much higher outside enemy, anything they serve all these advantages when mankind is destroyed.A couple of details I have bothered a bit and are the only ones. One of them is a fairly common "problem" in the current horror films: the excess of visual "cleansing". It's all very aesthetic, and with that goes the sense of realism that characterizes to the mythical horror films, but I guess that this feature goes with the evolution of the times. Another moment that I did not like is the only detail of "moralina" typical American in the film, a license that does not appear on the original tape: when all the characters decide to flee the mall to try to reach the port and set out to somewhere not infected, one of the protagonists risks his life to save a dog endangering the entire group. in the context of the argument does not fit at all, for me it is the blackest point of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/644

Oscar Cantero

Wicker man

muchocine

Another of these adaptations of films of the 1970s which turns out to be worse than the original, with more resources, but with fewer ideas.

I've always thought that the assassination of Kennedy and the arrival of the man to the Moon, the third great mystery of the twentieth century was none other than the fact that Nicolas Cage won an Academy Award. And I never tire of saying that we we have one of the players with less records that one can imagine. If you capture a frame of each of his films, you can hardly differentiate its expression, whether of comedy, action, drama or mystery: always the same face. And the worst thing is that when you try to change the registry, it is even more terrible, because then the only thing that makes is strangely distort the eyebrows, forehead creasing and adopt a histrionic image causing shame others. When won the devalued statuette from the Academy (today probably affects more money spent on promotion to artistic quality to achieve) with Leaving las Vegas, Mike Figgis, director of the film, due to be so amazed that until today, and it's been eleven years, he hasn't done anything worthwhile too. Perhaps to not leave too ridiculous to Cage, the rest of the actors also do quite mediocre work. For a change, The Wicker Man is another of these adaptations of films of the seventies that turns out to be worse than the original, with more resources, but with fewer ideas. In this case with any because it is a calque of the first. In my opinion it is intended to be an allegory which is to see that a world dominated by women would be just as bad as ours, because the evil lies not in the sex of the people, but that it is found in the power that corrupts us. The last twenty-five minutes are quite entertaining; the rest just bearable. You will tell.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2008

Calaf

Spiderman 3

muchocine

Given the precedents and expectations... fiasco.

I have no desire to roll me. If he had not raised such great expectations, was the most expensive in history and come preceded of 2 pretty good parties, we would say it is an entertaining movie that is worth seeing is.But with similar precedents, I dare say that this has been a fiasco. And I admit that I lack expertise to justify it. Because special effects and history is not lacking. However he has left me cold. Too bad (up to 4, including himself) that they become good and vice versa.I liked much music, and some scenes such as the creation of the man of sand. Others, like making cool or dancing Parker seemed ridiculous.Anyway, what is the time and nothing more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/758

Enrique Colmena

Ficción

muchocine

A devastating orgasm, a very powerful however so modestly erotic bomb: a quiet beauty, a delicatessen for film buffs, a pristine piece of art.

CESC Gay continues to grow: with "Hotel Room" was unveiled, a small, almost "underground" film, who discovered a talent in the making; with "Nico and Dani" confirmed its ability to tell stories related to love and sex, with a sensibility certainly striking; with "In the city" demonstrated its ability to discuss everyday issues to various bands, always interested, fascinated frequently. Now, seeing this little gem of recent Spanish cinema which is "Fiction", one recalls inevitably that beautiful love story East titled around the world "In the mood for love", and in Spain was distributed as "Looking forward to love" (see criticism in CRITICALIA), the Chinese filmmaker Wong Kar-wai. "Fiction" runs that same space, albeit in a completely different way; arguably the Chinese film is the inspiration, but the Spanish story has his own way: two human beings, man and woman, both reasonably happy in their respective relations, he with his wife, she with her partner, will live a few days of coexistence in the beautiful landscape of the Catalan Pyrenees; in this relationship, theorists friends, is brewing, no wait, a love that desasosiega. But both do not dare to take the first step, fearful of breaking their daily life, the gentle routine of their days with their respective partners. When both are on screen, which is almost always sutilísima tension is palpable, transcends from the screen in a way infinitely more disturbing than if the couple (who does not dare to be so) give rein to his unbridled passion. The only physical contact, the last farewell Kiss, will be like a devastating orgasm, a very powerful however so modestly erotic bomb: a quiet beauty, a delicatessen for film buffs, a pristine piece of art. Chapeau for the actors, all splendid.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1006

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Mentes en blanco

muchocine

Pastiche sweetened halfway between the spasmodic and macabre thriller of the most bloody gore and competent narrative functionality of the film of intrigue.

Pastiche watered-down halfway between the spasmodic and macabre thriller of the most bloody gore and competent narrative film of intrigue functionality, although it comes rigged with predictable arguments, already old mounts and, above all, the ACE in the manga know that a surprising end to revive ninety minutes of visual laziness. Blank minds play this ambiguity in a remarkable way, everything must be said. It is sister with other products of a similar cut and come, as we see it, pieces of root of Saw (Oh, what school has opened this franchise) or (more distantly) usual suspects. In the Kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is King.There are players of worth (Kinnear, Caviezel, Stormarre) and it did not turn to a staff anonymous in other films of this nature. The script is thorough, alluring, puzzle animated conventions of the genre where premium (as said) the search for an ending which leaves us all flipados online Saw (I insist) or Seven to a well trabada events hilazón and more artisan work in purely theatrical characterization of the characters.Those of the men locked in a basement without having any pajolera idea of the how and the when sounds already known song. These times of creativity flat produce spirited clones. one accepts because, ultimately, it loves the cinema and recognizes that it is not always easy to film the silence of the Lambs (the masterpiece of the adult entertainment) or the aforementioned Seven, that to me feel me absolutely great. Both flashback and as much camera in hand produce hot flashes and dizziness. The construction of the final decoration, the Baroque puzzle show, uses a heavy process of creating parallel reality: none of these realities seduces us entirely.The final question: is it good? In its own way it is a masterpiece, but this way already has staff pinch fed up. We want quality film, but with so much and so diverse, scale that they arracimen on the products good in principle, but bored by viewed Bulletin Board. I am thinking now, leaves vu, which has the same ingredients of competent but lacking an appropriate dramatic tension film.Theatrical in abundance, surprising final, actors in racha, director of video clips (Simon Brand): unknown. And why, then I have the feeling that the film's worth and that take one a great time in the cinema?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2620

Plissken

Wolf Creek

muchocine

Wolf Creek is fiction, but as experience in horror of the real you can find.

I don't know what is more absurd, if brand new Wolf Creek two years after its premiere, or talking about it when any good genre fan her must have already seen, thanks to new technologies. But if you're perhaps lost among the new wave of "slashers" that flooded the screens and do not know for what you decide, the magnificent Australian Greg Mclean film is the very best has done by the genre in a long time.The starting point, however, is not surprising at all: Kristy and Liz are two young tourists English in Australia, accompanied by the villager Ben, travel to Wolf Creek, a huge crater located in the middle of the desert which is 90% of the Australian country. What promised to be a placid landscapes worthy of National Geographic trip becomes a dramatic struggle for survival, with no one to assist trainees of explorers. Because they are alone in the desert, or not?The great merit of McLean in Wolf Creek is to build a tremendous tension around the actors, using the few inches (but powerful) means at its disposal, namely: a few players above the average in terms of charisma and intensity (special mention to a poignant Cassandra Magrath); the imposing enormity of the Australian desert, which from the outset is presented as a place as beautiful as little right to escape from people who want to kill you; above all, the effectiveness and coherence of the script, who plays the trump card of realism reliably much more that things such as Hostel or derivatives. And incidentally, plays with the spectator "veteran" subtly changing the roles and behaviours of protagonists and secondary. Everything with a slow pace, but that cala hondo and makes you worry, really, about the fate of hikers suffered. Greg Mclean films with the precision and patience of an expert, and is his first feature film. Chapeau by him.Another of their distinctive points is MIME which has been on the technical Bill and the setting, both through the image (courtesy of the unknown Will Gibson) and the sound and, especially, a music that perfectly accompanied changes in the script (in charge of the more unknown yet Frank Tetaz). The natural scenery accompany and are perfectly set to give as a result that mixture of desolate landscape and wonderful trap for unwary.To give you some but to the magnificent Opera prima of Mclean, a couple of moments they are resolved to the old and foolish style of the American "mataadolescentes", what removed you something of seriousness to the proposal; and the tagline of "based on a true story", well, then I guess that it will attract to someone else, but I think that it is not necessary. Wolf Creek is fiction, but as experience in horror of the real you can find.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/191

JPastor

Xmen3

muchocine

The third installment not disappointed, connects very well with the second part, and also deals with one of those great moments in the comic book saga

Although no criticism is objective, is it less because during a good part of my childhood and youth I was collecting comic books, and which I liked most were probably those of the X. So the arrival of this group of superhero films, as in the rest of Marvel characters, gave me much vidilla. It passes through the big screen has been uneven in the first two installments, with the first part which in my view was low in characters, and some serious errors in fidelity to the comic then have been dragging in subsequent deliveries. After seeing the three carried out so far I am aware that the second is, in my opinion, the best. Extremely entertaining, very successful at technical level and with those background stories that haunt all mutants of comic books and that precisely they gave that touch to the Marvel Comics. A friend told me long ago that prefers movies of Spider-man, which develops the facet of the character hero as his private life, something which is clearly true since it is not possible to do the same if there is about 10 characters in the movies of the patrol still so, the third installment not disappointed. It connects very well with the second part, and also deals with one of these great historical moments in the comic book saga. Those who have read them already will know what I mean, and probably being something surprised by the consequences of that fact, I, certainly did not expect. These fringes which is finally resolved in the third part of the patrullosos give cause for an interesting argument, but I think that it has been too complex to carry out to the end. The massive confrontation with dozens (hundreds) of mutants has been tested both the direction and the technical realization, except in that paragraph is impeccable. The special effects are as good as might be hoped, but do not give rude when suddenly you find that the X is has to do with dozens of superpowered remaining in super at a glance, and now. Massive battles are something ridiculous for something obvious: give each doll's powers and combine them to make a "coherent" battle between mutants is unthinkable today despite the technical resources that are available. So the director wisely mixed flat generals in which sees the mutant running and jumping (which does not distinguish them any BraveHeart battle) with the most specific in which Wolverine, beast or storm struggle with some bad that do have prominence. All previous events lead to these spectacular (although somewhat incoherent) final minutes, and obviously yours is that you see the movie, so I I ahorraré the details of a story that hinted at seeing the trailer. Finally appear many members of the X we we in lack, but I do not understand why the writers are still with those "infidelities" comic. And those who do not wish to spoilers, stop reading now. Pícara character, for example, which did not convince me from the beginning, becomes the Bridget Jones team, a personaja in the comic has an impressive character (although obviously is concerned about your problem in maintaining "relationships") and in the movie not it goes from being a niñata to all the confrontations has no role whatsoever. Inexplicably disappears Nightcrawler, a character who moved perfectly in the second part and which have been "replaced" by the beast, that it have been great, that Yes. Appears Angel, but as if not do so, and colossus, one of the most anticipated, barely appears although we finally see you a little in his role. Also get Kitty Pride, well determined almost everything except in who should be having circulation of junk, and bad stresses Juggernaut (who appeared more in other series, mainly against Spider-man). Pyro, for example, has an importance never had on the comic, and indeed the actor does not convince me too, looks too young in a kind of obsession with the writers (or director, or who knows) by would have duels between counterparts: in this case, obviously, with the ice man (or rather, the guy from ice). Less evil to save the mediocre is the great magnet that has brilliant moments, including the reference to its relationship with Charles Xavier. It is curious as in some things they have respected the comic perfectly, and in others her have cagado so brutally. But as you say, it never rains please everyone?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1455

Oscar Cantero

Diamante de sangre

muchocine

Balanced combination of social reporting and commercial cinema, following the fashion of the film complaint that benefits billionaires.

By combining the adventure with the documentary and social reporting, and of course with profit, comes to our screens blood diamond, starring Leonardo DiCaprio in constant search of himself, Djimon Hounsou Éragon (La Isla) and directed by Edward Zwick (Traffic, the last Samurai) and the always fresh and correct in his interpretations Jennifer Conelly (seeds of bitterness)(, A beautiful mind). Blood diamond is above all a drama that is located in the bloody and brutal do anything any non is? civil war that ravaged Sierra Leone in the 1990s. Set for a good photograph, which includes places without peers and dominated by a hectic pace, not we have the classic film that could well have stayed in a documentary and little more. And is that blood diamond is shot with a huge commercial vision, and not only by its main protagonist terceto, but also for the dynamic tempo, the dialogues somewhat "rears" to our theme, taking into account that all except Jennifer Conelly make Africans. Trafficking and smuggling of diamonds has been a genre which has given many titles to the film, and this is just one more. It is not a great film, but it isn't a horror of which have lately been supporting. Perhaps a bit long, almost two and a half hours, but they made quite bearable. The bad and the good thing about this movie is that it makes you think about the status of the human being, of the value of a life in the abandoned continent and how far it is able to get the man by the money. And I say good because something that encourages you to think is virtuous; the trouble is the conclusion to which you arrive.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1343

Jose Contreras

En busca de la felicidad

muchocine

There are people who need adversity to live. People that delivers the application when the deadline has passed, but you need it desperately, people expected the embargo to pay the Bill, people who go stressed to the quote when you have time to prepare it. There are people that kicks with calamities.

The French Revolution and the American Constitution were inspired by earlier thinkers such as John Locke (1632-1704), formulating his social contract rights to freedom, life and property. Thomas Jefferson added the list to the American Constitution in the version of Samuel Johnson, which had changed the third for the right to happiness. And this is how it is today.Says Javier Ocaña in the country the films starting with "Based on a true story" announce a farfetched story. We would come if you play the primitive to a hero of a movie out of the film outraged. And however it plays every week.Chris Gardner, the protagonist of "In search of happiness" is a man in distress. His wife leaves him with a five-year-old boy, he sells bone scanners. You need to sell two to pay the rent and to muddle through. Put fines will be collecting as seals. The world is cahoots against him, a day is a trap, another day is a hippy who stole a scanner, another day is the police, and another is the landlord who fails to pay, or a friend who does not return him a debt. Sometimes, it happens from time to time, something good.On the other side is his dream. Chris was good at school, and dreams of becoming a broker. Take your request and does everything so that a signature accept it in a course. But do this course means spending six months without charge and he has to keep a child. 20 Candidates who have just the course only will hire one.Muccino tells a wonderful story of calamities. Create a character with hook knows fit blows and who knows making fun of their own misery when he can, as in the interview: ("what'd you if a man submit to the interview without shirt and we gave the post?") But he can't reward it. You don't know because you don't know it thoroughly. Muccino has not known to many Chris Gardners. There are people who need adversity to live. People that delivers the application when the deadline has passed, but you need it desperately, people expected the embargo to pay the Bill, people who go stressed to the quote when you have time to prepare it. There are people that kicks with calamities. Give them a life quiet, a good job, a calendar with all calculated and you've finished with them. If Muccino wants a happy ending (the real end, already know, are unlikely), can not tame the hero, because we have come to love him with their adrenaline chutes and their misfortunes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/153

Jose Contreras

16 calles

muchocine

Impeccable argument to have you glued to the screen for an hour and a half

The argument of 16 streets is impeccable for have you glued to the screen for an hour and a half. A detective should lead to an offender to testify to the Court which is sixteen streets of distance. On the way they are shot and discover that the boy will uncover a plot of police corruption and his own teammates want to kill it before you arrive. The short distance enlarges every minute the police cut them the way to grow the tension.Bruce Willis is the honest policeman who fights against yours in a fit of honesty that cannot contain, role that usually makes. It is also drunk in hours of service and has gut, these defects that disfigure him for the first time, and hopefully that for last.The question became the filmmakers was both an offender risk worth it? Although the story is a zacchia flight urban, the item that beats is the better the life of the boy. Willis says very clear that everything in life changes, but people don't change. He wants to show him Yes. Anthony Mann shot almost all of his westerns to give reason to the boy. None is missing a capable of reformed gunman.In my opinion that thematic question was not the most timely. The question that I had done to the detective would have been: do Era that the time change? For the boy Yes, but it is less clear to the detective.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/704

Jesus Lens

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

A great idea embodied in a grayish and sadder movie. Interesting, but all exciting or compelling.

The starting point of "Children of men" is absolutely fascinating. Instead of pointing to the end of the world in the traditional manner, by the melting of the polar ice caps, a nuclear war or a devastating plague that threatens to brushing your baby's gender human, part of a premise more simple and, precisely for this reason, more disturbing, more uneasy: simply, women stop having children. They begin to have abortions and to not become pregnant and, suddenly, humanity is doomed to an inevitable end for revocation.In fact, the film starts with the death of the person the world youngest, a boy of 18 years. The funny thing is that, true to its ancient history and when approaching the end of the world, human beings are especially prone to violence, blood, confrontation and war. Britain is plunged into chaos, with caged immigrants, in the purest style of Guantánamo. Everything is grey and looks dirty, neglected and abandoned.And in that world, a girl of color, a Fugi (tiva), becomes pregnant. And the various factions that compete for power in England want to flag of the child, which found its best champion and protector in an enigmatic and individualistic losing that endorses the mission to mother and child safe, taking them to a ship that would lead them to an unknown destination in has been launched a project between utopian and hopefuldo: the bad Humano.Lo project is that with so good mimbres and an exceptional cast of actors? Would Clive Owen, Michael Caine, Julianne Moore? the film is not so interesting as it should have been. Although the approach is fine and is formally shot with accurate dryness, there is too much salad shots, too hasty escape, too much action in a film which should rather have sucked and appealed to the reflection.Because, above, the action is not to be a prodigy of pace, precisely. I like the last battle, shot almost in the manner of a video game, with the documentary aesthetic of the news on TV. I like this kind of miracle, as everything that has to do with men, only lasts a few minutes. I like the end, without excessive forced dramatismos.However, throughout the central part of the film, the command of the fish and other I was boring and dreary, without claw, as fulfilling a mere formality between the approach of the story and its outcome. Incidentally, the infamous dubbings of the main actors is not contributing to make this part of the narration more attractive.In short, a great idea embodied in a grayish and sadder movie. Interesting, but all exciting or compelling.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1070

Dario Lavia

The return of Doctor X

muchocine

A horror, the film Bogart gestated in a time Warner was, if we are allowed to the expression, a "machine for sausages".

It seems simple today disqualify films such as the return of Doctor X by narrative poverty and his refusal to produce bemusement at the public. But we must bear in mind that the film was concocted at a time Warner was, if we are allowed to the expression, a "machine for sausages". Usually producers sought to satisfy the public generating films of social theme, westerns, adventure, the always police and, eventually, some terrifying film. So enjoyed a roster of players under contract on which seemed a kind of lottery raffle above who you played which character. That seems to be the only explanation to understand to Humphrey Bogart in a horror film. Warner appealed to old success of the House, DOCTOR X (El Doctor X-1932) that marked the first alignment between the "mouthed" Fay Wray and Lionel Atwill. For 1939, with the resurgence of the genre (consolidated from several interesting Universal films), Warner had no intention of staying outside, and this is how we have a "return" on this ténebre Dr. X, that while it is not a proper sequel to the 1932 film, pivotea in several matching points, namely:-synthetic blood: remember that in the 1932 filma mad scientist used "synthetic flesh" - the role of a journalist: Lee Tracy of 1932 (too witty and funny) succeeded by Wayne Morris of the film occupies us, less interested in becoming the funny that in investigating the case - of course, the presence of a "Doctor X", in this case Bogart, that carries the same name as the character of Lionel Atwill (although without kinship) A stage actress (Lya Lys) is "killed" and a reporter (Wayne Morris) gives the scoop to his newspaper. However, the next day she appears with life to deny it. The strange fact arouses their curiosity, and together with a young doctor, friend (Dennis Morgan), gets to investigate. The chance to be one of those involved the renowned Dr. Flegg (John Beal) whose Assistant is the strange and cold Quesne (Bogart), who is none other than the fearsome Dr. JFK, that needs frequent doses of certain types of blood. Bogart newly makes his appearance in the 22 minute of the film and is director Sherman wanted to equip its presence with ominous climates, because of the speed with which seems to have been filmed, never achieve. In fact, the final 4 minutes are a prodigy in concise narrative and more than an outcome seems a summary of the outcome (which obviously takes expected suspense). Its similarity to the outcome of the subsequent if die before of Awakening (1952), can still be checked by Carlos H. Christensen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/791

Jeremy Fox

Scoop

muchocine

One of those small movies that Allen likes to do from time to time; light, entertaining and fun. Adjectives that are, to be honest, the best that can be said to a comedy.

After the enormous satisfaction produced by "Match Point" (link to critique in Moonfleet), expected eager the next film of Woody Allen to see if it was still in the same line of the previous or changed record.Outside expectations, Allen has decided by a light comedy of those he does with your eyes closed and may be a part of the public unfairly, leave disappointed. The film features the research that, based on a peculiar tip-off, performs a student of journalism (Scarlett Johansson) to discover if the known aristocrat Peter Lyman (Hugh Jackman) is the murderer of the tarot. The rookie journalist will have the help of a Wizard of second row (Woody Allen).With size argument not to expect anything other than a light comedy of entanglements in which Woody Allen offers the best of himself and shows that he has not lost an iota of his comic vis. Each one of his appearances on stage is a gift for the Viewer. To me, just to see how it moves already gives me laughter. At his side, Scarlett, ducks and fun without losing a bit of its appeal. The other characters, let alone worked in other Allen films, exercising of mere comparsas although they are equal (especially Ian McShane).As I say the script works as a clock of intrigue both his comic part although, as in all good comedy, what we least import the identity of the murderer. If we add this to the pace at which Allen knows to give to his films and the facility that has to tell a good story in an hour and a half, we will have a slide show that is passed in a sigh. It is clear that comparison with films such as "Manhattan murder mystery" would be quite uneven and unfair because it seems clear to seeing it, that Allen did not intend to make a film as well. Instead, we have one of those small movies that Allen likes to do from time to time; light, entertaining and fun. Adjectives that are, to be honest, the best that can be said to a comedy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1474

Florinda Chic

Inland empire

muchocine

Lynch has been a little bit assembling nightmares, as in dreams, lacking any consistency. Is this film a bullshit? I do not know, is subjective? is a painting by Miró bullshit that would make your five-year-old nephew? Yourself.

If you ask me did you like the last Lynch?, I would say Yes. If added then her you recommend me?, the answer is? Neither of coña!. Mainly because I don't like the represalias.¿Y by what this contradiction? Do because some parts of Inland Empire me excited, because I am a fan of the director and I like how in this film parodies himself, because I respect his right to the waiver and? because got me free.Lynch has made what has left of his zany brains without taking into account that the Viewer - even started his world - a ration of three hours can be indigesta. The film has no rhyme or reason, aim brilliant stories are always in the air and if salts of the room mulling over this mental homage to Onan you've seen you end up ten minutes in a psychiatric.Next to Inland Empire, Mulholland Drive and head Borradora have a storyline so affordable as of Yo soy Bea. But the moments of the episodes of Rabbits, the action of Grace Zabriskie, the music, the sequence in which the chinita tells the story of his friend who has a monkey for pets and a homeless yells: Why us accounts that shit?, are great. It could follow a few lines because 180 minutes give much.In overall, between the initial thrill some of sopor halfway through the footage, turns that you know that you will not lead to nowhere and other? the only conclusion is that Lynch has been a little bit assembling nightmares, as in dreams, lacking any consistency. Is this film a bullshit? I do not know, is subjective? is a painting by Miró bullshit that would make your five-year-old nephew? Yourself.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3144

Rafa Ferrer

Mr Brooks

muchocine

An I want to and can't film it reaches Spain 5 months too late.

Without a doubt we are before one of those movies with true Costner, Hurt, renowned actors Moore. It will delight lovers of film and that however and after a promising start it is diluted as a spoonful in hot coffee.Let us not deceive ourselves, are dealing with a well built, well filmed tape and bebe a diversity so great sources that surprise the most painted, too bad that that diversity makes the tape a disservice, since, while the home is promising, in the end stays on a laughable belt, some stupid comicamente moments and wherein spite of trying to give the script not 1, but 2 laps of script, makes water always and at all times.It is curious as the villain at the beginning of the tape is hero and villain heroin and attempting to change the roles that one is not more than put face of cousin and concur, over and over again with such great and at the same time embarrassing circus quasi so many times (more difficult still).The direction of Bruce a. Evans, respected writer ("Count on me", "Starman" and "Cutthroat island".), here debuts in address work looks more like one of those "commissioned" works where the director is not more than a mere figurehead or man of straw, that endures estóicamente shower, placing both Costner and Demi Moore, in the best moments on screen and holding the pull of what is approaching, in this script is also fruit of Evans and stays "middle piston" hoping to be that which had to be and was not.Highlight in addition to those already listed 2 television, Danielle Panabaker (as daughter of the protagonist that we now see in the series "Shark" as a daughter of James Woods) and the mythical-CSI Las vegas Marg Helgenberger.Resumiendo and still concise, an I want to and can't film it reaches Spain 5 months too late (in the USA release was in July).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3906

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El último show

muchocine

Aesthetic Epitaph, almost a masterpiece without greatest aspirations that the recreate a world gone, lost in nostalgia, the laziness that all get to cuddle by the beauty, by emotion...

Independence also has his tender side, the autobiographical time incorporated in a format añejo, prone to melancholy and soft transcendence, without sounding phrases extracted from some gigantic billet of philosophical maxims or any gathering of gurus of the mìstico which underpin apocalyptic thesis with the fragility of the world.Robert Altman has signed a tender, autobiographical, añejo, melancholic and transcendent, soft, alien to the excess, conveniently reduced work of unnecessary dramatic tension. All knowing that would be, in effect, the last show, perhaps the last of truth, without larger curls of the language.The last show is a formidable Opera on late payments, on the need to detract from the seriousness to which, indeed, does not deserve. It is also a beautiful testamentary note that the director has bequeathed to benefit of moviegoers and people of good will. Outside this gesture, there is only a movie, a strange, as a whole, too stubborn in their original point of departure: the last performance of a radio serial in an old theatre of varieties that is about to be demolished to become a parking lot. The glories of the radio that enliven the farewell do not exhibit no shame in doing what they know, ignore everything smells of demolition and that the show, the old and friendly ads and white country songs pass, has expiry date and they have just ahead.The belongings of the film, its most relevant apero, is the daily life of death, its absolute normality. Altman, the unpredictable, fickle man, which fluctuated genius (Mash, Vidas cruzadas, Gosford Park, Kansas City, the game of Hollywood) to the more frivolous crappy or the pure tedium (Pret a Porter) wanted this kind of posthumous work versase (by the way of Huston in Dubliners, although desaureolada of pathos and literature) over concerns of an artist who faces death and departe with her the reasons for the settlement, the privileges of the transit through life and misery that accompanies any human act by the mere fact of being ephemeral. So the actors of this beautiful decorated theatrical piece of country, emotions and Surrealism (the angel who wanders, erratic, in search of company) offer an intimate, cheerful wake times, colored by the reflections of life itself. Fiction uncomfortable more than reality, someone wrote. We accept the real, but it hurts the fantasy, the result of the talent and creativity, free spirit and artistic creation to offer material it disturbs us. Here it disturbs the ironic gaze of the master, which represents its own vital to driving with ingenuity dismantling and infinite love the demolition of alien which, in this case, is what always brought pleasure and to consecrated life, movies, stories, the choral world of characters who exert emotional hinge between the euphoria of living and the infamous certainty of death. Altman flirts with the tragedy, shines a couple of timidly affected scenes of any depth metafisica (the fair) and solves the cocktail with the kind assistance of the nostalgia of some appetizing romanticism which helps a memorable Gallery of characters and a script simple, minimal and practical, where raw material the anecdote, the episodic detail, loose more than the complete poem verseas if a hatillo's stories were and the director had emerged or assembled in a book of images. So the closure of the theatre, metaforizado, foreshadows the death of the creator, the omniscient Narrator, who does not hesitate to interpolate the sarcasm, the thin fabric of a crude humor, sometimes, subtle, in others and the already rare short stories (short cuts, sound it?) created the useful atmosphere so you not bored us (because that is a rather than present danger) this well-intentioned filmlower interest, but big (huge) in emotions.Rest Altman beyond where it is: perhaps the memory of who we enjoy some his work, their relatives and friends, said; give barracks hagiographies, but this is not the panegyric which probably deserves.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/303

Calaf

Poseidon

muchocine

Typical movie of disasters, action and tension in which the characters imported little or nothing and will that if we do not expect much help us to have a good time

Last night I was one of the most promoted summer releases. This Poseidon is not a remake of the famous movie of the 1970s but a new vision of history. And I have entertained dry (uff what more wit have been ready to write.). Let's say it is the typical movie of disasters, action and tension in which the characters imported little or nothing and that if we do not expect much will serve to have a fun night of summer.Do not think that you will see something similar to Titanic. What is more, except some few levels of the ship at the beginning, at the time of the disaster and in the end, the rest are sequences of interiors, with the tiny group of characters trying to survive with minimal concession to personal relations between them.It is not that this is negative, but let us not deceive ourselves. The tension is well shot (the director is Wolfgang Petersen, of the little valued the motion perfect) and caused and almost everything is plausible. I think that the character of Richard Dreyfuss (Millionaire homosexual) entertains the majority of the public, although it is of use and tirar.¿No you think a pity? A shame because after an interesting start in which is about to commit suicide, minutes later gives a kick to the type argued in the elevator shaft to be saved, lol. But then they forget he and I did not hear a single line of dialogue more. And he is an actor that I think it deserves much more. The guy this thuggish with all the earmarks of Matt Dillon in something about Mary, isn't a little absurd? I gave the feeling that wanted to hire Matt, they gave pumpkins and in revenge so ridiculed with his brother (did not know to see her, but it is his brother, Kevin Dillon.)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/425

Kiko de España

Clerks 2

muchocine

Clerks II has nothing to envy to the best work of Jersey, with permission of chasing Amy. It works perfectly without being a sequel to explicit.

He said week on Monster House it was a movie as before, fun and emotional, that would be a piece of our hearts forever. Clerks already occupied and I dare say that, more than the movie itself, what we remember fondly is, in general, the universe Smith. Because well, Clerks II has nothing to envy to the best work of the Jersey, with permission of chasing Amy.Clerks II works perfectly without being explicit sequel, almost, is a tribute to these two subsidiaries of life we are all without being the cartoon (fun, but cartoon) it was Jay and silent Bob Bob.The characters continue to operate as they did little more than one decade ago and now also have a lot of things to talk about (because this is a movie for people who speak.) (If Randal hear me I'm dead man), although in general, speak of the same: sex, freaks and film Trilogies. And of course that there are cameo appearances. And of course it is fun. In fact, the very bastard bearded has me excited at times, note that if that becomes greater (without falling into the fussiness) boot, with transition from black and white to the included color, great. Kevin is still alive. 8. (and no, I have not seen Jersey girl)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/813

Silvia Giner

Los fantasmas de Goya

muchocine

Another movie that happens to clog up the list of movies that do not have more nothing

Another movie that happens to clog up the list of movies that do not have more nothing. Slow pace and few resources for a simple story in which Goya (Stellan Skarsgard, Pirates of the Caribbean 2 and 3) is represented as a simple guebón with Bardem get better interpretations of this film, absolutely boring and tedious. Bardem, works the voice please, lately you always hear the same key for all the characters, big mistake.Come with my beloved Natalie, I cannot be objective with it, I can be her beauty, is that although does not say anything to my I love his eyes and distracts me completely, even I can say that unfortunately it is not the best that has been done, is much better in V for Vendetta. Here it passes without penalty or glory. Feel me pathetic double interpretation mother/daughter, but that is blame Milos Forman clear.Amazingly poorly directed, say surprisingly because I have to Milos for a great director and I do not understand this slump of the director. To highlight the costume, the soundtrack gives headache. The title of the film does not refer to what was then shown, is more one story of unrequited love more than anything else. I thought I would show more interior painter hell, but not? the is simply one pawn.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3036

Bruji

Sin reservas

muchocine

The interpretative duel arriving to engage actors actresses, the proven melomanía of the director of?Shine? do and flawless adaptation of the screenplay, end up doing's?No reservations? a film treat? comme il faut?.

American version of "Delicious Martha", the German production which, in 2001, we not only conquered by the stomach. The interpretative duel that arrive to engage the actresses actors, the proven melomanía of the director of "Shine" and flawless adaptation of the script, they end up doing a film "comme il faut" recipe "Without reservations". If we remember the guapa-francesa - drawing-animated appeared in Ratatouille, we asomamos the character of Martina Gedeck in Sandra Nettelbeck's original story, and look at the determination with which the great Lady of Douglas statement that "all their dishes culminate comme il faut", we came to the conclusion that all the "chefs" of world cuisine are women of arms taken. It is possible that thus are all great professionals from five continents. And it is also possible that this attitude towards life not adept at a natural instinct of protection, but a studied survival exercise. More, as Ortega y Gasset said, "the River opens a channel and then the channel enslaves the river", accurate explanation that could justify the misnamed work addiction and his worst result, fear for life, itself, which has not given time to Gregory. "There is no cookbook for life." First of all, we should not confuse the Viewer. Although so you've marketed, no reservations, American version of "Delicious Martha", is not a romantic comedy, because neither it was the story on which it is based. If seek gender is, just indicate that such recurring argument must be understood as a vital witness, like everyone, take implicit drama, and the sense of humor as a necessary mechanism for compensation. Its purpose is none other than the approaching that subjective and abstract, concept that is constructed from the inside, called "happiness". "The soft breeze that, occasionally, clears you face", as used to define what flags, International Malaga. At this point, would be irresistible to think that such an argument, - by everyday and massively exploited - could be so insubstantial within a film adaptation as the own production that it contains a inconsequential "romantic comedy". And that is where all the predictions fail. Paraphrasing his exquisite script, "life is unpredictable" and, fortunately, the film also is, so the recipes some invented, against all odds, stand as the best. Bless are managers that, even in our days, are capable of entering a genus overused, stripped of its clichés and unpretentious protest, achieve elevate it. Obviously, when talking about "some" we are not referring to "any". Scott Hicks marks a milestone in the history of cinema with Shine, have the biography of an absolutely unknown pianist, to make him famous. Otherwise, would typically be echoing the biography of a musician already enshrined. No reservations, it confirms that his foray into the world of music was not casual or timely, given that one of the major successes of the film now Orchestra, is based on the proper use of the soundtrack. The score by Philip Glass - of itself, overwhelming - it will be wisely mixed with important pieces of Opera performed by the Pavarotti himself, that, seasoned with various popular topics, they erected it, in not few moments in the footage, in absolute protagonist. In the good kitchen, so masterful ability to find the key to the perfect dose, so only an example of the interesting combination that houses the rest of the tape between the various technical and artistic aspects ending her composing. The restrained use of voice-overs; accurate photography of interiors, which makes the most of the few outdoor spaces that allow filming to capture the beauty of an unknown New York, and a careful art direction that recreates the ins and outs of a non-existent restaurant, alternating with spectacular interpretative duel between the naturalness of the little Miss Sunshine and professionalism of one of the biggest divas of contemporary cinema. "The magic enters in scene," exclaimed Jack Lemmon rather than lowering the clapperboard. The magic comes from a scene of Traffic, in which the Ballerina beauty, that many believed Latin blood, pronounced with plausible coldness a "Volar him the head" which impacted in the retina of many moviegoers who we swore her loyalty. The magic that makes absolutely expendable to her male partner. When she fills the screen, even keeping in mind Lords of the stature of Connery or Clooney, who it is not?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/326

Antonio

Silent Hill

muchocine

The movie respects throughout the atmosphere, aesthetics and the characters, essential elements that have achieved the "Silent Hill" series is one of the most respected and plays.

When a veteran videoadicto as I have to see the adaptation of a game to the big screen, it goes through a sense of pleasure resembling that invades you when you hold the command and switch on the console with your latest acquisition videojueguil. Unfortunately this sensation diminishes and transforming into disappointment according to the film are goes away more and more not only of the original idea of the game but also its aesthetic of his characters, his "charm", in short everything what did a great video game. And it is that adapting is never easy. A video game has been designed very differently to a film, although increasingly both genders give the impression of converge slowly.For all these reasons I didn't much hope with "Silent Hill". Well, at least not was directed by Uwe Boll, profanador of jewels like "Alone in the dark", which encouraged me a little more.The beginning, quite typical, shows us a sleepwalking girl nearing death. In these times of sleepwalking, the girl (from The Ring, all girls scary movies are equal, when a blonde short hair girl?) believes that he is in "Silent Hill", so his mother, in an attempt to cure his daughter will take the people abandoned under mysterious circumstances. It would have been much more intelligent by the girl say "Disneeeey Woooorld" instead of "Siiiilent Hiiiill" in these bouts of sleepwalking, but clear, rather than a horror movie we would have otherwise.From here, start to happen strange phenomena in Silent Hill, where exciting moments of action occur when darkness seizes the town where constantly raining down ash and more relaxed moments where we know something more about Silent Hill, without never bother us that overlap between stories. The characters are well made and characterized by their peers (those who have) video game, emphasizing Cybil, the police, appearing as curious note at 18 of the 20 characters more gay video games (http://gaygamer.net/index.php?s=gayest), what nonsense list.The movie respects throughout the atmosphere, aesthetics and the characters, essential elements that have achieved the "Silent Hill" series is one of the most respected and plays. Disconcerting at first, until that we fail to half do not know very well what goes the plot, very characteristic also the game. Finally! a worthy adaptation of a video game.PS: the zombie nurses could have given more game, apart from the "1, 2, 3" English hide and seek.PD2: Buff, illusion out Tito Chinchán blog. I hope not to disappoint, even if not at the height of this experienced critic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/723

Elena Suárez

Scoop

muchocine

The argument is not interesting, actors are outlandish and not think, or make you laugh and already known jokes like Woody Allen since starting to smell like the wagons of the Madrid metro in rush hour.

When one you have always said that he is a genius, it should come a time in which one believes. And when one is believed to be a genius, the arrogance and high-handedness be obscured by the objective view of the quality of a work. Something similar occurs much with the so-called liberal professions and, specifically, with particular virulence in the world of cinema. How many actors know that his major contribution to the camera is the teach bait? And how many directors, forgetting that your product will be distributed in a film and not in the Hall of his house, room are left embelesar by the compliments made by pseudointelectuales vassals?This preface is a case in an attempt to explain how a course director of the quality of Woody Allen may have done so excessively boring movie as a Scoop. Honestly, isn't this one of my favorite directors, but the fudge I witnessed a few days ago in the film is of considerable dimensions.To start the base is not very good that the plot isn't interesting (a student of journalism receives from the more beyond the tip-off about the identity of a serial killer), this idea is taken with too much linearity, so much that half of the movie you know what will be the end.The actors are outlandish and not think, or make you laugh (in fact, is something that has always done Woody Allen; let us not forget that in addition to believe a good director also believes a good actor, because presumably see a man so ugly with a so deadpan face going to cause a lot of laughter).All this is accompanied by well-known jokes like Woody Allen already start to smell like the wagons of the Madrid metro in rush hour. If we mix all these elements in a Shaker we will obtain a result poor, boring and of dubious quality, or what is the same, Scoop.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/462

Javier Moreno

Salvador

muchocine

Huerga defines with splendor and dose of great film the attack on the freedom of a historical stage. A lesson of how Spanish quality filmmaking.

I am 26 years old, I was born in 1980 and my knowledge about the war Spanish civil and Franco's dictatorship are reduced to the fine strokes that my parents have been easing me in stages of historical concern, seasoned in a terrifying story that my deceased grandfather narrated me a summer in Malaga, their participation in the army against the "Reds" Franco as the called them during those three years. Told me everything that lived in Andalucia, front, even had access to a newspaper that wrote. 40 years were needed so that that individual squat, vileness in its purest form, no power, less time we needed to forget that many lived and that many are unaware. There is some phobia by patriotic cinema to recover memory historica of a dark age that belongs to us, that we should not forget, and I don't know the reasons, but it is when less disheartening that new generations born under the protection of freedom that promoted democracy, successively forget the events that led to a few to fight for their freedomagainst the oppression of a totalitarian and fascist state, which now all deny and which in turn almost all supported. Starting with those politicians that servian to the Franco regime and now hide after a political party and autoconsiderandose the most democratic State (we all know that Manuel Fraga was Franco's Minister). Outside that would be wonderful that those who defended 4 decades of terror, ask forgiveness, would be essential to our comatose Spanish film, be banana imitations of American by-products, and they devote to make cinema of quality, in which would accommodate recovery by the cinematographic language of those dark events that led the human condition until his most despicable shabbiness. Just for young people that we must build the future, must not forget what happened in Spain, nearby events in time, because at the end and all... 25 years, are not so many. And that is precisely what makes Manuel Huerga's Salvador, roll back to the last rales of the dictatorship, in which a young anarchist was sentenced to death by a State which wanted to demonstrate, following the murder of Carrero Blanco at the hands of ETA, that they still had power and after a trial full of shadows.We could argue about whether Puig Antich was a terrorist or a liberator, but this controversy was perfectly clarified in V for Vendetta, thesis that I support fully, because low specific circumstances in which the right of the inviduo of being, being ignored, the fight must be just to ensure that at no time were tread rights more universal of this society.Without the th effect of names like Almodovar or Perez Reverte, Huerga defines with splendor and dose of great film the attack on the freedom of a stage historical I repeat, never forget. Shot in a high definition format (something like what Michael Mann), surprisingly has a fast-paced rhythm and no lapses or in scenes apparently more inconsequential. Are the sequences supported by a really anthology soundtrack, with themes of Lluis Llach, Leonard Cohen or that sensational Knockin? do on heaven? s door de Bob Dylan. It rate accelerated, accurate and without blur the action at any time which we are witnessing, being perfectly placed on the screen anytime, without losing in impossible barullos that do not contribute anything to the implementation in scene. Surprisingly the film has two distinct parts, all that huge flashback detailing economically the beginnings of Puig Antich in the revolutionary movement, and the segment from which ETA kills Carrero Blanco and the young anarchist is aware of that executed it. And I say surprisingly because the fine line that separates both segments is so splendidly diluted at all times we have an amazing sense of continuity, with its consequent difficulty to elucidate on that point had just the first section of the film. Hit by the director, which supports with a dirty image and cold, the recreation of a completely different world that we know, and that brings not only proximity, but also a clear effect of realism rarely seen in these parts.The players are to feed, with the exception of Leonor Watling (that even this so more than correct) whose profile is not all defined, even the side such as Celso Bugallo and Ingrid Rubio they scratch at high altitude, but above them rise two names, Daniel Brühl and Leonardo Sbaraglia, which can already start preparing their speeches, because the Goya it not removed or God. In the case of the German actor, say that his interpretation is excelsa, is staying short, restrained throughout, repressed (and feels) the feelings that emerge in, with peak at the time of the execution, where its interpretative overwhelming lesson is get up and not stop applauding because he delights one of the moments more somber and emotional moments throughout the film (and can leave the audience in a sea of tears). In the case of the Argentine. I have no words, the few scenes shares with Brühl are anthology and brilliant, we perceive the evolution of the character, and every time the camera focusing on him at the moment more dramatic, causes a lump in the throat, of 10, especially when he attends the execution of Salvador (it not destripo nothing of the film, right?,) which rises in the 120 minutes of footage as one of the scenes most recent shocking Spanish filmloaded of a drama which forces to withdraw the look of the screen, and it is embarrassingly pathetic. Really, the last 30 minutes of the film would be by in its entirety, film quality and echo with the soul, even so, should not be denied that it is probably unnecessarily elongated.After both praise the film, would have to stress that I consider the black look of the film, the ambiguity that it is the authorities of the State (despite certain remnants of humanity in certain characters). In the movie the bad guys are bad, and except in specific cases, in any moment we perceive or a minimum of humanity, is to generalize too much IMHO. Admittedly, I do not know until that point the film is faithful to the facts, until that point is adulterated history, nor is it something that is very relevant when we are witnessing a lesson of how Spanish quality filmmaking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1997

José A. Peig

Piratas del caribe

muchocine

Bathed in sinister dyes as well as bufonescos, transports us to a world in which the sea and those who populate give life to a universe which dream. As in a book of Stevenson, in good cinema of adventures, importantly give spectacle, a show with a soul.

When the curse of the Black Pearl reached the charts around the world, a certain mental state had already set in the minds of lovers. The Decade of the nineties, bland in what film show is concerned, it left us a bitter feeling (for some alleged Vanguards of high intellectual Crest, with Lars Von Trier, heading the new moves) and the eighties began to establish itself as the golden age to which a worship of nostalgia. In the 1980s the big three Trilogies which, since then, were and will be the model to follow, the canon for a well done entertainment film saw the light: Indiana Jones (Steven Spielberg), back to the future (Robert Zemeckis) and the original trilogy of Star Wars (George Lucas, Irvin Keshner and Richard Marquand, more the invaluable work of Lawrence Kasdan and star Bracket in writing). In 2003, the film by Gore Verbinski put an end to a wait. In General, the comments of a large part of the public came to say that "by end, a film adventures in conditions". In conditions, I would stress. The conditions are the canon. And the adventure genre has a few golden rules that never fail: you don't have to be original, gives life to the characters, encouragement epic plot as a whole and the camera translates into an absorbing visual style (pace, mounting, framing). Fun is served. On the basis of an immortal icon, the figure of the pirate, of great importance in the history of cinema as literature, the industrial giant Jerry Bruckheimer produced a product planned and designed to become one of the biggest taquillazos of the story (it is on its way be). The fact that this icon has a fascinating power that tune in a special way with the adolescent and youth audience is not a question of tastes or trends. The pirate, as icon, idealized figure and archetype, brings together the concepts of rebellion (understood, for the youth sensitivity of our times, wild life, anarchy, "hooliganism"), freedom and adventure. Not in vain, in one of the scenes, Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) runs in verbiage that reminds us of the famous "the pirate song" of Espronceda. Pirate remains a hallmark of romanticism, that magic, that mystery and worship a mixture of admiration and contempt for an immoral and adventurous life, well tuned with the assiduous popcorn young public and the hobby without adversity with people of all ages, all including, those who grew up in the heat of the sword of Errol Flyn and those who did empuñándo the lightsaber Luke Skywalker. The smell of Bruckheimer made no mistake: Jack Sparrow, as well as the remaining cast, es-son a strong embodiment of the romantic archetype of the pirate. but a new varnish, to undergo more pulp, more Kitsch, banalizando - is only an assumption - the figure of the pirate for a consumption faster and easier serving the commercial structure of cinema today. It is nothing new: the key to the success of the original Star Wars trilogy was a play, based on talent, heart and enthusiasm with Archetypes of the tale and universal legends but "putting them in crates" to the taste of the consumer on the basis of a socio-cultural moment very concrete. By Verbinski we cannot say too: shows know the scope in which it moves and is a correct executor of the idea made by Bruckheimer, inspired by a Disneyland attraction and a video game, "Monkey island". History: between the legend and the folletín pseudo historical, it tells a tale of pirates and pirates. Little Elizabeth Swann (Keira Kinghtley) opens the function while he recites a chant of exaltation to the pirate life. It is the sign that announces what will be the end of the narrative, in which the same representatives of royalty and the order assigned to the charm of a pirate on the run, a maid and a blacksmith apprentices in the life of the sword, the freedom, the Buccaneers and the lost treasures. As we have pointed out, romanticism involves the narration in order to squeeze the maximum this charming aura of the pirate. The argument is based on historical facts which are revealing as the action progresses: a group of pirates in search of the Aztec treasure. There was a mutiny to banish Captain Sparrow, who will be left to their own devices on a remote island. William Turner, known as "Bill the boots", decides to be faithful to the pirate code and disobeys the orders of Barbosa, acting against the mutiny against Sparrow. Barbosa sent to "boots" into the depths of the Ocean as punishment for his disloyalty. When the greed of the Barbosa group leads them to steal the gold, the Aztec curse falls upon them. The only way to undo the spell is to return the gold and the blood of Turner, whose son was abandoned on the high seas with the piece of gold that will serve as a connection to the past and the present narrative engine. As we see, the story has all the ingredients of a pirate legend that could have existed in the popular folklore of the time. Verbinski introduces us not only in a mere history of pirates, goes beyond that and forge a pirate legend in which the two worlds of fantasy and reality, seem to live together following rules: Will and Elizabeth are the reality of the present. Barbosa, Captain Sparrow and other crew of the Black Pearl are entities slaves of the past, a past of betrayal, mysteries and enchantments: the curse of barbosa and his, which prevents them to taste the rum (expressive and grotesque the scene in which the rum drink slips between the skeletal Barbosa tripe) or the perennial madness of Sparrow. However, the film always keeps a humorous tone which refers to the pure entertainment unpretentious excessively dramatic: there is something of desolation in these pirates sentenced to an eternal death, history runs smooth, but without wanting to take too seriously to itself, in which raw the show by the show, the dramatic nod, witty dialogue and gesture spoof auto. Spectacular visual energy looks all the iconic elements of the piracy at frenetic pace: fantasmagoric and ships with sails to the wind, the waves of the sea beat on the mast and the bow, the anchor at the bottom of the sea, the buzz in the duels between swordsmen, the rumbling, and the artillery of the guns, the paradisiacal beaches of the Caribbean, the cave of treasure. The appropriate orchestration of all of them - in a montage certainly irregular, because the slippages of pace was quite noticeable in some sections - translates into a mesmerizing spectacle in which the viewer almost can smell the gunpowder, felt the violence of the battles between Buccaneers or evoke the magic of a Navy legend. The cinema show, more solid and mature content from an intellectual point of view, consisting of sensations and evocations. Obviously, every viewer lives this pirate adventure in images in their own way, and some can even be bored on the way. But Verbinski film has enough elements to evoke sensations (which are at a good adventure movie) and represented with a visual style history, as a minimum, striking, and a structure, as a minimum, acceptable, that is something unquestionable. Tastes, as we say, have nothing to do. They are characteristics and inherent to the own film creation textures which focus our discourse and our assessment of the House according to standard. The film also bears a romance between Will Turner and Elizabeth Swann, and settled in the purest classical style, with a final kiss after tension sustained throughout the 150 minutes, which is a virtue, eliminates any excess sweetener so prevalent in this type of production (you want to-kiss-you want to-kiss-you want to-kiss.). In the film adventures, the characters can not fail. The authenticity, freshness, sharp dialogues. In that regard, perhaps the results are somewhat unbalanced. There are two actors (and two characters) that, without a hint of doubt, fill the screen and give character to the story: Captain Jack Sparrow and Barbosa (Geoffrey Rush). Seems that Jack Sparrow, over time, is becoming an icon of cinema of current entertainment and is one of the most original characters now in its scope (come on, a character that cannot be said to be a plagiarism or rehash of topics, to possess his genuine style). Johnny Depp's eccentric and enigmatic personality comes as ring finger to configure a héroe-antihéroe which stands at a neutral point between the interests of each other, giving the character of an ambiguity that well complements your bufonesco profile and your intentional self parody (Sparrow is a pirate of volume and spine, but, moreover, he derides his own condition of pirate.) Note the reader what does Sparrow is a parody of Errol Flyn. In her personality embodies the spirit of the film: a story of epic legend which, at the time, does not take seriously itself. ). Part of who's captain Sparrow?. We will not know until the final minutes of the film. Taking into account that cinema adventures does not need complex characters to work and meet their target, a character like Sparrow is a luxury and a puntazo the franchise. The characterization adds an attractive, some ways and a physical appearance that combines the masculine and the feminine, and gives it a certain air of androgynous. Barbosa did not say much more: simply a wrong with claw, sense of humor and nasty, antithesis of Sparrow, what is bufonería and parody, Barbosa contrasts the seriousness and the traditional pirate conduct. Keira Knightley makes a correct work, but their records and his physical are overly stereotyped, with which the character loses much freshness, and it shows in the overall result. The other major problem with the tape has to do with the Assembly work. The footage is excessive. If instead of 150 minutes lasted a few 125 I would save some slippages in the pace and the feeling of adventure would be more emphasized by winning in fluidity and interest. As we see, it does not reach a perfect finish, but "The curse of the Black Pearl" is an achievement for the recent film adventures, the best discovery in the last 20 years (which is not to say much taking into account the almost total absence of productions in this genre, and the garbage to which we are accustomed). And for his detractors, want to say very clearly: beyond each with its gustos, but it is hypocritical to not recognize the virtues of this adventure film when nobody question the merits, the quality and the myth of in Raiders of the Lost Ark. We are not saying that one is going to have the significance and the depth that had and has the Indiana Jones trilogy (time will tell), but if we look exclusively at the properties and intrinsic characteristics of each of them, if we want to see defects in one, them can also be found in the other. Idem for the qualities. The curse of the Black Pearl, an adventure on pirates and the iconography of his legend, bathed in sinister dyes us while bufonescos, transports to a world in which the sea and those who populate give life to a universe which dream. As in a book of Stevenson, in good cinema of adventures, importantly give spectacle, a show with a soul.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1497

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Días de cine

muchocine

Not by a film we will massacre the Spanish film. We do not with others that also deliver such garbage. Spanish film is raising head, but then comes a title in this manner and her clench...

Model of minimalist, short or diminished or reduced to four critical ideas primary and three secondary beneficial the same idea: the film is bad.It takes lifetime el bueno de Antonio Gasset with his great days of film now do a film with the same title and above, is bad with greed. It has nothing that deserves to be considered good: gets carried away by the film scurfy, simple to the naïve and Brutus as a kick in the noble parts us has been accompanying for a long time, and that still (occasionally) emerges.It is bad, because it has been said: very bad without benefits that slow the opinion. Trembles so terrible: will be liked in previous films (days of football, the other side of the bed and company) and here wanted to loop the loop, in the end, discuss squaring of the tomato and the encouragement of the statues.So this is going to become a critique, in a review of a spectator pleased or furious, more so than in a warning: do not go, do not lose time in the cinema with a crude history like this. Take out their children for a walk through the parks. Stay with friends and divaguen on the goodness of the Bus policy. Establish a strong Covenant with his common sense not to let go by advertising and perpetrate such nonsense again. And if film of what they earn, if it truly is that, I have a tasty bunch of fleshy grapes made frames. Now I think of Apocalypto, I do not know if it still resists in billboard. Or Kubrick's Lolita, with this nínfula of ambiguous meats and eager to be perverted by a Professor of Germanic literatures. I say.Not by a film we will massacre the Spanish film. We do not with others that also deliver such garbage. Spanish film is raising head, but then comes a title in this manner and bends her... Oh, and how...

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4337

Yojimbo

Rescue Dawn

muchocine

The director pretends its players to a Port Aventura in Laos. A genuine physical and psychological torture that impresses the spectator.

A friend and I have dubbed a war cry after seeing this film: "Werneeeeeeeeeeeer". And it is that we imagine that it would be the cry insistently repeated the actors during the filming. Director Werner Herzog pretends to Christian Bale, Steve Zahn and Jeremy Davies to a Port Aventura in Laos. A genuine physical and psychological torture that impresses the spectator. This modest film comes with a simple argument but a treatment and a realism in your images so impressive as daunting.Bale is a fighter pilot that falls in the jungles of Laos during the Viet Nam Guerra. The vietcong him aprensan but it will end up in a prison camp where you find other soldiers being there awhile. The pilot, with great decision, decides to escape and invests his ingenuity and commitment to get out of there, even with the other captives.Although the film appears to be a telefilm, the quality of the implementation and interpretation, as well as the realism of the setting, manage to get into a movie more than the Viet Nam with few elements, without too many helicopters or napalm explosions. It does lack. It is a small story in a great war, and the small stories are many differences which mark. A delicate, paused and emotional music by Klaus Badelt accompanies terrible images of file of a forest devastated by bombs. This contrast will be the note to mark the entire film: the story of how to keep calm or inventár is when things go disastrously wrong but also how to solve an untenable situation. And no one better than Christian Bale to play the pilot. One of the finest actors of the current scene.One of the great virtues of the film is the commitment of the director and the cast for putting in situation to the spectator through risky scripts and dangerous characterizations staying in the bones, literally. And for Bale are two, counting of the driver. An effort worthy of mention.Although the argument is something repeated in many war films, this is achieved suffer with prisoners and participate in their plans and celebrations in silence. A beautiful lesson of survival and struggle to not fall into madness.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/159

Verolindapechocha

Hostel

muchocine

Is human dissatisfaction which seems to grow and need more drugs, sex and anything that produces recordables emotions

There I read on another blog a post about this movie which read simply: "Trash". While I do not think not even close to Hostel (2005) to be the best movie of Quentin Tarantino, I not be a waste.Hostel is on the search for the man by the extreme sensations, trafficking of human dissatisfaction which every day seems to grow and need more drugs, more sex and more anything that produces recordables emotions, thus be perverse experiences, as it is the case of this film. I think that I will not ruin the film nobody, because it is clear from the preview, writing that the film is about torture. Torture as pleasure.It says that it is based on real facts, I can not believe it. I do not recommend this film very sensitive people. If you are interested in the dark film, extravagant and intelligent Tarantino you should see it, but if you lose you nor do you have to cut the veins. You don't Kill Bill, Pulp Fiction isn't, not stars Uma Thurman, but as any other work of the author, it has the same amount of blood than these.However, noteworthy name in capitals of Tarantino attributed to this film is not as true, he was only one of the Executive producers and certainly gives the Insert marketero. But the real culprit, I say copyright, is a subject called Eli Roth, who directs and writes the script. This same Lord Announces Hostel 2, same theme. Currently in production. My humble opinion is that it does not deserve a second part. Eli Roth kept a blog during the production of hostel, if you want to read it click here.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1826

Rafa Ferrer

La ciencia del sueño

muchocine

The best translation to the celluloid that occurring in our bed when we close the eyes, essential and advisable but not power.

It was one of those movies that one has a kind of personal fascination, and yet does not dare to watch it by fear, prejudice and other stories, in most of the criticism I read described the film as "Martian" word that held back dry desire had of seeing her, I finally armé value and said, come and let's see if I agree with the vast majority, and started its screening, my opinion may not be more satisfactory.I had never seen a more solid and effective way to translate in images something as complicated as it is "the language of dreams", and that says a huge Gael Garcia Bernal at the beginning of the film, dreams are composed of thoughts randomly, reminiscent of the day, mixed with some memories of the past, love, passions, emotions, and all those "ions" on screen, the music heard during the day, things which we have seen and also something personal with these patterns Gondry, for the first time without Kauffman, builds us a comedy romantic (to use) where the guidelines to follow anything have to do with what we have seen previously and that mixed in a mix, displayed reality and dreams, hand in hand.It is easy to watch her and see some other dream that we suffered viewers have had ever, to accompany the French Charlotte Gainsbourg and Alain Chabat Gael which many recall as Julius Caesar in Asterix.Resumiendo movies: the best translation to the celluloid that occurring in our bed when we close the eyes, essential and advisable but not power.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2951

Tito Chinchan

Desde que amanece, apetece

muchocine

Absurd film about a kid in the deep Asturias emigrated to the capital to become a man. The argument is infumable, and the cast of actors not only burden over a project that should have died before birth.

Since the sun rises, fancy. The title is certainly encouraging, but more for a film of Pajares and Esteso than a film of 2006. And of course, if it is not full of aunts in pelotas, as it seems the subject loses enough. I have to admit that I have not seen whole, given that at the time I decided to search the deuvedeteca another animated, that there is nothing worse than a film of humor you embarrassment.The film is about a young lad of an Asturian people who sent to the city to make a man with his uncle. This is a local nude male, and certainly don't agree the shipping do you. But his next woman (Loles León), who wants the boy to stay. And I, is that I removed to the desire to make the summary.Let's see, Gabino Diego has been with Torrente 2 Cuco, and does the same gestures than yesteryear. Arturo Fernandez, although leave with cocks drawn in the chest, still sobreimitándose to become a parody of itself. Loles León I do not like anything good, and always has that role of dominant woman bitter life that sends much and that I can't stand. Then I get the trupé of gigolos, nothing less than the "hard" companions, "hard" UPA Dance (the son of the witch Lola), one Tuesday and thirteen, and two more. And adorning some other Spanish actor of these comedy don't finish to finish. With these actors, what we want to leave? Caca.Resimiendo, absurd film about a kid in the deep Asturias emigrated to the capital to become a man. The argument is infumable, and the cast of actors not only burden over a project that should have died before birth.Since the start you want to remove it.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2395

Iñaki Bilbao

28 semanas después

muchocine

Good movie genre that takes on its own personality through the good making Fresnadillo.

Good continuation of "28 days later", which was directed by Danny Boyle and here co-produce the film, giving the labrum of targeting the Canarian director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. The reason for this is that Danny Boyle liked much "intact", the first film of the Canary Islands. "28 weeks later" has much strength, with first fifteen minutes truly terrifying, daunting leaving without breath to the respectable.Once laid the seeds of terror, we are witnessing a good tack process of human feelings on family stability, threatened by the virus of fear on family guy. The latter is important for the future of the story, which continues with a seemingly unpleasant narration, given the many flat camera in hand, but give the wanted aspect of necessary confusion, fear, terror and panic. The camera stops when it should and Fresnadillo composes a poem of nightmare does not search public complacency, donating to each character that fate had reserved for him.Through an ochre photography, and a delusional and respond soundtrack us one and terrifies with such basics as the follow-up to down the stairs in the dark at the foot of two characters in the London underground or the real time gore and acojonante the meeting between spouses (pride in his short role as Catherine McCormack).Good film genre, which may have is slightly acutely Decompensated, with some slightly cheesy moment between the two brothers who both want, but containing excellent scenes, such as the helicopter "passing the scythe" in the field. Wonderful last level, which leaves no room for doubt.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1146

Rafa Ferrer

Pequeño pero matón

muchocine

The film certainly won't to history, since that from beginning to end is more absurd, rallante and uncouth than one might expect, but anyway, are 90 min. entertaining, which, a priori, they forget as they visionan. Fast consumption and little else.

Simple comedy, with some other dotted, that explores the basis of an episode of the classic Warner, one in which Baby Herman (famous for his reappearance in "Who framed Roger Rabbit") gets involved in house of a few gentlemen that confuse him with a baby. After this madness are the Wayans Brothers, famous for their rendition of "Scary Movie" or "Two blondes hair on chest", the staff side to emphasize the presence of the blonde Brittany Daniel, which have seen in countless comedies. The film certainly won't to history, since that from beginning to end is more absurd, rallante and uncouth than one might expect, but anyway, are 90 min. entertaining, which, a priori, they forget as they visionan. Fast consumption and little else.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3216

Francisco Bellón

La Joven Jane Austen

muchocine

The young Jane Austen is an elegant film, with a great taste, which does not fall into the romantic drama or biopic conventions.

One of the authors whose novels have been adapted to the big screen on more occasions is the British Jane Austen. For many, the best author in the English language from William Shakespeare, and for others, a simple writer of early 19th century romantic serials. So it is not surprising that a film that portrayed his life is controversial by nature, and even if the lead actress is American.But with the young Jane Austen, his director Julian Jarrold does not sign a current biopic nor made up the type of argument that might be expected. Jarrold flees from the conventions, and only focuses on the years in which Jane Austen was just a girl who dreamed of becoming a writer. It is counting its fight against established social standards and the romance with a young Irish man, relationship that marked the literary work of Austen. As a result, Jarrold may show how the author's own experiences influenced his later work, introducing the tape some passages of his most popular novels. This narrated with great elegance, without losing the good taste or a true classic aftertaste of more intoxicating. Despite their almost two-hour, history is not heavy or dull, rather than flying with a pace that allows to enjoy each scene with calm, without slowness or haste. Technically, the tape has an impeccable invoice, since late 18th century environment is recreated to perfection. But all this would have lost if not for the fabulous interpretive staff of the film. Anne Hathaway outboard his interpretation of an insecure and inexperienced Jane Austen, giving it a great humanity and tenderness through a sober and content work. James McAvoy also performs a brilliant interpretation of a rogue Hustler with, Yes, a Fund of goodness and nobility. And what about actors such as James Cromwell and Maggie Smith.La young Jane Austen is an elegant film, with a great taste, which does not fall into the romantic drama or biopic conventions. In addition, it allows to enjoy the work of Anne Hathaway and James McAvoy, two young performers will give much to talk about in the future.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2753

Kiko de España

Macabro

muchocine

Many things for 20 minutes. It is based on real events, do not say more.

Well, that two or three risotadas I stick with macabre, ochentera (because it is 1980) work first by Lamberto Bava which is impossible to explain without gutting, so you you jodéis **.Those who do not want to read already know.The thing starts with an Earless banner that awaits her husband leaves to gigs to go to see / fuck a guy with a mustache who died decapitated Fred to get out of a curve when concucía to any host with the banner Earless co-pilot on the way to her house because her son just died drowned. at the hands of his devilish older sister of thirteen or asín. Many things for 20 minutes, so the rest of the movie is from the point of view of a blind man who hears at night to the Earless (and now mad) banner, because it has been depending on the five-year overview and the movie an anno dopo. in a fucking insane asylum practicing sexual intercourse with the head of Fred, that keeps in the freezer the very bitch.In the end, in a tour de force progioso (indeed, if you see up to 15 minute of movie and jump to the last four you see everything) of little more than five minutes, the Earless banner kills his daughter (drowning her, as no, but. and blood?) and gets to practice sex with the head. The blind her surprises and kills her in the oven (!). Then you hear a breath. the blind man is approaching the bed. and the head bite you the jugular. Fine. is based on real events, do not say more. ** lovingly and with care. Seriously, it is made destripada with love so go to the grain if you get to see her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3665

Kiko de España

Soy leyenda

muchocine

One of my favourite books always comes to screens. It is not an unmitigated disaster, but almost.

More similar to The Omega man than to the original story by Richard Matheson, I am legend is a forgettable updating that skips lightly the original work so that its director, Francis Lawrence (which prepares a version based on snow white and the seven dwarfs, GLUPS) contribution details cool (or that think he and Mr Warner) and the result is irregular enough to forget about the movie when you're on the subway.Robert Neville is the sole survivor of the planet. A virus has finished with the human race and those who have not died now are vampires (digital, why? what about Rob Bottin, Tom Savini and Greg Nicotero? not to serve?!)Neville was a brilliant scientist who worked on the virus and is now immune and spends time with his dog Sam, "rent" movies at the video store and do push-ups. It also seeks a cure, clear.With an interesting startup (Neville hunting in full Big Apple) and an unnecessary flashback for more inri divided into three segments (the third is Fireworks, it is to repeat a level of Smith crying) the movie forgets the original, self-destructive and decadent, environment to get (with the largest shoehorn I've seen in my life) two or three sequences of action and some impossible to ignore scaremore than anything by the volume.And now a couple of notes to get you to Matheson of the head before entering the cinema. The novel starts such as well: on those cloudy days, Robert Neville could not know when the sun set, and sometimes they were already on the streets before he regresaraEn the film, Neville has alarms that alert you when the sun sets to be able to "cover" well House Windows.Other: Was a tall man of thirty-six years of age, of English and German descent and blue eyes and brillantesEs the fresh Prince of Bel Air. And it has a dog. They have changed the sex of the dog and the breed of the protagonist, except that now here come the gañán of Dennis Hopper and let go me the history of the aubergines.Good levels of the deserted city, the best of the movie and little more for a failed attempt of wanting to do something "brainy but box office" because, let us not deceive ourselves, the film nor appears to be a vehicle for mass view once the resolution of the plot, or if?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1053

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Déjà Vu

muchocine

Leaves vu makes us Holy Communion with mill wheels, as I said my grandmother. Huge wheels, in this case. A huge mill, I'd say. Once swallowed the sweet, do not feel bad, in the background.

Now in action films beats the pulse of political cinema. In this Deja vu of Tony Scott there is a film of hondísima political concern which takes 11-s its material for reflection with popcorn and coca coca light. Does not create the gentle reader will swallow a farce of deep parliaments. Nothing of the sort. In a movie with the label Bruckheimer are interested in that the Viewer is two hours glued to the Chair, are interested in that the arguments are not excessively complicated and, finally, interested in that feeling ever, under any circumstances, is that the money has been squandered. The dance of genera that Scott tries to sneak us (thjriller, drama, romance, science fiction) not happy: shows an enormous effort check a competent, entertaining film, but it is damaged in the more rational level, which is the likelihood. In this sense, the film is a disaster. The tool of technology that makes it possible to observe the past is frankly absurd. Ignoring that functional resource, Deja vu is an appreciable film of enjoyable consumption which is left wanting at its final stretch, but hence (in excess) to the ramplonería argument when it comes to fix its fragile narrative concepts.The character of territorista (Caviezel) is completely wasted. The short strokes on his patriotism and his sense of duty towards a decidedly lost America could have given a huge game, taking into account the excellent actor who represented. Leaves vu makes us Holy Communion with mill wheels, as I said my grandmother. Huge wheels, in this case. A huge mill, I'd say. Once swallowed the sweet, do not feel bad, in the background. It has Scott forms and ways of director splendid (fire of revenge is a formidable film) and Denzel Washington is an actor of the first order. Then where is the error? They are the fifteen minutes, or were more than language metaphysical-paranormal that we slip of Rondon so we can understand what the time travel and the screenings of the past. In other films, even in other less successful than this, films are not concerned to explain both the magic of the deception. We simply cheat. Without both verb. Does anyone remember Frequency?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/500

Jose Contreras

Mi super ex novia

muchocine

The comedy works when creators imagine the Supergirl in bed or, worse still, jealous, and works much better when he mix everyday situations with the excesses of the fantasy film.

My super ex-girlfriend has less interest as film of the genre of superheroes, which does not provide much as sitcom, which added to the desmelene of the superpowers. Uma Thurman's character is a superhero that fly and save the world from time to time, but is also a neurotic woman who becomes possessive when it falls.The film dares with this taboo subject which is the sexual lives of superheroes. The comedy works when creators imagine the Supergirl in bed or, worse still, jealous, and works much better when he mix everyday situations with the excesses of fantasy films, such as the occurrence of the car. Drama, which looks only in a couple of scenes, almost reaches incisor when he explores it is what makes us dreaming be magnetic and answers that it is this appalling powerlessness we feel when not we want it to.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3327

Bruji

El sueño de Cassandra

muchocine

Allen is still gaining momentum even when it does not exercise of Woody Allen. The ability to jump between genres, narrative concision of the scripts and the film silverware, always highlight in a panorama which lacks such invaluable aspects.

Woody Allen is still gaining momentum even - or especially - when it does not exercise of Woody Allen. The ability to jump between genres, narrative concision of the scripts and film goldwork which characterized his work, always highlight within a panorama - current - which lacks such invaluable aspects. The latest installment of the trilogy London is no exception...And the curse of Apollo fell upon Cassandra, daughter of the King of Troy. Their dreams would prophesy misfortune than not be believed, pull the destruction. To lovers just them the mention of certain city, evocative of nostalgia, to remember the lives of the Princes Eric Bana and Orlando Bloom. Then, only it should be expected that the title of the film was put randomly, wondered if perhaps powerful Aphrodite was, and reach the conclusion that the world of coincidences was never a constant in the original universe of its director. With Woody Allen, "very improvised" is just the result of "very tested".In any case, it would be interesting to try to analyze the dream of Cassandra from two different points of view: under "the prism of psychoanalysis", which would lead us to compare it with the rest of the recent Filmography of its author; and, on the other hand, as a film which premiered at the 2007 year. The findings might surprise. It is possible that all the other was the prelude to a creative crisis that seems to be submerged the director of Annie Hall. Compared to the whole of his work, the London trilogy seems mediocre, unchecked productions that him notoriety into fame. While Scoop does not happen to be a "nice" adventure, in Match Point is limited to relocate an American tragedy to the city of the Thames. And it is the originality of this history, nominated for an Oscar, only such in its outcome, after showing an approach reasonably similar to which George Stevens develop in 1.951 from a novel by Theodore Dreiser, a film he titled A place in the Sun. However, and in the worst cases, it is not difficult to verify how the unexpected twist of the new Allen, the modern classic, the compulsive director capable of shooting at the speed of the 1940s, continues gaining momentum among the new generations of moviegoers and - very interestingly - among all those which we never support him. Perhaps for the dream of Cassandra, in the line of Match Point, the claim of Allen has been the adapt a Greek tragedy - this time with much more success - to our days. To do so, uses its vast capacity to offer the viewer the same candy always with different packaging, by resorting to the obsessive idea by sex, the injustice of el capricho male when repair in the personality of a woman below her waist, and a reflection on the deranged psychopathy of the world in which we live, so present in his work. Similarly, relies on his innate ability to describe the characters with only a sentence achieved: "I am ambitious, self-centred and difficult", both reminiscent of many descriptions of the unmatched Deconstructing Harry. Continues with an accurate portrait of family, widely discussed in Hannah and his sisters, to offer that anecdotal view of multiple lovers who seem to be so and it are not magnified with the introduction of one of these events worthy of framing: "the family is the family, but there are a few limits". And culminates with the mastery demonstrated in crimes and misdemeanours to unite two parallel plots, to a serious perspective - not without humour - refer to moral status elasticity human: the appalling fact that haunts some, is easily assimilable by others. All this with a film absolute disregard for the English capital, which Spielberg cinematographer fails to avoid, so far from the love which shows by New York City in the master Manhattan.Si the dream of Cassandra is seen as a film by unknown director which premiered at the 2007 year - necessarily - ends to draw attention. The originality of its approach, its acute dialogues, the strength in the structure of the script, excellent measurement of time, proper rhythm that unfolds the plot, the marvelous direction of actors (the performance of Collin Farell is credible!). they are not common in contemporary cinema. Such is the mastery that follows a product which is not drama, is not comedy, is not thriller. It isn't anything but convincing, sorry for forgetting to put a vehicle damaged on the right side of a British road; alarming failures of script, which makes shine the Sun after dinner and watch three different times on the clock of Ewan Mcgregor in a plano-contraplano of twenty seconds in duration; and the irony of showing the Anglo-Saxon characters always smoking in public places. You can not yet smoking in such strict city, "does that life is great?". Even for Bonnie and Clyde was, and although they do not give desire to invade Poland with this new Opera, there is no, nor the slightest doubt of his genius.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/912

Bloody Will

Déjà Vu

muchocine

Do we have a cross of?C.S.I.??Public enemy? and?Back to the future. ?Déjà Vu? It is a purely summer movie that has crept into the Christmas calendar.

Gentlemen, we are facing a crossroads "C.S.I.", "Public enemy" and "Back to the future". There is nothing. I wasn't very sure if the main premise of the film was to see Denzel Washington behind a terrorist plot, and at the end you realize that nothing at all: what really is travel through time. This film is a perfection of Tony Scott on the work of Tony Scott: fast, continuous action and the aesthetics of the best Jerry Bruckheimer productions. "Déjà Vu" is a purely summer movie that has crept into the Christmas calendar, and as such must be seen. Why was a box office failure?, perhaps help you understand after reading this criticism.To continue talking about need to know a bit what account Scott: Agent Carlin (Washington) is in charge of the investigation of an event that I will not disclose. This event is as cruel as inexplicable, by what the different tracks followed by Carlin carried it a new method of research of the Government that will provide the possibility of altering the course of the time the protagonist? and as I said that, here I can read.It is difficult to not gutting important aspects of the film, since otherwise a very broad synopsis you would look askance Scott intentions. When you attend the step-by-step story development going entering what really wants the director to the public: to accept that reality can be so fanciful as possible. Let me explain and return the thread of the three pillars and references of the film. "C.S.I.": investigation of Carlin is as accurate as the forensic television, and it shows the hand of Bruckheimer in these parts, not in vain is the creator of the cathodic franchise. It is a very effective remedy, but my "déjà vu" begins when I've seen too much Grissom to surprise me. "Public enemy": obviously the emergence of several mice library with predilection to monitors and satellites evokes in me the magnificent Seth Green film made by the own Tony Scott with Will Smith and now copy in a way obvious, but clear, is how is copied when you're the original creator?. And you tell it from "back to the future"?. Impossible not to remember it in the last third of the film. I shall count.The theme of the time travel is as old as cinema and this film will not discover anything new; However, play with this genus carries things the have very well tied until the end, and you could say that after more than half fairly consistent film, everything is going to hell in the last half hour. In the end everything with regard to 4 days and a half (you already know what I am talking about) is reduced to a couple of hours, which I have not come to understand. Many Capes are loose and the final resolution has been accomplished because there is no other way to end, but not because everything is explained.Quite apart from the always controversial topic of logical or not logical, other aspects of the films are undeniably entertaining. It is not a film of policy or of human feelings. Denzel Washington mauve a brutally real role in magnificent "El Fuego de la revenge" of the same director, and is now introduced in the fantastic solving the ballot in the same way. When Denzel gets seriously we know and avoid the role of poly hyperactive with liquid metal body. I must admit that I begin to tire of always take the same attitude of mujo I in his later works, but I will not put any but until that it's not really tedious. Least the villain of the film, which is superb despite not to disclose their identity, the rest of the casting is, as usual, erratic. Val Kilmer leaves enough to be correct, and Paula Patton is this discovery that we will see in the next few years starring in genuine blockbusters. Adam Goldberg takes over Jack Black and Seth Green left on "Enemy" and I must say that this actor has always been one of my favorites after embody the psychotic partner of Joey in "Friends". An efficient counterpoint to the always airtight Washington. maybe so many films a year make me a little more punctilious, but despite all the holes remaining at the end of "Déjà Vu", not you can discuss you action takes you in aloft until the 2 hours and 8 minutes to take you to Tony Scott tell a story that, as a good translation of its titledo, makes you remember a few more, and for this reason perhaps the public turn its back spot already thousand times, and this despite the fact that the mixture, rebozo and agitated applied to product finish leaving it new, tee?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1560

Torbe

Apocalypto

muchocine

El bueno de Mel Gibson has just made a movie that reminds me to other movies such as Rambo, or Predator, when the dam becomes Hunter, mud, water, traps, the jungle. Even resembles a little straw dogs.

El bueno de Mel Gibson has just made a movie that reminds me to other movies such as Rambo, or Predator, when the dam becomes Hunter, mud, water, traps, the jungle. Even a little resembles Paja.El dogs problem I see in this kind of movies is the historical rigour. Gone are the days in which the teachers we they placed a movie so the students learn things. That's thing already of the documentaries from the history channel, because in the movies we see each attack against the terrible history.And this movie is not going to be less.For those who you have seen the movie, is not how a few Aztecs pick up prisoners for their sacrifices to a quiet Mayan village, and as weapon of God because he escapes one. The movie is exciting and super entertaining from beginning to end, and I recommend it strongly. Few movies are done so today in day, the truth. With that realism and that pace. The movie makes us what we have always been, some warriors and hunters who gave laps through the jungle killing bugs. Thousands of years have been so, and I think that the movie, like because us back to our origins.It is one thing that catches my attention much think this movie that he never won an oscar. There is no dedicated stars, nor the language is English. (they speak in Basque language all the time, or a dialect of this). I like the Mel has passed all and gone to a movie different, colorful and hyper-realist, because you think everything that happens.The problem is when internet is consulted and is researched a little about the history of these peoples, one realizes the cultural trampling and the desproposito that it has been this movie. Here I spent some of the things that squeak in the movie: - the architecture of the city is a mix between Petén and Puuc, both with 200 years of difference.-at the arrival of the Spaniards, the Mayan cities were completely abandoned, however in the movie it appears full and in construction-experimental archaeology investigations have shown that the sharpened Obsidian has the ability to easily cut slashes of flesh and blood, however in the movie just leave bruises. non-lethal-in some scenes the mercenarions use Macuahuitlis, the weapon of the Aztec Legion by excellence, the Mayans used Spears and axes-many weapons are reduced to a stone tied to a stick - most of the characters in the movie used bone ornaments directly embedded in the face. Although worked bone, there is no evidence arqueologica that was used on the face.-priests have pheasant (fasianus colchicus) feathers in the plume. The pheasant is a species of China and it was imported much later to Mexico around the 17TH century-the Mayan civilization is to date, an agricultural society. The existence of a jacket community without milpas is simply unrealistic.Do these are some of the things that are wrong in the movie and the debate is opened because it is lawful to undertake these historical irregularities? A movie is the vision of a creator, therefore, can change things to suit? Who knows andeNo me what I could believe, but there is, in one of the frames of the movie the guy has crept to the character of the popular books where's Wally? That if the cachondeo father.If we start with these stories, already I I'm imagining as will be the movies Morrow, all full of subpeliculas in the own movies. Messages, jets and a thousand things more into hidden frames. Times change, and the film more.One last appreciation more: massacres in the sacrifices. I rescued a comment poured into the putalocura Forum: "the movie portrayed the Mayans almost as genocidal, sacrificing and throwing the remains to tutiplen." The truth is that this level of only sacrificial genocide reached it the Aztecs in their "flower wars", when the Empire needed to constantly new victims to satisfy their gods. "The Maya sacrificed people, it is true, but not those industrial levels."There are many theories about the extinction of the Mayans. Disappeared from the Earth or they were annihilated by the Aztecs before? No one knows, what is known is that ate human flesh, in fact, almost any ancient civilization is saved from having eaten human flesh.And the sacrifices, if, is made. It was the way they had for power between the hierarchs, unfortunately at the expense of human lives.Talk about this me tiraria days, I think it is best to see the movie without more, have fun and not give too much importance to all these historical errors.PS.If Mel Gibson in his movie invents things, I also would like to do in my articles, so I said that in this movie they speak euskera haha.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3195

Adrian Bravo

The Fall

muchocine

It reflects here on the creation of a fiction and its effect in reality, about the power of imagination and innocence as the best of medicines. Fair winner in Sitges 2007.

If the cell, película-promoción - video clip of Jennifer Lopez (that great actress) the good of Tarsem Singh stuck bump, its new and colorful The Fall not followed the steps and succeeds in stopping at the end of the cliff to observe in his Majesty and contemplate the remains of his previous film with derision, and in addition, win the award for best film at the Sitges Festival Fantàstic section 2007.Es certain that The fall is somewhat pompous and over-elaborate, but Singh this time has bundled the backpack and be self-financed the joke to give luster to a bittersweet story, booting a performance to the two main characters that win you the megalomaniac aspirations of the director. Fundamentally, the film features two bullets of gold into the Chamber, and other silver completing the charger. Namely, the gold are, on the one hand, the exceptional photography and the explosion of textures and colours that give off every one of their planes, starting with the moment initial black-and-white a crisp, frozen in time, and all of the Visual subtleties that lie ahead, following the translation of natural landscapes full of life and almost co-stars, and ending with the dazzling composition of each of the frames, almost carefully sculpted to chisel to the delight of the spectators. The other bullet of gold, the emotional interpretation of Romanian girls Catinca Untaru, who seems to not know that it is being filmed and is delivered in body and soul to the history and forms an anthological interpretive Duet with Lee Pace. Silver are perhaps the fable that is us told, rich in details and profuse in content and the idea of connectivity between cultures that transpires from it. The action takes place in a Los Angeles hospital in the 1920s. In it, an Indian girl recovering from a broken arm meets a depressed and vengeful specialist of film that just having an accident in one of his movies. Then develops between them a special relationship, a Covenant whereby the specialist the girl tells a story to change that morphine from the clinic, this brings to put an end to his life. It is then when we witness the story of six heroes through the children's eyes of Catinca Untaru (an African slave, the own Lee Pace as a kind of warrior of the mask, an anarchist bombs and pyrotechnics specialist, a shaman rastafari with special skills for war, a picturesque Charles Darwin and an Indian Prince), seeking revenge for grievances Mr hatred has caused them. The desperation of the Narrator makes the tale to acquire defeatists dyes, but the girl not shall be expired and will enter into a dialectic battle with Lee Pace to snatch the end of the story and at the same time to save her life. Here reflects on the creation of a fiction and its effect in reality, about the power of imagination and innocence as the best of medicines, of how all deserve us a second chance when they leave us lying in the ditch. Perhaps it sounds like watered-down and pastiche of easy emotions but sometimes it's good to be carried away by the look of a girl and for his kindness, although those attending the press room where announced that the Fall was the winning film of the festival silbaran timidly to see that the award-winning did not meet the classic canons of the fantasy or horror. I thought very good choice. That did not seem so good was to award for best actress was take him Manuela Velasco for his portrayal in Rec. Catinca Untaru with five year old gives thousand turns. And if none of this convinces you, raise you viewing of The fall as a virtual tour of almost half the world (filmed in 23 countries) with images that has happened never filmed nor the best makers of National Geographic, or as an object lesson of which feel Chair in the difficult art of build a storygood or not, but emotional in the best sense of the word. All a finding this The Fall. Let us hope that Tarsem Singh not recruited for his new film to Enrique Iglesias, and is limit to produce video clips. Mr Singh, every thing on your site.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2660

Tony Astonish

Lucky You

muchocine

Not even own allocations pocker have rhythm, emotion or tension. Do so the end result is a? couple of twos? not arriving, not even close, to win this game to the indifference...

In a film that, a priori, is closer to the world of Poker, esparaba receive some kind of feeling. When I noticed that the protagonist was "mesmerized" by letters in his desire to win and play at any price, I thought it might be interesting. But I was discovering that "Lucky You" falls apart like a House of cards when it gradually consumed me boredom.Curtis Hanson I excited in "L.A. confidential" extent to cause forced reading the book which was based (well above, even the film). However, on this occasion it away completely their right direction to leave us a sosa and boring film, without any surprise. To such an extent that any aficionado of the pocker might hate it and switch to bocce.Although in principle, we can attract history facing two expert players of pocker, father and son, who are capable of giving up anything by the fact of winning, at 30 minutes of the film immerses us in a State of lethargy that extends to the final 120 minutes which lasts for the film. And is that neither the father, played by Robert Duval, nor the son (Eric Bana) not even the girl in love with the protagonist (Drew Barrymore) are able to convey something other than boredom. This also help both long and lacking sense dialogs and the boring soundtrack. Not even own allocations pocker have rhythm, emotion or tension. So the end result is a "pair of twos" which do not reach, not even close, win this game to indifference.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1350

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Raices profundas

muchocine

Film emotional, essential, human... It is a western, but it could have been a rural drama of our deepest Spain or a thriller of mafia with a courageous visitor and a sensitive child.

I saw Shane (Shane) twenty years ago. Perhaps more. Her scheduled the solemn and only Spanish TV in hours afternoon and brasero. Equal until it rained. So I learned to see film: to love him. I remember huge evenings with Oliver Twist or Ben-Hur or David Coppefield. None of this is already the épila and youth of today whose heroes are made of metal or manga Japanese, which I hate so much, but I will not here to pontificate on my vices because they are also so very nasty - who am I to say otherwise - as those of cualquiera.uno saw (continues by the same rope) that the programmer programmed (forgive the phonetic loop). My supply of films dependent entirely others lacks a video (vhs, beta, 2000, words already in unknown to these generations living Blue ray and HDD) or not to go to the big screen film wherever he wanted to. These are other times. one sees what he wants, to some extent. You rent or buy or gives it a cable or satellite channel to affordable schedules and repeatedly. Serves all this sentimental tirade to locate Shane in the context I want to: Shane is the film of children or, at least, of mine. I was the blond boy from Alabama farm whose parents, honest and good at not being able to, cannot with the tyranny of a bearded and greasy chieftain who wants to lend them so his cows send more peacefully. I was the boy fascinated by the language of weapons that forged his identity with the epic of the retired and erratic gunman also seeking its identity in the innocent child eyes. Reciprocal play, complicit, beautiful.Then I do not escudriñaba the film: not looking for codes and hidden languages, copyright sign and three feet to the cat in the picture. None of that mattered: what wholesomeness was the story, which should be well spot (one has always been abundantly demanding in that).Didn't I to William Manning in the character of the gunman of Alan Ladd. Yes, the Manning of without forgiveness, on the other hand, still did not exist. The infinite by John Ford seed did not recognize because he had simply not seen the diligence or Centaurs of the desert, but I noticed that that end was, by necessity, an end of much height: there was the boy and his hero, firing, after Wilson (the mercenary hired that poured blood afraid the wayward reluctant settlers to leave) had been crushed by the fastest gun by Shaneto which it would not see never.How beautiful is the cinema. What Nice is Alabama. Eternal human emotional, essential cinema. It is a western, but it could have been a rural drama of our deepest Spain or a thriller of mafia with a courageous visitor and a sensitive child.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1638

Kamala

Brick

muchocine

A good work of Joseph Gordon-Lewitt (but also the rest of the cast). Highly recommended to enjoy and also to remember these classic movies, that never go out of fashion, that have grown and they helped us to love the film.

Yesterday I went to see a movie before, but far from now. And he is appreciated. Except for the duration, which follows the line of what is happening lately (two hours and thanks, that now is the style everything lasts more than two and a half hours.) (Yet to be be grateful) and not as it stressed respect for the viewer and the movies formerly lasted what have to last: hour and a half; as much an hour and forty minutes.The case is that I went to the Madrid premiere of "Brick", the last movie of Ryan Johnson. The penalty, which was not in V.O.S. From here to ask retailers to make a preview in original version! This movie is to see it in its original language, to enjoy it as if we had recovered to Philip Marlowe, Sam Spade, Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler. It has the classic: hard detective, dead girl stuck in trouble, femmes fatales, bad, thugs and black, negrísima, dark, plot to non lacks nothing. Since then, Johnson, author of the script and director, has seen many times "The Maltese Falcon" and "The big sleep". But also "death among the flowers", "One of ours" and some "L.A. Confidential".It is curious as the modernization of the classic is given by the environment, not by gender. It is a pure genre, is film black, but developed in Institute and their plots with drugs. However, the action flows at a very special rate within a research in occurring the tracks, which the detective does not sleep and where the why is summarized in a tirade that you find good little (as in "The big sleep") but gives you equal! Why has always been, in these films, less important than the path of the detective. What we catch is how discovers everything what you want to hide, how his mind is more rapid than that of his dangerous opponents, how everything that makes makes it for something.It is a success that the protagonist is a normal type, a type in jeans and jacket, with glasses, a type that all have known, a type that we have all been. So far the realistic granting of the character. Then becomes in Spade, a loner with a loyal friend, his assistant, looking for the answer to the murder of his ex-girlfriend (quiet, this is counted in the first minute of the movie). A boy who seems fragile, but is the hardest. and the smartest. A good work of Joseph Gordon-Lewitt (but also the rest of the cast). Highly recommended to enjoy and also to remember these classic movies, that never go out of fashion, that have grown and they helped us to love the film. As Ryan Johnson.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2198

Bruji

El último show

muchocine

Sensational staging in this tribute to the world of radio and a mythical program.

Sensational staging in this tribute to the world of radio and a mythical program. The always critical look and, in not few occasions, corrosive Robert Altman's falls on the last show of the Americas, the latest issue of the WLT. The last film of the last rebel. Farewell who knew that he could not convince death. "It was the last show." Everyone knew, but nobody said. People in the Midwest believes that if it ignores the bad news, they disappear. But I'm not from the Midwest. "."From somehow? possibly it - Robert Altman fired of lovers. He did work in the preproduction of a new project that would never be shooting lights. Also, as it could not be otherwise, with this phrase which is extracted from a context tilting frontally against the futile use and no sense of voice-overs. Impossible to resist the temptation to criticize a kind of cinema, of recent years, where any narrative technique, argument and even gender are valid to introduce the happy still small voice. Paradoxically, he employs with meticulous precision, in a timely manner, to put on the lips (in off) of the famous detective of the radio serial, absurd observations about the enigmatic femme fatale of your plot.In fact, a gesture that is not surprising in a nato provocateur. Remember that only he dared to trivialize on the war in Viet Nam when this issue still had not been in fashion; to question the American health system, health; to demystify the legendary Philip Marlowe in Raymond Chandler, in A long goodbye; slap the central axis of the film industry, in the game of Hollywood; break with the romantic aura surrounding players, in California Split; satirize the festivals of country music, in Nashvill; show the shallowness of the celebrations, in A day of wedding; destroy the impenetrablemente magical magnetism of the jazz in Kansas City; capture with cynical and accurate target the American way of life that so often caught his attention... beating pulse the adjective of rebel.Is possible that A Prairie Home Companion (real title of this film and name of a real program that airs from 1974) is the perfect excuse to meet on stage, for the last time, the passions that paid his filmography. The delicious country style songs. Crossed stories that feed its marked vocation towards the casts. Its excellent qualities in the direction of actors. The lengthy planos-secuencia the frenetic activity of the various characters, aiming to achieve them, sometimes, in impassable circuits. The recent dialogues, overlapping to create a false sense of improvised naturalness that has never existed in his film. And the continuous pictorial references, which recreated the scene of "The last supper" in MASH, or the portrait of Madeleine Stowe in lives crusades nude. A constant that, by way of painting Museum, the history of art lovers will find easily in the last Show. Precisely, the fascination and admiration that Altman felt for the painting, made that he decided to direct a biography of Van Gogh, Vincent and Theo, which is defined in the section on "stories rare and minority" in which there are others of his films, including three on a couch, with the collaboration of Glenda Jackson, or Quintetwhich intervened Fernando Rey. Those that only God and he understood. The essence of a manifest film irregularity which was chaired by his desire to monopolize many and varied fields, and his obsessive intention aimed at the destruction of preconceived ideals that emanate from the universe itself which weaves the celluloid.On this occasion, the exquisite musical numbers, offered live, alternate with crazy ads of Garrison Keillor, who advertised the multifunctionality of the duct tape, incredible pizzas Prince, in operatic tone properties, and praises the real sponsors: the powdered milk biscuits ranging in blue box. The truth is that any stupid sounds like glory, if it is sung in English. The culture of the show (only known by Americans) displays its charm. Behind the scenes, in a warm family atmosphere, began to worship the protagonists (all major) that only seem to serve the script dictated by his own thinking. Entrances and exits lawless. Hilarious moments. Mixed talks. Endless levels. This is Robert Altman. The filmmaker of situations, that rather than moralistic or deep, messages that offers his last function. The discoverer of actors such as Robin Williams (Popeye), and Clive Owen (Gosford Park), which returns to surround, as always did, from a cast of extraordinary quality. The possessor of a unique style in unsurpassed, unmistakable and unusual that it should only be admirar.¿Alan Rudolph? Paul Thomas Anderson? Do luis García Berlanga? not. I said: unique and unsurpassed.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/537

Tito Chinchan

La máquina de bailar

muchocine

Loose Spanish comedy film. Santiago Segura and Jose Corbacho not guaranteed laughs, must work more situations. Or is it that you didn't for more history?

Homeland film is a curious way define a type of humor that just like in Spain. That kind of make jokes that no one else would understand, if not us. These are the films of Pajares and Esteso, Segura, Chiquito, etc. They are jokes of latter, Marianico short, Arévalo, etc. Lumpy humor that is known. And usually I love Yes.The film is a group of kids that come together to participate in the national competition of the machine dancing, an arcade machine in which dance steps occur. The reasons are disparate and commanded by should a paralytic "head" recreational which in its time was a great dancer (as well as other things). Also appear there by the owner of the recreational, a few Legionnaires and a few Buddhist Middle East. And little else.The patriotic cinema, a world to know. Look at that I her I wanted to see with good eyes, trying to laugh, but not. The beginning is very well, with a couple of very good jokes that caused me laughter. But as the script is going to stabilize, the jokes lose interest and you do not know very well if you face a parody of American films of improvement in team or it is simply a bad film of this type. Regardless of this, the film has very little. Corbacho make something of grace, especially with your burner, Segura makes very little, and the rest of the cast does not average (the legionaries if). And as there is no nudity, well, nothing.In short, loose Spanish comedy film. Santiago Segura and Jose Corbacho not guaranteed laughs, must work more situations. Or is it that you didn't for more history?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1067

Francisco Bellón

Babel

muchocine

Babel reaches very high levels in what regards to the cinematographic art. It is not only a masterpiece, not only has already become a modern classic, but is it film, truth, film with a capital.

There are some films that create great expectations since before even that will begin shooting, and in most cases to multiply the information, those expectations are declining. However, some movies not only manage to keep those expectations, they get progressively increase. This is the case of Babel, one of the most anticipated of the year by the excellent feelings left in Cannes, by its Director Alejandro González Iñárritu, and its extraordinary cast.Alejandro González Iñárritu is one of the most personal filmmakers that have emerged in recent years, and proof of this is that its passage to Hollywood after Amores Perros not le has been "corrupted", but has made him grow even more. A series of events will join a group of people who live and suffer in various parts of the world: in the mountains of the Atlas, Morocco, Japan, California and Mexico. It is a story which talks through different cultures and different languages, of the inability of current human beings to communicate with their peers, and also of the loneliness and isolation that this brings. We take this opportunity to protest at the decision of IPU Spain double Babel, it is a betrayal of the spirit of the film, even more so when much of it must be subtitled. If before we were talking about the growth of González Iñárritu, is not less of Guillermo Arriaga, Babel with signing one of the best scripts that have been written in the last decades, and which undoubtedly will go down in the history of cinema. Alejandro González Iñárritu directed accurately surgeon this jewel of script, and with his very personal narration, and a sense of impeccable film rhythm, get to do something that is within the reach of very few: a film that oozes truth from all its pores, with nothing artificial or forced. Babel is those tapes that capture the full attention of the Viewer, that leave you stuck to the seat, and when they conclude, missing several minutes so it can react and assimilate what he has seen. They also deserve mention the wonderful music of Gustavo Santaolalla, and the excellent photography Rodrigo Prieto. The interpretations are, as a whole, extraordinary, and even unfair to nominate a few above the others, not to do so also it would. Adriana Barraza, Rinko Kikuchi, Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett are simply grandiose work, making the difficult easy, and contributing significantly to that sense of reality which transmits the set.Babel reaches very high levels in what regards to the cinematographic art. It is not only a masterpiece, not only has already become a modern classic, but is it film, truth, film with a capital. And before this, the only thing we can do is take away the hat, and applaud one of the greatest geniuses of the cinema of the 21st century as Alejandro González Iñárritu, and enjoy with his new creation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1835

Iñaki Bilbao

Darwin Awards (Muertes de risa)

muchocine

Nice movie that unites different genres, being of pure comedy which won the role.

Nice movie that unites different genres, being of pure comedy which won the role. Because everything that happens in the tape is subordinated to the prism of humor under which everything is narrated. There are elements of thriller, Detective film, even phsycho killer, but all told with much humor, sometimes humorous, sometimes with undoubted fine styling apuntos, but always making laugh to the viewer which, however, must enter into the great joke that is being, and all, this work of the for me ignoto Finn Taylor also has said that everything is subordinated to the genre of the romantic comedy, and it is true because, at the end and all, the search for true love, true love, what is permanently in game.The development of the film is uneven, with episodes truly achieved, as the of the sadly defunct Chris Penn, other authentic descojono, Julianna Magulies, and others a bit stupid, but always the smile is achieved an accomplice of the Viewer. No, is not at all a good movie, but it is effective in its humor, quite funny, and that is made without other moods that do have a good time at the spectator. And I think that, above all to the delivered work of its effective performers, is achieved.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2617

José A. Peig

La noche americana

muchocine

The enormous capacity of Truffaut to build characters equipped with a humanity so real and dynamic as life itself and the ins and outs of the art of representation, provides the documentary a metaphorical power constituting the dimension more emotional, romantic, and ultimately, deep of a speech encouraging between the tear and smile.

When life ceases to make sense, the film has the power to prolong the illusion with its expressive potential, as a game of representations as a catharsis. Or perhaps, cinema and life are the same thing, we are interpreters of ourselves in the great theatre of the world. The universe posed by Francois Truffaut is watching us through three eyes: the eye of the viewer and the eye of the camera facing camera which is representing another universe. If we include the Viewer, we have three representational realities synthesized into a whole film that drift in a metalanguage for discussion between any lover of the seventh art.It is obvious that in this film prima the intention and style documentary, and therefore is a movie buff treasure given to many lectures on cinema understood as a product industrial and subjected to trade rules, or as an aesthetic expression, or a divertimento for their perpetrators, as part of their personal fulfilment. In fact, the greatest merit of the film, and it is in this sense where the mere documentary reaches the State of dramatic work that symbolizes the emotional problems and the disappointment of the characters, is its ability to synthesize life depicted with the "real" life, the effort to improve the work of interpretation with the effort to improve human (or better)(one thing leads to another). It is a film about people and characters, which, with a mask or without it, remain what they are, or what we are all. The enormous capacity of Truffaut to build characters equipped with a humanity so real and dynamic as life itself and the ins and outs of the art of representation, provides the documentary a metaphorical power which constitutes the dimension more emotional, romantic, and ultimately, deep of a speech encouraging between the tear and smile, in which performers themselves are called into question their instincts vital with regard to the requirements of the Office of actor or Director.Great film by Truffaut, though perhaps it extends too in some passages that do not end of reach significant port, and instead leaves a little in the air other aspects that they could have gotten more juice. It won the Academy Award for best foreign film in 1973, and is the best movie of the French author according to the opinion of an important sector of the critics.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2726

José A. Peig

Criaturas celestiales

muchocine

Extraordinary storytelling, prosaic and poetic at the same time, where fantasy and reality form a whole depending on which explains why a tragedy without justifications or superfluous moralizing.

When the film is loosely based on real events it is common that the product should take a simplistic and schematic turn which makes that the representation be limited to a narrative that emphasizes the sensibleros or morbid aspects at the expense of the penetration and reflection on a few facts of extraordinary brutality, which would be the highest goal for the creation of artistic aims - or at leastIt should do so - to shed light on the incomprehensible aspects of human behavior. "Heavenly creatures", Peter Jackson gives all a lesson of film and effort in what is undoubtedly his best creation.The torments and the innocence of the adolescent impulse are presented through two women's souls equipped with a characterization between the plausible and idyllic, between tenderness and sinister, in a descriptive account of a relationship and a progressive obsession love between two souls to hatch because of its peculiarities and its desire for freedomwhich collide against the Puritan moral of the New Zealand society of the 1950s. The remarkable pace visual, like a sober and quite devoid of exaggerated tricks expressiveness, result in a narrative that cohesiona fluidity tones and themes with enormous versatility: the mystery of love and sex, generational conflicts, the imagination as a way to sublimate or subjugate the stark reality, the sarcastic with that tone often represents adults with a nude look at adolescence and their vulnerability, the magic of fantasy with the sinister desire to kill to achieve freedom of actions and thoughts. Life as literature and literature as a method to idealize life itself. History heartbreaking about two souls great and hypersensitive to degenerate toward an act criminal and macabre precisely so the magic never, end the fire of eternal friendship and love, or rather, that fantasy and pre-adolescent hope that dreams of a higher life despite the threat of the adult world.Peter Jackson does not yield and ends his story without Manichaeism or pretensions clear of facile of any kind, without using other words of the own image of two souls who suffer from the fear of loss and separation, symbolized with a farewell obliged after committing an act that will condemn them forever. We are surprised when we hear news about children who kill their parents, and tend to simplify using explanations such as evil or insanity. The film, in this case, expresses the contradictory dimension of the human condition, the complexity that arises when the feelings clash against reason and ideologies against the ideas or dreams of immature minds; how the magic and fantasy, and love and friendship (the luminous dimensions of life) can lead us to more sinister corner of existence. We are angels and demons, "Heavenly creatures", so vulnerable, that end up shaping their own hell for wanting to win the sky.Extraordinary storytelling, prosaic and poetic at the same time, where fantasy and reality form a whole depending on which explains why a tragedy without justifications or superfluous moralizing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3003

Tito Chinchan

La maldición de la flor dorada

muchocine

Film about conspiracies in the medieval Japan palaciengas. An absolute delight for the eye of the Viewer, but it falters much in history who wants us to have. Recommended by the visual spectacle, which is the greatest thing.

Many times one dreams of moving to an era of these in the past, where the emperors and kings lived as such. But well thought out, I think that the thing should not be both. To begin with, the Empress can not be peer without having an attentive lacayo there to shout "the Empress is has I, smell the extract of his divine essence". Then all live subyogados a gentleman, so are more slaves than anything else. And the emperor has no grace if you are not a cabronazo, in addition to having to take a sauna seat that should leave you the almorrana after riding the brava that spicy chillies of the Eroski.La film is about the wife of the Emperor (I remember that he was Emperor) that has a little fucking life. Her husband is committed that it has a disease, which gives a few herbs for 10 years to improve. For some time, a new ingredient is doing him turn into something crazy, so it decides that it is time that one of his sons (three only one is yours) take you the relay to the cabronazo, I say to her husband.Well, visually, the film is incredible. In many moments you remember with great tenderness of spirited away, with these colorful amazing scenarios. The costumes and make-up are outstanding, it gives you that thinking that more than one would die or stifled among so much clothes, or boredom in putting the colors, or skewered with a fork of these giants. So the visual level makes us crazy and we put in the history. But here comes the problem, given that the story does not end we get. Not is if it is seems incredible and distant or simply because it is not attractive, but I've not liked. And the final Fireworks, in addition to not know where can come from so many human beings, I thought was ridiculous. That if the fight scenes are very original.In short, film about conspiracies in the medieval Japan palaciengas. An absolute delight for the eye of the Viewer, but it falters much in history who wants us to have. Recommended by the visual spectacle, which is the greatest thing.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3693

Oscar Martínez

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Francis Lawrence terjiversa altogether the Matheson message for the benefit of a hopeful palomitero blockbuster that loses its charm in the middle of footage.

Here is the Christmas blockbuster.Directed by Francis Lawrence, responsible for entertaining Constantine, almost entirely by Will Smith with Alice Braga, Charlie Tahan, Salli Richardson, Paradox Pollack and a cameo of Emma Thompson included, finally reaches our screens of the third film adaptation of I am legend, Richard Matheson novel in 1954.La film puts us in 2012. Robert Neville is the last man alive on the face of the Earth, although he is not alone. The other men, women and children have become vampires, and are all thirsty for the blood of Neville. During the Hunter, looking for the living dead while sleeping, but at night you must hide waiting for dawn.The truth is that a server had a terrible desire to this film, but apparently not have been able to feel more than a remarkable disappointment; not by the product itself, but rather by what I am Legend could have been and is not. But, for better or for worse, this blog has always defended the fact of having read a novel prior to the screening of a film, and we will not make an exception now.Lasting little more than an hour and a half, I am legend is divided into two distinct parts, along which we are witnessing various flashbacks - not very fortunate usually - intended to put in background. The first half, certainly the most interesting, is only and exclusively performed by a solvent Will Smith accompanied by his dog Sam and Francis Lawrence delights us with a succession of spectacular panoramic images of a New York devastated and seriously affected by the undisturbed advance of mother nature: buildings in ruins, abandoned vehicles, dirt everywhere. The Big Apple is now a vetigio of the past, a ghost town inhabited only by Robert Neville, which seeks to maintain the codura through habit and custom, either with a disciplined daily order, with the search for a cure, or desperate interaction with his dog, on radio, or sets with mannequinsasking to beats of silence various moral dilemmas both the protagonist and our own society.Unfortunately, as the plot of I am Legend ceases to delight with its approach to begin to develop, the myth is crumbling steps agitantados: on the one hand we are with the terrible disappointment involving vampires, not by appearances - on the other hand, based on topical effect-coups, but by its own reconstruction digital, quite far from the refinement of the CGI we have seen in several productions throughout this final 2007.Enthey are poorly made.On the other hand, the identity crisis which should lead to the emergence of Anna and his son in the far monotonous life of Neville although Yes we is raised, for the benefit of the persecutions and the shootings of rigour, though not badly shot nor posed no wonder, that without taking into account the various inconsistencies that raise. As if this were little, the outcome I am legend - that I will not reveal - is dotted with a hopeful pseudoreligiosa moralina, beyond being radically opposed to the original intention of Richard Matheson, simply is insultingly dogmatic.Ultimately, a server so just highlight the first half of the film, as Smith should begin to interact, I am legend is lost by palomiteros paths which, despite being (relatively) required throughout blockbuster raised otherwise would have given foot to a completely different film and, probably, quite round.Maybe the dog Sam.Le am a 6 out of 10, even if if I would compare the conba film the original novel, the note descended sharply to a 3'5 or 4.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1452

Matías Cobo

Juegos secretos

muchocine

Deepens, giving in the wound with clinical precision, this indispensable child nature that is common to us and puts us face insecurities, whims or flight to stagger our existence.

In addition to to discover the great interpretive talent of Tom Wilkinson, room helped me to keep track of a director capable of scavenging feelings with the precision of a surgeon. Despite its appearance of TV, that tape, first feature of Todd Field, laid the foundations for his cinematographic virtues as a filmmaker: a model work in the direction of actors and the calm pace of a cinema that unravels, the more detail, the different folds of his characters. In secret games (inappropriate translation of the original Little children), the strengths of its predecessor are still intact, and even improved, but also suffers from some of the shortcomings of that. As his preference for certain characters, best outlined against others who tend to be portrayed with brush and throwing of stereotypes. Or the rather hasty use of the tempting resource close stories crossed with a tragic ending.Nevertheless, Little Children is an interesting movie that assumes the difficult challenge of telling, not indoctrinate or include moralina, how live several families of class middle/high in the typical American urbanization. Focused his narrative on the summer Idyll live Brad Adamson (Patrick Wilson) and Sarah Pierce (magnificent Kate Winslet) behind their respective partners: Kathy Adamson (Jennifer Connelly) and Richard Pierce (Gregg Edelman). Without justifying with romantic hampered corny or censor the adulterous relationship, it is raised as the result of a child boredom or a naive search for happiness born of this constant dissatisfaction with common life between our societies.The voiceover of the story, from the character of Winslet, describes his tired towards her husband or her daughter, who described as capricious and selfish without realizing the status of girl child from that. Thus, when in her life erupts a unexpected breath of fresh air after his relationship with Brad, believes feel steeped in a pure and crystalline, happiness in the Antipodes of his grey and routine life. And Brad thinks of something. He is not unhappy in his role as master of House or as a primary responsibility for the upbringing of her son, but he isn't happy in his continuing to discuss these domestic obligations and family pressure to approve the review that he remains until graduating in law. Feel as stripped of their teenage years have assumed responsibilities from an early age.Another character, whose history is to baste the set is pedophile Ronald James McGorvey (Jackie Earle Haley magnificent despite being badly bent). Although he is aware of their pathological attraction to children, you cannot overcome its condition of patient or with the support of his mother, the only person that feels loved. And even less in a neighborhood where is monitored and pursued until exhaustion by parents frightened by the threats to his sons Ronald (excellent scene of the pool, with included nod to runs to the Spielberg shark generated among bathers). The story of Ronald comes paired with the of the retired police Larry Hedges (Noah Emmerich), a man with a marriage failed, lost after his expulsion from the police force by a serious mistake that made still in service, and other characters from the film, needy of affection and recognition of a big kid who feels marginalised.In the end, Little children overlaps with some of the pointed hits points more loose as an irregular rhythm by time and use abusive, almost adjacent to the self-explanatory note, of the voiceover. But yes deepens, giving the nail with clinical precision, this indispensable child nature on us is common and puts us face insecurities, whims or flight that stagger our existence, but also of those who are considered by strings, sensible and weighted people. So that, on more than one occasion, let us and we behave as a few big kids than adults that we aparentamos be.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3659

Kiko de España

Thriller: A Cruel Picture

muchocine

It is the last third where we can see up to where he became the influence of this unknown movie, being part of the universe and the more obvious Matrix Kill Bill.

Hold the males because we are dealing with a banned film. I wanted to see Thriller: A cruel picture for several reasons. That if Tarantino was inspired by her for his Kill Bill, that if do not know how many years hidden in a drawer. the case is that the movie doesn't disappoint, but on the contrary: while other 70's movie revenge of in the line of I spit on your grave there is to point a number of rough details to raise to Olympus to this Swedish movie rather than any American cafrada (although always fun) as the "porn touch" or the model scriptsomething that lacked the rest of revenganzas.Thriller is the story of Madeleine, a girl who was fifteen years ago a girl was raped by a tramp viejuno causing a perpetual trauma and the definitive loss of speech.One day fails in good time to the bus and a crappy guy, picked up by a Swedish Malcolm McDowell at the time. And he kidnaps. And it makes addicted to heroin. And it prostituted.We then started to freak out. When the girl is with one of their clients forced the planes leave no imagination: finest first and plans detail of "action" make the movie an instant classic of the porn semi trash.Madeleine be pirar, clear, and while he is lying with the crappy clients will saving for weapons, fighting, shooting and driving classes.Revenge will be slow, but it will be the rehostia.It is the last third where we can see up to where he became the influence of this unknown movie, being part of the universe and the more obvious Matrix Kill Bill. What matters now is to avenge the fuck up and go if there is revenge in the final part, we now have the Peckinpah part of the movie: superslowmotion for each and every one of the shots of the pirate. pure delirium.A final act of street justice so brutal that one cannot help but remember until it came time, probably the best revenge of history. If you haven't seen this "suecada" you are taking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/781

Caruco

The Queen

muchocine

It will serve to revive the debate on the need of the monarchy, and the personalities of Elizabeth II and Lady Di.

Stephen Frears, once fierce chronicler of wild capitalism that fostered the first Minister Margareth Thatcher during the 1980s in England, with titles such as "My beautiful laundrette" or "Samy and Rose make it up", returns with this telefilm of luxury that is "The Queen".A chronicle of the Black week, the six days that made wobble to the British royalty, which broke with the death of the popular Princess Diana, on August 31, 1997. And Stephen Frears, as Prime Minister Tony Blair (Michael Sheen), labour, submitted in the first instance as reformer and modernizer of the English Government, almost just converiéndose the fan number, not Lady Di, but also of this superior, elegant and stately Queen Elizabeth II, who plays so well Helen Mirren. discretion and dignity.However, more than an admirer of the monarchical, and despite showing with sympathy, and somehow endearing creatures that made up as Prince Charles (Alex Jennings), Prince Philip, the Queen's husband (James Cromwell) or the Queen Mother (Sylvia Syms), Stephen Frears seems to enjoy nice in this recreation of a historical fact that put in check, before his own people, to the royalty.With an Elizabeth II educated in forms already deciduous and away completely from the feeling and the ways of thinking of its people. That you want to act with "discretion and dignity, without publicly express or mourning at the death was his daughter-in-law, and without disguise, in privacy and with"discretion", the hatred that had for him. "But that won't have little choice but to requests from citizens, the pressures of the media and the advice of the Prime Minister Tony Blair, to show his, no sense, mourning the death of Diana in public."This fool Blair! "And in addition, your tea will has enfríado", he exclaims her husband back to reality, with all the kindred, a refugee in the summer residence of Balmoral, dedicating himself to hunting and take tea. Example of one of the pillars of an ancient almost ancient institution, or a symbol still necessary to the capacity of a nation, according as you look at it.Duel's popularity.At the funeral of the mourned Di Lady being called two million people and, on the first line, names such as Elton John, Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg, Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. And the ceremony was followed, in a spontaneous reaction by millions and millions of viewers around the world. A convening power and popularity, unimaginable to the Royal family.Before what is approaching, even the Queen come to identify with an elegant stag with a Horn of 14 antlers as majestic as unique in its kind, perhaps destined to extingirse soon. While the members of the new reformed Labor Party to power the calls "gorrones" that cost millions of pounds taxpayers.Priceless scenes with Cherie Blair, the wife of the Prime Minister, scathing and radical antimonárquica (Helen McCrory), for example, during the visit to the Queen, with poses of reverence and respect looks so forced and ironic, as patosas, while Queen Elizabeth II provides with some contempt but yes, keeping the "dignity".Moreover, the realization of Stephen Frears is absolutely flat, relying on the script and the good work of its actors. "The Queen" will serve to revive the debate on the need of the monarchy, and the personalities of Elizabeth II, Queen "dignified and discreet" in their stale hierarchy; and Lady Di, the "Princess of the people" with hook for a world in need of idols.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2235

Silvia Giner

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

For me this is probably the best movie of the 3. The first found me appalling. The second I liked and that I loved.

For me this is probably the best movie of the 3. The first found me appalling. The second I liked and that I loved. What did Johnny Deep with Captain Jack seems impressive. The character that I am sure that the same producers expected has given a charisma. And it is terribly sexy a man so sexy that is not intended to be so. That's what we like about the Jack.Aun Captain recognizing that it is a product of mass I must admit the acumen of this 3rd part, although we intuíamos what was going to happen, when it happens we were equally excited (the magic of the film).Of course not all are joys to the pirates because I have several buts, that "it is too long," for my spare you 10 minutes of the match in the whirlpool and about 6 in the final battle. And namely what amounts the deleted scenes footage (as we will see when the DVD draw). Another but is that Keira has me tired with your pout, I mean let's see, okay get morros occasionally but it is that this girl is incapable of playing any role without taking morros, seems it not enough to miss the collagen that began to put before filming Pirates of the I Caribbean but must above us bore with an excess of labial meat which chorizo cantinpalo. There are also other stuff. Let's go shit director of clothing that allows the dancers that leads Keira are perfect throughout the film, doesn't matter if it gets wet or goes pro on top of the mud, are always good.We leave behind the minimaladas suppose that for any critical eye does not go unnoticed and let's really interesting. Orlando Bloom. I don't know if I like more pirate or Elf, as not I decide I thought could do a mix, Elf Monday, pirate Tuesday, Wednesday Elf, pirate Thursday, Friday. I know that he hates being a sexsymbol but it is. Well the artistic progression of Orly is clear to everyone that has memory and eyes on the face. Indeed his character in the saga suffers a progressive transformation that is really carried, to the point of finishing well being the absolute protagonist.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2513

Bruji

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

In the realm of the PlayStation, the adventures of Harry oblige dust off the imagination, encourage reading and enact fundamental principles such as love and friendship.

In the Kingdom of the PlayStation, it was multiple technologies, universe in which the subject of human being; continues pending the adventures of Harry oblige dust off the imagination, encourage reading and enact fundamental principles such as love and friendship. With debutant director and new screenwriter, the magical saga brings us closer to a fifth installment, almost perfect.Even for those who possess the "emotional capacity of a brick", resist the Potter-mania is highly difficult. Stairs that molt to pleasure, Hogwarts and its millennial emblem "Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus" (never do tickling a dragon that sleeps), "Alohomora", mirrors that show what you want to see, flights in broom, "Wingardium Levi-ou-sa", night breaks to forbidden forest with layers of invisibility, thinkers, trasladores, "Petríficus Totalus!", Centaurs and unicorns, paintings with its own life, platform 9 and ¾, talking newspapers, Siriux the Godfather, "Specto Patronum!", changing labyrinths, black lakes, the room of the necessities or the Nimbus 2000, are some of these things that make reborn fantasy that, at some point, we lost."!!!" The boom in the British writer, however, seems to have fallen into an inexhaustible well of imagination. Film adaptations, for its part, emerge as much magic as the pages of his novels, while reaching one major achievement, which is none other than an accurate incitement to reading. Obviously, no one can expect to the Warner rolls the final outcome. The response if J.K. Rowling will be able to get rid of the protagonist that her has catapulted to fame, as he did his compatriot Agatha Christie with some famous Belgian detective, only found in a book. The Muggels, meanwhile, wonder at what exact point a perfect story develops.The secret of success would have to be found in the comprehensive construction of a parallel world, interrelated with which we all know (only must know that the Ministry of magic is situated just below the English Ministry of defence), in which, far from insulting the intelligence child (common practice in film and literature), decided to develop it. In some characters, based on imperfection and involuntary heroism, inhabiting both scenarios, for which magic does not constitute a way of escape from reality, but a quality of their own personalities with which they have to learn to live. In the issuance of precious messages, start with that derived from the love of a mother, the only one capable of overcoming the evils of mankind (also "to that not must be named"), and culminating with the assessment that "all have light and darkness in our interior, depending on us the choice on the side that we want to promote", to say that "those who want us to""always remain". And in the constant evolution of the saga, which adapts to the different ages of their protagonists. In this sense, and in a progressive manner, Iran disappearing adventures focused on the acquisition of school supplies in wonderful shops, uniforms which both remind us students of Goodbye Mr. Chips, the recreation of the typical dining room which, similarly, Sam Wood shot in 1939, innocent contests in which the fellowship and friendship, advantages richly options the famous phrase of the director wise: "In the light of recent events.", in a magical chess game, or skirmishes against Lord Voldemort (oops, I wrote, without wanting to, his name!) extremely weakened; to make way for other situations requiring maturity.The order of the Phoenix, so surprising as the previous installments, represents the culmination of four courses of sorcery, the moment in which the obligation to study becomes a necessity; or what is the same, the point at which starts to grow. Our Harry has to multiply to adversity, because it is not the famous magician that everyone admire, but the "Plotter", the liar conspirator, ignored by his mentor, victim of a slander him over. Imposes the self-esteem, commitment (training in Dumbledore's Army) and the uprising against the dictatorial methods of Hogwarts. A few stages that form part of the endless School of learning which is life itself.With such fertile conception, followed by a sound development, it matters little who is after the cameras. Either the Alfonso Cuarón himself or a television Director, the success is assured provided that the spectacular production design has the special effects in the service of the argument, and never vice versa; as well he has been so far. Even misses the original soundtrack of Williams, nor the photograph of the first films, in a few stories that, primarily, dominates the screenplay, overseen by its creator. A skull "previlegiado", which I would say Valle Inclán, who, however, you forgot indicate something fundamental. In holidays. How are these people contributing?, by ordinary mail?, with OWL?, by email?.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/143

Daniel Galindo

Tirante el blanco

muchocine

The plot weakens at all times and seems to move by way of vaudeville cheap and devoid of emotion

Little has served its Director have caressed this project for nearly 4 decades and having a budget of 15 million euros for its realization. Saving Alatriste, this one of the most expensive productions in the history of the Spanish cinema, and since they mentioned the title of Agustín Díaz Yanes, seems that we will have to wait for its premiere to see a proper film set in the past with characters of weight. After 24 films, Tirant Lo Blanc again an adaptation, this time of a classic romance published in Valencia in 1490 by Joanot Martorell. Vicente Aranda finds it ironic and sensual, something that has tried to move through images and a screenplay poor that it focuses in the raids of the Court and in the virginity of a Princess as insurance of life of a people and their rulers. Exceptions as Juana la loca, from lovers, filmed in 1991, Catalan seems not right in his dramas, which are always lame (the case of Carmen), are unnecessarily stretched (Turkish passion) or end up solving with late accelerated after a coherent development (libertarian).Aranda covers only part of the novel, in which there are ingredients of adventure, mystery and policy, and is not to emphasise the strong erotic charge of its pages? not talking sensuality precisely - but that surrounding it revolves around the plot of the movie. Sad IE it before a filmmaker as smart, but not surprising with its new proposal: sex openly and without encouragement seem shy, little contextualized, a stance that is offset with a modern, curious language even, and the funny portrait of the mandate of the intriguing women in maintaining the health of the Empire, contrary to the established male order.The ladies of the Court are those who make policy and these actresses, which try to Eaglets a plot that weakens at all times, resembling circular vaudeville as a cheap and devoid of emotion. Much more Leonor Watling and Ingrid Rubio (two sides of the same coin) to Victoria Abril and newcomer Esther Nubiola? of it explains, the April - fail the attention by professional merits. This point is aggravated by the misguided male cast, headed by an expressionless Caspar Zafer and Rafael Amargo. The first as the Knight that comes to Constantinople to fight against the invaders and the second giving life to the Grand Turk. They blamed the result to the problems of production and it is true that things were not arranged as initially promised the veteran filmmaker: change Sicily by Istanbul at the last minute is just one example of the sweat that has because of cost. But we must judge by what we see on the screen and the result, however much that hurts us to be one of the greats of European cinema, is not much.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3153

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Asalto a la comisaría del distrito 13

muchocine

Masterpiece, of worship, sublime recreation of the dramatic tension of extreme characters.

In a time where are privileged the rewriting of the classic patterns and is censored or limits any novel onslaught and, risky, therefore it is easy to develop film, such as cash register, advances, progresses satisfactorily, but the cinema as art, not. There are writers that boast having grasped the spirit or the essence or the pattern of other authors to call (sincerely) teachers and are installed in this placid and accommodative gallery where the excesses and the adventure did not encourage his artistic pulse. In this regard, assault on the precinct 13, the capital work by the great John Carpenter, is Howard Hawks, Rio Grande and we see in the final climax to John Wayne, Walter Brennan and Dean Martin zafar as you can of the horde of gunmen trying to impose his sense of things with the primary language of the western (violence).Carpenter reformulates the landscape, dramatic pulse accelerates and where Hawks, the master, saw the grandiose and monumentalizado landscape of the western, he understands a desiccated and Nicotinic props, the Commissioner besieged by other hordes, but they adapted to the times and turned into thugs criminals. Also moves away from the writing of the original when it holds the terror in an intimate space and feeds its crescendo with the existential anguish (well-reasoned during all the footage) of characters always on the verge of death. The review apora hue that western omitted: some fantastic or supernatural element, the possibility (opened by the George a. Romero zombie universe) that the escalation of violence evident Street comes from the disquieting certainty that the world is falling apart, guilty of any recognizable apocalyptic disease. Carpenter, already master, filmed his siege with sobriety, without delaying in these notes, becoming plausible, enjoyable and exciting up the short argument, its rather than discrete narrative premise, the assault itself. The subject, the fantastic contours of the author-crazy is resumed in ghosts of Mars.(The film acquired a justified nombradía by the scene in which a girl dies of a shot as he nears a caminón distributor of ice cream: brutal)Jean-François Richet in 2005 recorded a very decent remake of John Carpenter's work, with identical title, which does not depend on, but who pays admired tribute.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4151

Oscar Martínez

Juno

muchocine

Juno interspersed acid humor with moralina shift through what we might define as a 'everyday tragedy', in an efficient but non-explosive recipe whose main appeal lies in (some of) their characters.

Directed by Canadian Jason Reitman and starring Ellen Page, Michael Cera, Allison Janney, JK Simmons, Olivia Thirlby, Rainn Wilson, Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner, Juno was nominated for three Golden Globes and opts to nothing more and nothing less than four Oscars, best film, best actress, Best Director and best script Original.La movie, second in the Filmography of the Canadian, relates to mode of comedy indie history of the young Juno, of sixteen, who becomes pregnant after their first sexual relationship and decides to give up his son in fostering a couple who has spent five years trying to have a child.Some years ago, the electronic Academy Awards left aside their prejudices for small productions and began to nominate the quehoy day we all know as indie films, so titles of low budget (compared to the rest of its competitors) and forget about me! or little Miss Sunshine gave the pitch in recent ceremonies, winning the Oscar for best script Original.Por, unfortunately, when a novelty becomes habit, the original spirit is terjiversa and denigrates in an election almost by default. And it is not that Juno is a bad movie, au contraire, but their four nominations were you seem to a server something excessive, most still bearing in mind the scant originality of the product. As well as believe that forget me!, American Splendor, Ghost world or the previous film from Jason Reitman, thank you for smoking, are more than notable products, I think that little Miss Sunshine is one of the films more overvalued for years, and the truth is that Juno uses exactly the same formula that the film directed by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Harris. still with the echo in our minds of embarrassing messJuno is served from an unwanted teenage pregnancy to make the portrait of coming enough characters as so the Viewer is identified, or at least feel some affinity towards any of them, and win this its blessing. With an Ellen Page which stands as absolute epicenter of the film, Juno interspersed acid humor with moralina shift through what we might define as a daily tragedy, in an efficient but non-explosive recipe whose main attraction is, precisely, some of his characters.Thus, Ellen Page, to its twenty years old, takes almost the entire weight of the film, portraying a responsive and always sarcastic teenager that nonetheless remind me an affable version of Ghost World Edit but that, instead, it does not suffer any evolution, it addition to discover true love. And it is that Juno has always something to respond, always has an ironic phrase, a hurtful, precise comment, cool and calculated mathematically by his screenwriter which makes it pretty incredible. do sympathetic, endearing? By alleged, but not credible.In the same way, the young Michael Cera is a completely irrelevant and bland character with the exception of the final stretch, similar to j. k. Simmons, just a cranky Jennifer Gardner and Alison Janney, incredibly condescending parents, and an absolutely brilliant Jason Bateman avoid that Juno is a monologue of nominated for Oscar. so young and all, I insist that Juno is not a bad film, and is worth the trouble to see her, but is not the eighth wonder of the world that many seek to see it. And is that the label indie happened because some time ago to be a sort of patent, and from there, anything goes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3870

Emilio Calvo de Mora

American Gangster

muchocine

It could have been so much and so much expected from it that at the end left only a very well resolved thriller police life, mobsters with moral led and policemen with sound moral principles to proof of corruption.

The American dream, his epic wrapped in the bars and stars, has sought to a genus, a sort of clear speech according to the material so greased of patriotic ideals, narrative of which part, as slave of the moral integrity and safeguarding of moral principles suspiciously inoculated in the cultural heritage of a people which has blood ties and sociological complicity with virtually all corners of the globe. These coated religion, moral principles sausages in the imposing nationalist propaganda triumphal March, also have their share of spectacle, of ironic Lair by a vistosidad often at odds with the real essence of the values political and spiritual that seem to guide their way of life, their semiotics of hamburger and ragtime, blues at the crossroads of roads and gospel beautiful in the floor of a church. The monstrous reality of the United States as a country, as bizarre melting pot of peoples, cultures and ways of understanding life can not escape the greedy eye of Hollywood. It has never been well since the birth of a nation of Griffith mancomunara in a same jar the essences of the mere circus show and political doctrines. This reagent stoked the national spirit, formed an ideology consensual, not written, maintained by a few emotional ties: the land as a gift, the Earth as inherent heritage man argument sold by Steinbeck in literature and become images by Ford in the grapes of wrath or the classic western; the sacred marriage of the divine designs and the policy so that the President, almost in the manner of royalty in Europe, works for God and man, as if that all-embracing God had recruited - human and not the polls - to guide the people and lead to the manna of the well-being and global primacy; and, finally, the loyalty to the flag, anthem an apotheosis, as symbols of an Empire does not die at the borders of the map that aims to colonize the world with its magnificent showcase of exportable icons, acceptable and convertible, with that fine way of doing things that have for marketing, own, when it is strange, when it is employed. The film has appreciated these ingredients so that the recipe endures basically with the same composition. Just change a Director by another or a good writer by three mediocre so often that really is worth. At the end there are the result, the message, the tone between the twilight and the spookiness, sublimated reality and colada lies as a caramel dulcìsimo enlivened the evening in the city. Popcorn, Coca Cola and the runrún obscurely of having already seen the same story hundreds of times and that feeling uncomfortable, slightly uncomfortable, but already imperceptible that we are selling the donkey and we already have a block with a dozen of similar beasts. No matter: we went through the hoop, believe that entertainment needs of your audience and already for a long time that we have affiliated with the clumsy membership and quiet, manumitida of any civic or moral, responsibility that attends the film to feed the monster of trade and receive, in return, our generous dose of deception, which is the primary way of overcoming the fears that continuously gives life and thus to parade through their frightened passages with the gallantry and packaging - forgiveness, cowboy - torero of our heroes on the big screen or the girl who contingency is the same and in these situations of accused archetypal uncertainty - what I come? To my President? At my God? To Jack Bauer? At Captain America? -know where to throw and what to do to prove manhood. Bad, sometimes, is that models exhibit narrative inconsistencies. Happens that America, the Northern erasing the bland Canada, leaves his sons were encabronen and amanceben with anger, almost denying the mother kind and lyrical. The American dream fades, taunts strict surveillance systems enabled for your enjoyment, reformulates the learned epic and translates to the murky Vertigo of the spontaneous and unstoppable, enrichment to the episode of power as the most beautiful of the lovers, with its erotic and definable territory. Then arises mafioso, the capitalist society of the seven seas pirate descendant, the capo gangster disciple offenders of the souls priest taught the wonders of faith and justice - poetry or non - coup of Psalm and obscurantism. In this peculiar context is possible creation of the archetype of the mafia and its full immersion in social texture, which emanates its force and where it operates its creativity for evil, morality cloudy and the burial of all the tenets of good citizenship, rights human and the usual paraphernalia of peccadilloes and large sins they commit to perpertrar his dream of Caesars in itsy bitsy. Already had titles in 1930s that took care of this image of the mafioso as tiny Emperor in his neighborhood, with their retainers and the Pleiad of blind mercenaries which did not cease to be soldiers of the cause have grew up from childhood. American Gangster arroba unshakeable leadership capacity and consents that his figure, apart from the larceny and extortion, poured blood and fear on the street, ranks the pastor or the Patriarch governed the destinies of a community, ensures she (with iron always hand) and manages his destiny. That neighborhood or city Regency buys politicians and law bodies, respect codes of conduct and disciplined forms of relay in power in a extreme inaúditos that the henchmen escalafonan by personal delegation or bursts of submachine gun. American gangster, unlike other models of more body film as the Godfather in all their examples, Goodfellas or Scarface, the price of power, WINS ways classical, without really achieve them in reliable and very credible environment of the seventies, reflected his political ambiguity, its inventory accurate lyrics - B-sides of singles from the time and funk devastating with thin strands of elegant soul - and its ochrespent then, film before scanning and chromatic perfection we spend today. Scott is a worker in Hollywood rather than an author as well, far and unreachable to apparently Visual incantations of Blade Runner or the forceful first Alien have been recruiting by the more orthodox machinery of the stablishment and as Bumpy Johnson in the opening scene, in which dies and opens the war of clans for powerHe has understood that personal relationships are lost and it has overcome the weight of the multinationals, which any Domesticity and embrace without hesitation to the dollar at the maximum performance with an effort and a minimum responsibility. He, as director, as Manager of a fantasy sold as a real fact, also left handle that already irrevocable premise of the labour market. The film is not a classic, from budgets that reinforce the film is not a great film, and can be: is a more than worthy spectacle of masses, a button of commercial cinema lavishly checked, but devoid of emotion. It has American gangster sufficient narrative inconsistencies (lagoons, whitespace, large holes like Central Park, say) to knock it down with more emphasis, but she is saved by the rigour with which the subject is treated, their unrestrained trade. Only this Office rescues the gangster number one offer for this newly lighted century. Who died left monuments, including a television series (oh yes, the idiot box winning pulse once more to the big screen) with legions of fans (the Sopranos, of course). Frank Lucas, the driver of the gangster that manifests itself in short brushstrokes of images as the guy ready and safe in the world, raises a formidable building of shenanigans and extortion of new laws of market and overwhelming evidence of seriousness and solvency. Yes, all that is fine and perhaps actually had to be so, but Scott and his screenwriter, Steve Zailian, have not careful enough and have thrown the mimbres of what could have been a peliculón overland. And it fails. The record, Washington and Crowe to recreate their roles with undeniable talent. They are comfortable and rise them to the rank of papelazos, but the script, plot, the Assembly of situations enabling the hilazón of an argument that can be followed without effort and which truly something stylish Meridian, strike, stays in very little, given the ganass of Scott for making an enduring product. The real mistake of American gangster is that clairvoyance in apply as a great movie. The product has been suddenly in the mirror of art and liked a lot. Vainly. The outrage that will solve many sub-plots and skillful, but discontinuous, of the enormous amount of characters handling condemns the film to an eternal want and can not that inevitably leads to the spectator, even to the hard-working, to a hint of boredom. And that, in this film, is a crime, because its material is excellent and is unforgivable to spoil so scandalously. They are the characters (Frank Lucas mainly) that defy the rules of consistency. Theirs is the main cause of the concern of this chronicler when assessing what have given you. Gangster is an update on key funky of the moralist of yore, who instructed with Psalms in one hand and atizaba with the stick of oak on the other. Because the control and tranquility are the big words in the life of a gangster in the light of the portrayed here. Not pantagruélicas earnings nor the power, so in the abstract, as cúlmen of a life dedicated to the crime. Everything very mystical too unbalanced to a cloudy sentimentality which we cannot assimilate. I, at least, is deducted from what I write, I didn't. Stating that I tried, but the paradoxes, the plot twists and the always very courageous way of telling things I vetoed one greater enthusiasm. The fact that everything comes from real-life situations not unmounted the impression that everything is caught with pins, good and expensive, that Yes, stylish and functional. The police very desastrado in his family life which, however, triumphs in his craft and is irreproachable in his morals and his honesty, stubborn as a few conjurado to overcome evil and restore the calm and peace to the streets of Harlem, on the one hand, and the mobster cruel until the naúsea, capable of unlock the brains of a type for the simple fact hinder their passage into a mild and insignificant time goal and then fall in love with Miss Puerto Rico, win the affection of his offspring and sit beside the fireplace as a selfless officer who has complied with its eight hours of tired bureaucracy and deserves a moment of evasion and tender domestic love. However, in the lead film scene of Christmas, this órdago mafia and cops, of pure American film of life, perhaps not a lost time. It is not. Get one of the film with the feeling that the film still has opportunities for rewrite and return to illustrate what already kept in memory with other unbeatable with new images. And how many.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3303

Adrian Bravo

Funny Games

muchocine

When violence comes out of the television screen.

Funny Games is a stylus, a knife for close and acute leaf waiting for the chance to nail between your ribs to slowly bleed you viciously. Look back is always welcome to review the work of one of the most committed directors politically and socially from the European scene, Michael Haneke, and thank God, equally committed to crossing the borders of the cinematographic language from a perspective completely as author. The look is, if it fits, doubly wise, because he is about to release a remake of Funny Games in United States (Yes, Michael Haneke versioning himself, we assume / hope that it does to finance transgressors upcoming projects of which we are accustomed) starring the prolific Naomi Watts and Michael Pitt. If cache, the latest film from Haneke, poses an incisive look at the wound that caused the confrontation between the Algerian community in France and own Parisians in the 1960s, conflict that it resulted in the massacre of more than 400 Algerians (many of the remains may still lie at the bottom of the Seine), Funny Games emphasis in stark violence, violence by violence, from a political point of view less, although it can not help bring to light the ghosts that appear in almost all his films (the trivialization of violence, the hibernation of the blame in Western society, the desacralization of the brutality by the media, the class struggle ) Funny Games is the story of a family of upper class that is preparing to spend a quiet holiday in a luxurious coastal village, but their plans are truncated by the appearance of a perverse young couple, as dragos Clockwork Orange (and with a curiously similar aesthetics) get sibilinamente involved in their lives, at home, to inject blood and terror in their heads and play literally with their lives. When they seem to find a way of salvation, the perverse game beyond the screen, becomes global, meta-film, and we realize that there is no any exit. It is the triumph of pessimism, the tragic end, the triumph of the wicked game and the dissolution of the boundaries between reality and fiction. The film even performs a fast rewind to remove any hint of optimism, and executioners converse with the Viewer, forcing him to position of one side or another. Opulent society generates violence and this has no intention of diluting its effect and attacks with its virulence, and also makes it because Yes. Haneke makes us reflect on the inconvenience of numb before the images that show us the pain. Haneke films and this in particular, concerned with the current slasher of contemporary French cinema, and to some degree explains the critical success of a movie so hard and ultraviolence as A l'interieur, which a similar approach, won some prizes in this 2007 Sitges. When you see as a man kills another man through a television screen and not feel almost nothing, not you llaméis a psychologist, Michael Haneke and his Funny Games you will give the diagnosis.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/122

Tito Chinchan

Conejo en la luna

muchocine

The argument is not original, but without special effects hits you to seat

I have gone to deceive, I that expected me a space sex film and is which is a thriller. And it is that not you can rely only on titles. Moreover, the poster makes us see that we are faced with a meat of neighborhood video store shelf title. By the way, the very successful, since title is referred to a precise moment in the film that could well have been overlooked, in my humble opinion.The film is a partner with daughter are tempted by a gordo buy a plot. Between, kill a man that has relationship with the Government, and need a head of Turkish, fuck this couple. Total, who without eat it or drink it is put in a tremendous story about corruption in Mexico and what you can do to conserve power.Division of views within the family, given that my medium kiwi seemed horrible and I am not displeased me. As film of intrigue is good, given that maintains the tension until the end. Moreover, when just not finish very be convecido that that should be the end and you expect to happen even more. The argument is not original, but without special effects hits you to seat, although leaving you a little squashed. On the subject of actors, we have everything. Almost all are very credible, except the main character, which not is if was because I remembered a friend, but did me too making it. The trouble is that it is very sad and sobering.In short, a bad film roll pretty well executed, but to do with morality. After this, I doubt that any family with baby comes to mind to go to Mexico on vacation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1461

Rafa Ferrer

Salvador

muchocine

Salvador is a tape that without a doubt will remove consciences.

Perhaps, I would describe this film like those, not you can "revisit", similar to "Requiem for a dream" this is one of those movies that sense, bad body and the scourge feel your stomach will accompany you during a very long season in your consciousness, go, as my father used is one of those movies that "leaves sediment".To start with this start, plagued some moments that are part of the collective memory of many already, we peinamos gray, or we lose hair, accompanied by the excellent soundtrack of Lluis Llach.Tal time, one of the drawbacks that I put to film is that it is spoken mostly in Catalan, and that even if you drive a little (as it is my case)you finish need subtitles to understand it, that the viewer disturbs him slightly, so as the stupid Mania accompany the scenes of action with loud music.I've hallucinated by the ease with which Daniel Brühl speak both Catalan, Castilian, go that it seems that the boy takes life living in Spain on the other hand, I wanted to highlight the excellent photography, where sometimes the black and white becomes part of the screen and where only emphasizes the blood (red) if it appears in color.Last, and by no means least important, excellent actors, although perhaps highlight Celso Burogallo, without saying a single word in the footage, we see the face and the stomach twists you altogether, giving the credibility and the necessary complexity to the role of the father of the protagonist.In short, a tape that without a doubt will remove consciences.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/427

Kiko de España

Pasado de vueltas

muchocine

The argument is the trilladísima story of self-improvement that much like the Americans. In fact, the movie is americanísima... from the point of view bipolarmente improvised and uncouth.

Last lap, (Tallega nights: The ballad of Ricky Bobby, 2006, Adam Mckay), despite not having any copy in v.o.s., the umpteenth demonstration that here that sends is Mr. Will Ferrell. Forget about Stillers, Wilsons or Carreys. This man is the only one that today manages to make me sweat in a room while I fall tears to contemplate his endless antics create more "last lap". The argument is the trilladísima story of self-improvement that much like the Americans. In fact, the movie is americanísima. from the point of view uncouth ybipolarmente improvised of Ferrell, seconded by a glorious John C.Reilly, who passes it big, and a cast of regular Judd Apatow, Molly Shannon Superstar productions inculida. Huge the nemesis of the prota, the chameleonic Sacha Baron Cohen (Ali G and Borat).Perhaps it takes a little bit to boot, but entry in the field once not for even a second, despite not reaching the glorious limits of the reporter, becoming street the best it comedy this year. I understand that you negueis (fans) to see dubbed, but neither this nor Nacho Libre (do change the title of a movie that has a title in Castilian?) have been premiered in original version, so you have to make an effort, which will last rather little in poster. A 7´75.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3687

Tito Chinchan

187

muchocine

Hard film about a teacher with strong educational ideals that should channel a few students of Institute. Rather it tense, hard and with a very emotional ending, although it is a little heavy. To see one time and no more.

Director: Kevin Reynolds. duration: does not reach the two short hours.Release date: November 17, 1997.Espectadores: 31.468 human beings.There is a film genre that I encadila although, fortunately, does not exist a real number of films of the same, and it is the porfesor who wants to save students descarriados in troubled neighborhoods of U.S.. I am not referring to the kind of "The boys of the choir" (that pretty, and what soundtrack), or even to "The club of dead poets" (oh, my captain, my Captain), if not the type "Rector" (with James Belushi defending their school). The hairs as escarpias and have not yet started or to talk about the movie of the day, which is none other than "One Eight Seven" a code the police which means homicide (not me are super legs and you read cientoocheta and seven as I).The film is about a timorous professor who works in the Institute more hard in the U.S. giving science classes. A small incident with a student that catea takes him to ask for a 15-month low, as well as losing his job. So what, past this period, enters another Institute to make a replacement. At first, the memories crowd you and feels loose, but little by little is achieving that this cluster of present and future criminals learn a little.Let's start by saying that nothing else finish the film caught the sword and I went to liberate Scotland, which take a chalk and go to teach oafs is much less poetic. What finalón more lagrimógeno, as gozé. I have already warned that this genre I like, right? Well, the argument is that more or less know, except that some conflicting students are beginning to have accidents and soars over Trevor Gardfield (the Professor) the shadow that he may be taking justice into their own hands. The role of the teacher assumes it Samuel L Jackson and I believe that does not end it embroidery, not be if movies or what, but you do not get in their flesh. On the other hand if you get do you charge of the situation, so you spend a tense time and at the same time enjoy the history.In short, hard film about a teacher with strong educational ideals that should channel a few students of Institute. Rather it tense, hard and with a very emotional ending, although it is a little heavy. To see one time and no more.Can steal us the chalk, but never will they remove us the pizaaaarraaaaa!Besitos.P.D: The average age of the American institutes is 28 and the minimum height 1.75, Amen have biceps like legs of gorrino, that you may not know.Pd2: The scene move the Phalanx is a total hijoputismo, I loved it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2558

Caty

Memento

muchocine

Do it is gratifying to be able to see a work as a Memento, which amuses, suggests and? hooked?. Does an excellent, and above all, story? he dares? be a film told in a way never seen before.

After harvest a critical success in half the world, the experiment which is "Memento", conquers the public by its originality and boldness, features absent in most of the major studios films, unfortunately, and where many times films are made as if they were in an assembly line, mechanical, without feeling. but "Memento" is a parenthesis in this vortex in the film industry. It is difficult to understand, difficult to understand in a first viewing, but made with so much talent and passion for the seventh art, that it is impossible to not stay hooked to the story, despite the convoluted in its approach.As it is already known to many, the story is told in an inverted manner. That being so, we started by the final scene and we are going backwards in time, until that we discover how started the film. But do not you think that you are going to see dialogues upside down or people walking backwards. The film is divided into several segments, and suffer these segments the temporary investment. The beginning of each segment is the end of the next. At first, it may seem complicated for the Viewer, but after 20 minutes of projection, it is easy to get used to. This investment is not only a resource estililístico of the film, the director and screenwriter Christopher Nolan wanted, with this investment, make the viewer feel as much as possible, through the head of the character of Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce), who suffers from a condition called "loss of recent memory" from the brutal murder of his wife. That condition is the inability to recall more than ten or fifteen minutes straight. Any event that took place before the death of his wife (childhood, work, family, anecdotes, friends) is well remembered, but since the incident, he is unable to record a memory in such a way that it has no exact consciousness when he died his wife, how long has been suffering from this ailment in his mind. because the last thing they remember is the brutal murder. The only way that has Leonard having knowledge of what is happening is taking pictures of everything what he sees, of persons with which has contact (behind these photos, write characteristics of the individual, such as your name or if you must trust him), record everything, do tattoos all over the body with the information more important. So much concern is not in vain. Leonard looking for the killer of his wife and plans to kill him when you are face to face with him. But the murderer could be anyone, and Leonard, due to his illness, runs the risk of being manipulated and deceived. Just knowing Natalie (Carrie Ann Moss) and Teddy (Joe Pantoliano), that, as it is moving (or moving backwards, as you look at it) the plot, good people are changing to pusillanimous beings.Nolan used the temporary investment in a very smart way, because we only discover the "truth" with the protagonist. In a more graphic example, the feeling that is watching the tape is that we are recovering the memory with Leonard. Thus, the sense of suspense is guaranteed until the end (or beginning, according to this approach). The laps of the script are so constant and so well-constructed that frequently the Viewer is rethinking everything. and the end, where the beginning of the story is revealed, is open to as many conjectures and so many possibilities that it is difficult to find two people with the same theory. The script, therefore, is a true watermark, and I can assure you that history would work just as well if the chronological order not vice versa.The activities, which are very marked in this plot, are exceptional. Guy Pearce goes very well and manages to convey all the anguish and stress the role demands. The characters of Joe Pantoliano and Carrie Ann-Moss (which, again repeated film, after the successful Matrix) are also very well exploited, both actors are very careful with their performances, since the true intentions of its characters change several times. The music is very melancholic and accompanies very well the feeling that everything seems new and old at the same time, that all fades, paraphrasing to Rutger Hauer in Blade Runner, "like tears in rain". Also he called me much attention to some particularly important details, are filmed in black and white, as for example the memories of Leonard prior to the murder of his wife.It is gratifying to be able to see a work as a Memento, which amuses, suggests and "hooked". An excellent story, and above all, "osa" be a film told in a way never seen before.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3390

Francisco Bellón

Leones por Corderos

muchocine

After seeing the new Robert Redford film, the first thing that comes to mind is that more than Lions for Lambs is should have titled sheep for sheep.

It is paradoxical and at the same time incredible the ability of human beings to revive some events almost in a cyclic way. And it is also surprising that a society as the United States need a bloody and terrible war to awaken his social conscience and begin a new era. It happened thirty years ago with Viet Nam and is happening today with Iraq. And cinema is not immune from this catharsis, and is beginning to get films that not only denounce the injustice of the war in Iraq but also serious injustices social and political society who live "the American dream". Reaches the charts the new job as director of Robert Redford, which deals with such hot topics as the Iraqi conflict, political corruption, the loss of freedom of the press or the apathy of the society to undertake changes from three different perspectives. In principle, it's an attractive proposal which raises numerous questions, but however to go on the minutes, the opening speech of Redford is will be diluted. The freshness as well as the intention to offer something different is losing, and the script just falling on own American patriotic film topics. Lions for Lambs is an empty movie without any content and that will cause a great disappointment among those spectators eager for an intelligent film that shows the harsh reality that immersed the strongest power in the world. After seeing the new Robert Redford film, the first thing that comes to mind is that more than Lions for Lambs is should have titled sheep for sheep. And the new work from Redford cineasta promises much, raises some interesting questions, but fails to clearly wet. What is more, even gives the impression of exalt certain jingoistic values (that not patriotic) in the country of the bars and stars.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/376

Oscar Cantero

Alatriste

muchocine

A film in which have deposited many hopes and it may mark a turning point in the Spanish film.

After several months of enormous expectation comes the day of the premiere of the most expensive movie in the history of the Spanish cinema. The figures surrounding this production are dizzying and them among the more than twenty million euros of budget, ten thousand extras participated in filming and a quantity record sets. Directed by Agustín Díaz Yanes, who was also in charge of preparing the script from the novels of Perez Reverte, the film is a compendium of the adventures of Captain Alatriste, making a sort of journey through the different books that make up the series.The action starts in the 17TH century in Flanders, where our protagonist fights defending the Spanish Empire. He fights his friend Balboa, severely wounded and whose last wish is that Alatriste take charge of caring for your toddler, and drifts away it from the martial world, so that it never becomes a soldier and run the same fate as him. Diego Alatriste wants to fulfill the wish of his friend, but his life is difficult, as survive based on more or less dirty business, selling his sword. A cast of luxury, headed by Viggo Mortensen, and which also include Juan Echanove in the role of Quevedo, Javier camera as count Duke of Olivares and the enigmatic Ariadna Gil. The rest also are at a good level and those who have been fans of the novels, verify that both the setting and the recreation of the characters are very similar to which one imagine while reading the books. These and other virtues can become a success of a film in which have deposited many hopes and it may mark a turning point in the Spanish film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2570

Alberto Concepción

Transformers

muchocine

Pure and great commercial cinema. It has all the perfect ingredients to become the success that it is.

Shhhh puuum! Graaaskc, ñiuuumm, oisfff. This could be a good summary of Transformers, the last film by Michael Bay, and who raised (and rightly) $ 250 million to date, worldwide. The Bay film is the epitome of palomitero and commercial over not being able to film. But starting from this premise, and only on the basis of it, it is a great movie. Tremendous special effects, sound spectacular (and deafening), funny scenes, good music and young protagonists.Thus, it has all the perfect ingredients to become the success that it is. If we join the realization of a director characterized by spectacular images (Armaggedon, Pearl Harbor), is not simply to sit in the Chair with your popcorn, your drink, and enjoy the explosion of light and sound. Outstanding commercial cinema.However, the film saturates. It overwhelms. As the last 20 minutes of the film, although they sell us it as the final climax and it really, becomes weary. Too much explosion, a lot of sound (become cry). It is as if they decide to show us what you have given us during the rest of the film, but raised to infinity and for a period of time certainly something excessive.Shia Labeouf, in his role of 'boy-who-falls-bien - al - Viewer', Megan Fox as 'attractive-girl-turned-in-heroin' and the other characters are at the height of a film of this kind, and that the film has its funny moments. And the rest? No more. But you can not expect it. Who is a good script or deep in this type of film dialogues? Does not own the film nor the viewer should not either. 'Transformers' one will entertain themselves. And this gets far. And if you can let yourself go at the pace until the end, it will be one of the films most enjoy. Without a doubt.Palomitero cinema in its greatest exponent. It is this. Nothing more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/268

Alvaro Oliva

Scary movie 4

muchocine

Do clearly focused it for all those who enjoy the comedy? absurd?

The fourth installment of this peculiar saga has as main references to the following films: "The war of the worlds", "Saw", "Forest", "Brockeback montain", "Curse" and "Million dollar baby" among others. The challenge was to try to make an argument capable of together disparate films, to create a new one that was not a mere program sketches type cross and Raya or los Morancos, but unfortunately not have succeed, Scary Movie 4 is a succession of fairly weak jokes, among which there are any Pearl. The director of this new release is David Zucker, a veteran in the world of comedy, which is one of the directors of the work of cult "lands as you can" and that more late was in charge of "Hold it as you can" and the previous installment of "Scary Movie" among others. This new release is clearly focused for all those who enjoy the "absurd" comedy, which makes them have a good time without expecting anything more, and "Scary Movie 4" is going to provide, since it apart from a few very spectacular special effects, has several moments that make it worthwhile having spent 75 minutes of our lives to see this movie again starring Anna Faris and it counts on the participation of Leslie NielsenCharlie Sheen, Shaquille O´Neall, Carmen Electra and Chriss Elliott amongst others.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1240

Yojimbo

Burt Munro: un sueño, una leyenda

muchocine

It is a film to smile and to delight us with a character full of life that runs towards his dream.

From time to time there are movies that go unnoticed with both summer blockbuster. Between impossible missions and cansinos codes between mutants and Supermen, there is room for tiny and delicious films at the time was A franco 14 pesetas.This is the case also of Burt Munro: a dream, a legend, a fairly correct but less passionate than his original title translation: The fastest Indian world´s. The film, directed by Roger Donaldson in "indie" plan, as at the time wanted to be him Philip Noyce, becomes a delight nostalgic, autumn, but full of energy with a monster of the interpretation as it is Anthony Hopkins.Como in many products that depend on a total and absolute protagonist, risks fall into gloating and excessive protagonismDespite the redundancy. A not too serious case was the superb Cast away (Castaway), with Tom Hanks colossal but the great excuse of being on a deserted island. Who might do him of antagonist? (:) The dream of Burt Munro is very simple: want to run with his 1920 Indian in Bonnieville, USA, a paradise for all those who want to break speed records. Let us not forget that we are in the 1960s and the protagonist lives in New Zealand. The only thing that is clear to Burt is that you want to run and will take necessary steps to arrive at the race. But what has lighter yet is that it should live their life and their passions. The film becomes a trip fraught with more diverse characters and comedic, emotional and even hilarious situations. So attractive is the trip that the purpose of the film goes into the background and what many feel is a real envy of the vitality that prints to Burt Hopkins through his interpretative power.It is a film to smile and to delight us with a character full of life that runs towards his dream. A great lesson of cheerful cinema without ñoñerías. A great life lesson that we can change the variable of motorcycles by any other that fill our lives.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/886

Elena Suárez

El ilusionista

muchocine

It conveys an aura of romanticism during all times. A good story, well told and entertaining: worth seeing her.

Have you ever seen a live magic show? I can assure you that it changes a lot to when seen on television, in fact, it has nothing to do. When what you see with your own eyes you feel again like a child: excited with the fantasy to believe in magic. And that is what gets the protagonist of our story reaching unsuspected extremes. Based on the eponymous story of the American Steven Millhauser (Pulitzer Prize in 1997 for the work Martin Dressler), the illusionist is situated at the end of the 19th century Vienna, place where politics, love and magic will play a very important role.Edward Norton (that boy's sad face) the role of Eisenheim fits like a glove, but it should not forget interesting work of Rufus Sewell as Prince Leopold.La film conveys an aura of romanticism inherent to the own theme, which is also reflected in the perfect atmosphere aided largely by a few exquisite decorated, not to mention an elaborate costume work during all times. The mounting is very dynamic and adjusted so it will not have the feeling that we need to or too much information (some very welcome in these times). With regard to the necessary use of special effects for some scenes, not having abused them has allowed stabilize two universes without the viewer sits expelled from the argument.In summary, a good story, well told and entertaining: worth seeing her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2852

Dragon negro

Wolf Creek

muchocine

The film is solved quite intelligently and jumping topics in current horror cinema, is in my opinion one of the best horror films so far this year.

They have had to pass two years before the premiere of Wolf Creek to reach our billboards, an Australian horror film that came backed with positive reviews and viewing has proved to be very interesting so far this year.Three young people, two girls and a boy they embark on a journey that will take them through Wolf Creek crater, formed by a meteorite thousands of years ago. What at first was going to be a peaceful journey, eventually becoming the biggest nightmares. Until here everything indicates that this is a more youthful terror tape which Hollywood industry we have come to, and indeed in many criticisms it has come to compare with the recent Hostel and tourists. But nothing further, and is that Wolf Creek happens hand down the face to the two films together and batters them with such ease that one comes to ask if is so difficult to make an horror film worthwhile see and not mediocre by-products that do not contribute anything new.Shot almost to the Dogma style to give more realism to images, the film is much closer to the classic the massacre of Texas than to the above. The director, screenwriter and producer Greg Mclean chooses to move away from the free offal and offer us a vision much more realistic and accurate of what could actually happen if it Skaði us a Homicidal Maniac, in fact the film is loosely based on real events. In addition the film is solved quite intelligently and skipping topics in current horror cinema, which is another success.The film unfolds with calm and unhurried, and may be somewhat slow to who wait a little more action, that there is, but takes its time to present the characters and the situation, although perhaps have too you a slightly long prologue.Wolf Creek is in my opinion one of the best horror films in which carry year, that really has been very weak and should not lose sight to its director from which we can expect great things in the future.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2524

Tito Chinchan

Kun-fu-sion

muchocine

To start the chest to laugh and have to download emergency to what they sew you.

The humor they do in Eastern countries rarely we like in the West. The nearest to us thanks was one program "Yellow humour" which was really fun thank you comments of presenters. By the way, now not be could cast in television, given that they were a little uploaded tone and potentially xenophobic. But other times they were. Who does not remember of the breast chicho, the ay to heat and other retailas of Manakin nipple nipples? To those times.The film is a band of evil called the axes. Of course, they are named because their main weapon is an axe. For reasons which are not the case, they reach a poor area of a large city, where she lives in curious harmony a large neighborhood. In this neighbourhood live an explosive mixture of characters, all dubbed with Spanish accents, making hearing a genuine I messing. Andalusians, Basques, Galicians, etc, are represented by jumping Chinese experts in martial arts. And the entire film is of the band's fight against the neighborhood.Indeed the film is a joke. Impossible is that not you rias, or by to do grace scripts or because you seem so pathetic that you laughing. The characters are the cane. There is a goalkeeper with perpetual curlers who flees to the minimum, given that you don't want to use your hipoeruptohuracanado (such as pepepótamo), a huge screeching. Her husband, a carrot of volume and loin, expert in the most hidden of martial arts and calzonazos grade sumo. Hairdressers gay, also tremendous fighters. And a long etcetera. To highlight the bad very bad, is a Lord who got into the insane asylum because he was not rival who fight. His secret tactic is ridiculísima.In short, that the movie it is worth much. My medium sweet potatoes and I we start box literally. At the beginning we we looked with strangeness, but as soon as you assume the translation, the rest of the tape is shot. That Yes, asumid that the movie is total nonsense, that the Chinese do not fly and that if you tread they head you not up. You are very stupid and you what you all think.To start the chest to laugh and have to download emergency to what they sew you.Besitos.P.D: The asesiones of the Chinese guitar are the Peel.Pd2: Because there is a character that teaches us the ass all day?P.D.3: There are winks to multitude of films, as a Matrix (with the Smith gentlemen with axe) to Asterix (by the absurdez of the blows) and more I do not remember now.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1318

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Terciopelo azul

muchocine

Lynch gives us a superb lesson in how to tell a story. Blue Velvet is Thriller author, shrewd x-ray of the idyllic America, spasm of the soul.

In the films of David Lynch there is always a moral mismatch, a kind of dissonance which, in extreme cases, gift to the viewer trained with a grandiose spectacle of perversion, of twisting, but Lynch never falls on the chabacano, licentious free consent frivolities, feelings of flat nature is never allowed: everything in it tends to the convulsive, everything hence estruondosamente to the anomaly. Therein lies its uniqueness and its unquestioned voice in the film the last nearly thirty years.His journey as a director is a random trip to gloomy of the human soul, a thorough tour by Vice, sin, solitude and anguish: as a Tom Waits, which acodara in the bar of a bar and sing / did the Angers of the body, the spasms of the soul and the darkness of the heart.Nobody as Lynch to transmit sensations, colors and environments: "the world is strange", says a character in blue velvet and us will not head the ear cut into the turf as a premonition of what is going to continue, this parade of characters on the edge of madness or crazy in possession of an exact awareness of his blunder.Provided that Lynch has control over the final process of their work, we should expect much height or products much depth, authentic, visceral, delivered from his Vertigo cinema. That happened with blue velvet.Lynch came to Dune, which was a huge disaster. Dino de Laurentiis, producer, vowed not to return to count on a haunted, as said in press and David sware to not have a man so short sighted, but probably neither of them expressed with this semantic sweetness. Everything was a lie: come to see in this film and the producer decided to assume his mistake in Dune and give the Director carte blanche to make the film wanted. Fortunately. A winding camera travels through the comfort of a comfortable street of family housing. We are in Lumbort, a timber town that seems painted to Lynch him recast with its palette of colors. Everything is security, placid security. The human ear in the grass in the garden, while Bobby Vinton reels the immortal Blue velvet, returns us to the brain of Lynch, his iconography rupture to his pact with the twisted. An old man has what looks like a heart attack: obstruction of its hose is the collapse of his heart in a great concise graphical decision-making.Jeffrey (Kyle MacLachlan) here begins to penetrate into the same hell. He will be the driver of that shared hell that makes her perfect world stable girlfriend (the here great Laura Dern) are tambalee to enter a world rogue of sadomasochism, cabaret and light of brothel embody Dorothy Vallens (Isabella Rossellini) and Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper), singer of club and crazed drug dealer, respectively. Jeffrey is the voyeur expressed surprise that, but unable to look the other way. His eye is ours: surprise, ours. Jeffrey, unwittingly, invests the real investigator: escruta visible to find cercenado, ears in the grass, which should not be, but appears.The sickly tone of color, the risky use of the music, which at all times directed the scale of feelings which are acquired, as the dark plot progresses, all the protagonists. Then Tarantino or Scorsese used with equal talent score, the soundtrack, but here the songs is masterful. What counts blue velvet is the mask of the idyllic America, its failure, the sweetened wrapper and bile flowing like a poison below, although Lynch gives us a superb lesson in how to tell a story (an abduction, say) and assuming, as dupes spectators, that the story could not have been told otherwise. I think that is the magic of a director. And Lynch him (at least here) is to a very great extent.And has one of the best endings I've seen: a sudden return to the place where we start, a denial to the tremendous about what we have seen. As if Tom Waits is lowered to tell us the numen which illuminates it and confessed us, between bourbon and puff of cigar, even though it says that not drinking and that already smokes, all the secrets of his heart wild, rotten and only. Trinan birds and the world keeps turning while we attended a malignant beauty slut session. The world is strange.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/972

Francisco Bellón

Eragon

muchocine

It will be a promotion of the love of good cinema, that suckers that fall into their networks, the next time that they heard about it, will be locked into the nearest library to view the work of geniuses such as Bergman, Fellini and Kurosawa.

Immersed as we are in the maelstrom of the holiday season, cinemas are preparing for a tough battle to decide which movie will be which reigns in this holiday time. Traditionally they were tapes of animation, but that changed five years ago when became two of the most important cinematographic sagas of recent years: the Lord of the rings and Harry Potter. And seen the huge benefits that reported the trilogy based on the works of Tolkien, Fox brings Eragon, a new épico-fantástica story that attempts to continue such good box office data.The film is based on the novel by Christopher Paolini, a teenager when he started writing, he jumped to the fore in the same year released the return of the King. As the great Groucho Marx, what a coincidence that would say coincidentally occur so many coincidences, because the work of Paolini (still unfinished, because that lack the third volume of the trilogy) is first cousin of the great work of Tolkien. The story takes us to Paolini, a fantastic land where governs the cruel King Galbatorix (John Malkovich). The few who oppose him are his hope in Eragon (Edward Speleers), a young farmer who is chosen to be a new Dragon Rider, the only person who could challenge the cruel King. With similar mimbres one would expect an exciting epic tape, but the reality is disappointing. Say that Eragon has all the teen, even children, is staying short and insulting the intelligence of children. That the film is destined for children is evident, even though producers, in a spectacular Pirouette, have worked hard to sell it as a fast-paced story of fantasy and adventure. The argument of an insulting simplicity bored so small as to older, and will cause more than one strategic retreat in the middle of the projection. Stefan December, former technical of the Industrial Light and Magic, before such monumental hassle opts for the simplest way, and instead of looking for innovation in the Visual aspects, is limited to copy (many levels are identical) the work of Peter Jackson the Lord of the rings. If the torment outside little, unknown Edward Speleers contributes enthusiastic and remarkably to prolong the agony of the spectators with his unbearable performance. Jeremy Irons, John Malkovich and Robert Carlyle best nor spoke.It must be admitted that Eragon will be a promotion of the love of good cinema, that suckers that fall into their networks, the next time that they heard about it, will be locked into the nearest library to view the work of geniuses such as Bergman, Fellini and Kurosawa.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1535

Rafa Ferrer

Plan de Vuelo (Desaparecida)

muchocine

It entertains, get that time and peak (always I am complaining long which made many films and this peca short) passes almost flying and, although it is not round, certainly manages to entertain.

Well, once seen only I can say that it is a very good idea, but very badly exploited, second attempt of the same roll (the first was the jar of Juliane Moore daycares in "Mysterious obsession") and yet after pulling much of the movie throwing meat in the grill let us pretty bad, and tell us the reason for the death of the husband of Jodie, nor claims and/or motivations of the bad guys, or know that it happens before, not after what we saw on screen, and is trying to shorten (just 1: 30 min. projection) a film that if had stretched a tad more, would have given quietly for two hours.Brilliant Jodie, as always, also Sean Bean (although everytime I see think instinctively of Boromir), very well Peter Sarsgaard, giving to its role as the depth that, at times, needs a soundtrack that provides just enough in the film (James Horner excellent in the composition of the musical score), and a few levels very strange on a set created especially for the occasion, the aircraft "lie" most perfect in the world.It entertains, get that time and peak (always I am complaining long which made many films and this peca short) passes almost flying (hehe) and, although it is not round, certainly manages to entertain, the penalty is that if we tried to deepen a bit, we we stay only scratching the top without reaching the bottom in fins.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2541

Francisco Bellón

Next

muchocine

Who had the gift of seeing the future as Nicolas Cage's character. With such capacity, us we could save many disgraces which we support in a movie theater.

The day in which an Executive came up that could be used the expression "do inspired in?" rather than "do based in?" was a great day for Hollywood. An ideal subterfuge with which cover the backs to the public by the myriad of outrages carried out with novels, works of theatre or even actual and historical facts.Science fiction has been one of the main victims, as there are countless cases in which a good idea becomes a vulgar action film. E-+ ste is the case of Next, freely inspired by a free Philip k. Dick story titled The Golden Man. It is a Wizard of third in Las Vegas, which puts their physical Nicolas Cage and little else, has the gift of seeing their future with two minutes in advance. Such quality makes that an FBI agent, played by Julianne Moore, ask you for help to avert nuclear catastrophe. But oh, the poor Devil just wants to live a happy and quiet life with a woman, that the vase of Jessica Biel puts its curves, with whom he is obsessed. Who wait to see a work of science fiction that addresses critical and philosophical topics already can go to forgetting Next. On the other hand, those who are looking for a film in which the argument is a mere excuse to give way to an endless sequence of action and Visual effects will enjoy nice with Next. The script there is no grab it even if it goes with the best predisposition, and if were not enough the tape where is extremely cheat. And if not, eye to patch this way, which will leave with their mouths open to more than one Viewer, and these, in a vain attempt to seek an explanation fairly reasonable, brought the screen without leaving their astonishment.Who had the gift of seeing the future as Nicolas Cage's character. With such capacity, many disgraces which we support in a movie theater or on the couch in our House we could save us.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1141

Caruco

Rocky Balboa

muchocine

Do do do do the? Italian Colt VI?, stands in one of the products most? trash? of the Billboard. Pure Z series that can raise their sympathies.

Drooping eyes, sad, crooked mouth and aspect, despite the years and blows, yet strong and good-natured. Stallone returns to unearth the trunk of memories to the most famous boxer of film fiction. And rather than dedicate a mausoleum, his character is still alive and eager to fight, so dedicated a monument, if same, facts and beloved people of the past. Fans of the saga "Rocky" is it will pass well.In his retirement, double the world heavyweight champion already not dedicated to distribute smacks in the ring, but yes to divide tips among friends, acquaintances and everyone who is cruze good in their way, although not come and beside the point. Also to tell their war stories of the past again and again to unknown fans or customers of his restaurant, if purposely coming because it is included in the menu of your "do Adrian? s".And has its charms a film during most of its footage is filmed in a realistic and street way go destelleando veneer of all the fantastic up to move into the mainstream in the most incredible ground during its final stretch. When the legendary Rocky Balboa, of nearly 60 years, enfunde the trousers and gloves again to endure not only the type in the quadrilateral sinó also to give cane to a more young and undefeated rival, a machine to distribute vain leñazos and unpopular called Mason "The Line, Dixon, portrayed by Antonio Tarver (real and current Middleweight Champion)", and had not yet given with the toebox of the shoe.Never feel that it has been completed.For Rocky, combat will help to leave behind vacuum by not able to return to demonstrate what one really was and is, and a son tontorrón and acomplejado by the long shadow of his father.Rocky never throws the towel. Do its formal daring reaches dip of the black and white,? close-ups? and? zooms? fast; broken images, vintage style or making television, emulating a broadcast on television. Do do do do for that, and for the whole, "Rocky Balboa", the? Italian Colt VI?, stands in one of the products most? trash? of the Billboard. Pure Z series that can raise their sympathies and which, in its decadent vision of the show, even comes as ring to the finger take to Las vegas as the setting for the final confrontation.The steps of the Philadelphia Museum of art, immortalized in the first Rocky, are the subject of a special tribute; and also famous music Bill Conti, and the "Gonna fly now", become more slow and melancholic, to explode in its euphoria before the arrival of the final fight inmininente.But I'll stick with that old and abandoned dog hosts the protagonist, played by Baskis, the same can Stallone property; and with those close-ups of an aging Rocky, Cap ready and perhaps defeated by the years and memories. And little else.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2979

Andrés Pons

Gone

muchocine

New twist to the genre of psicotriller road.

New snapshot of Australian terror following the recent success of Wolf Creek and with great parallels to is although we say that the thing ranges from other horror movies road "highway to hell, Say yes".In is occasion presents us a psychopath that falls even better than their victims. A nice, polite, charismatic type played brilliantly by the protagonist of "Scott Mechlowicz" Eurotrip. The other two British youths are also very solid in the hands of Amelia Warner "Aeon Flux" and Shaun Evans "Miss Julie".A handsome actors casting, a rule of thumb in this type of production although in is time so they are mindless Brats and have greater packaging their characters.Newcomer who comes from the world of advertising Ringan Ledwidge gives a consistency to the footage getting that we are interested in the psychology of the characters without the need to give perverse scenes, the film delves more into relationships with their unequivocal in a game to three bands. This well run by landscapes high exceptional way thanks to the good work of photography, a good soundtrack, with a good narrative gives us moments of Frank entertainment keeping expectant spectators.By alas both success and why hide it good cinema is clouded in a puzzling final part where everything happens too fast, it is as if the first part of the footage was masterfully conducted but when it comes to kill everything fades. Leaving a flavor sweet and sour of what could have been a film certainly magnifico and stays only right.