diff --git "a/token_classification/10-1016_j-molcel-2014-05-021.xml" "b/token_classification/10-1016_j-molcel-2014-05-021.xml" deleted file mode 100644--- "a/token_classification/10-1016_j-molcel-2014-05-021.xml" +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ - -

(A) HEK293A cell lines stably expressing GFP, GFP-WIPI1a, and GFP-WIPI2b were incubated in full medium (F) or starvation medium (EBSS) (S) for 2 hr before being used for GFP-TRAP pull-down.

(B) WIPI2 was immunoprecipitated from HEK293A cells treated with DSP, at the indicated concentrations, before immunoblotting.

(C) WT or Atg16L1Δ/Δ MEFs in fed medium or starved for 2 hr in EBSS were fixed and labeled with an anti-WIPI2 antibody. Scale bars, 10 μm.

(D) WIPI2 puncta in (C) were counted, and a statistical analysis of WIPI2 puncta was performed using an unpaired Student's t test. ∗p < 0.05. SEM for n = 3.

(E-H) CLEM (correlative light and electron microscopy) of endogenous WIPI2 in Atg16L1Δ/Δ MEFs.

(E) Merged phase and confocal section of Atg16L1Δ/Δ cells labeled with anti-WIPI2 antibody. Scale bar, 10 μm.

(F) Low-magnification TEM of cell in (E). Scale bar 10μm.

(G and H) High magnification of boxed regions in (E) and (F). Top box and bottom box indicate panels (G) and (H), respectively. Arrows indicate open phagophores. M, mitochondria; ER, endoplasmic reticulum. Scale bars, 1 μm (G) and 0.5 μm (H).

(I and J) 2GL9 cells (GFP-LC3 HEK293 cells; Chan et al., 2007) were starved for 2 hr before visualization using indicated antibodies. Scale bars, 10 μm.

(K) Live-cell imaging demonstrates that Atg16L1 translocates to WIPI2b-positive puncta in starvation. HEK293 cells expressing GFP-WIPI2b and mCherry-Atg16L1 were starved in EBSS and imaged every 2 s using a spinning disk microscope. See also Figure S1 and Movie S1.

(B) Untransfected (UN) or FLAG-Atg16L1 full-length (FL), 79-623, or 1-265 constructs were expressed in HEK293A cells stably expressing GFP-WIPI2b and immunoprecipitated using GFP-TRAP. Tags were visualized by immunoblotting. I, input; UB, unbound.

(C) GFP, CFP-Atg5, GFP-WIPI1a, and GFP-WIPI2b were transiently expressed in HEK293A cells. GFP-tagged proteins were isolated using GFP-TRAP and incubated with in vitro translated 35S-labeled FLAG-Atg16L1 constructs 1-265, 1-242, 1-230, and 1-207 before washing and analysis by autoradiography. Protein expression was validated by immunoblot (bottom panel).

(D) Lysates from HEK293A cells transiently expressing GFP, GFP-WIPI1a, or GFP-WIPI2b were mixed with lysates from HEK293A cells transiently expressing FLAG-Atg16L1 or Atg16L2. Protein complexes were immunoprecipitated using GFP-TRAP, followed by immunoblot. See also Figure S2 and Table S1.

(B) Lysates from HEK293A cells transfected with GFP-WIPI2b were mixed with lysates from HEK293A cells transfected with FLAG-Atg16L2, FLAG-Atg16L1, or Flag-Atg16L1 mutants, immunoprecipitated, and analyzed by immunoblotting.

(C) Statistical analysis of FLAG-Atg16L1 binding in (B) was performed by Student's t test. SEM for n = 4. ∗p < 0.05.

(D) Cell lysates from HEK293A cells transiently expressing FLAG-Atg16L2, FLAG-Atg16L1, or FLAG-Atg16L1 mutants were subjected to immunoprecipitation using FLAG M2 agarose beads. Protein complexes were analyzed using immunoblotting.

(E) Statistical analysis of FIP200 binding in (D) was performed by Student's t test. SEM for n = 3. ∗p < 0.05.

(F) WIPI2 was immunoprecipitated from lysates from WT or FIP200−/− MEFS after treatment with 0.5 mM DSP. Bound Atg16 and Atg12-5 were detected by immunoblotting.

(G) HEK293 cells stably expressing GFP-WIPI2b were and transiently transfected either FLAG-Atg16L1 WT, E226R E230R (ERER), or D237R D239R (DRDR). Bound and input (bottom) were analyzed by immunoblotting.

(A) Lysates from HEK293A cells transiently expressing GFP, GFP-WIPI1a, GFP-WIPI2a, GFP-WIPI2b, or GFP-WIPI2b FTTG mutant were used for GFP-Trap. Endogenous Atg16L1 binding was analyzed by immunoblot.

(B) Statistical analysis of (A) was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's posttest. SEM for n = 3. ∗p < 0.05.

(D) GFP-Trap from HEK293A cells transiently expressing GFP, GFP-WIPI1a, GFP-WIPI2b, GFP-WIPI2b R108E, GFP-WIPI2b R125E, or GFP-WIPI2b R108E R125E was mixed with in vitro translated 35S-labeled FLAG-Atg16L1 and analyzed by autoradiography.

(E) Lysates from HEK293A cells transiently expressing GFP, GFP-WIPI2b, GFP-WIPI2b ΔCT, GFP-WIPI2a, GFP-WIPI1a, or GFP-WIPI1a ΔCT were used for GFP-Trap. Endogenous Atg16L1 binding was analyzed by immunoblot.

(F) Statistical analysis of (E) was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's posttest. SEM for n = 2. ∗p < 0.05.

(G) Lysates from HEK293A cells transiently expressing GFP-WIPI2b WT, GFP-WIPI2b R108E, R125E, or R108E R125E were mixed with lysates from HEK293A cells transiently expressing FLAG-Atg16L1 WT, E226R, E230R, or E226R E230R in all possible permutations. Protein complexes from mixed lysates were immunoprecipitated using GFP-Trap, followed by immunoblot analysis.

(H) Statistical analysis of (G) was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's posttest. SEM from n = 3. ∗p < 0.05.

(I) CLEM analysis of HEK293 cells treated with siRNA to WIPI2 were transfected with GFP-WIPI2b RERE and starved in EBSS. Bright-field image (top), GFP-WIPI2 RERE signal (middle), TEM of selected cell (bottom). Boxed area shown in (J). Scale bars represent 10 μM for bright-field and confocal and 5 μM for TEM.

(J) High-magnification TEM of boxed area in (I). Arrows indicate open phagophores in the vicinity of ER and mitochondria (M), which contain GFP-WIPI2b RERE. See also Figures S4 and S5 and Table S1.

(A) GFP, siRNA-resistant GFP-WIPI2b, or GFP-WIPI2b RERE was expressed in HEK293A cells treated for 72 hr with either RISC-free (RF) or WIPI2 siRNA. Cells were left in full medium (F) or starved for 2 hr with EBSS (S) or EBSS with BafA (B) before immunoblot analysis.

(B) Statistical analysis of (A). SEM for n = 3. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's posttest. ∗p < 0.05.

(C) GFP, siRNA-resistant GFP-WIPI2b, GFP-WIPI2b RERE, GFP-WIPI2b FTTG, or GFP-WIPI2b FTTG RERE was expressed in HEK293A cells treated for 72 hr with WIPI2 siRNA. Cells were left in full medium (F) or starved for 2 hr with EBSS (S) or EBSS with BafA (B) before immunoblot analysis.

(D) Statistical analysis of (C) was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's posttest. The SEM for LC3 (n = 2) and p62 (n = 4) are shown. ∗p < 0.05.

(E) siRNA-resistant GFP-WIPI2b, GFP-WIPI2b RERE, GFP-WIPI2b FTTG, or GFP-WIPI2b FTTG RERE was expressed in HEK293A cells treated for 72 hr with WIPI2 siRNA. Cells were starved in EBSS for 2 hr without or with BafA, fixed, and labeled, and LC3 was visualized by confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 10 μm.

(F) Quantification of WIPI2 puncta per cell from (E). SEM from 10 cells per condition; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 using one-way ANOVA.

(G) Statistical analysis of LC3 puncta from (E) with GFP control (not shown in E). SEM for n = 3. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunn's posttest t test. ∗p < 0.05. See also Table S1.

(A) HEK293A cells transiently expressing the indicated mCherry constructs were treated in either full medium (F), starvation medium (S), or starvation medium with wortmannin (W) for 2 hr before immunoblot analysis.

(B) Statistical analysis of (A) was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. SEM for n = 3. ∗p < 0.05.

(C) Complexes from HEK293A cells transiently expressing the indicated mCherry constructs were immunoprecipitated using RFP-Trap before analysis by immunoblotting.

(D) 2GL9 cells transiently expressing the indicated mCherry constructs treated as in (A) were fixed and visualized by confocal microscopy.

(E) CLEM of MCF7 cells expressing GFP-LC3 and mCherry-WIPI2b CAAX. Bright-field and confocal image merged (left), confocal of expressing cell (middle), low-magnification TEM of cell of interest (right). Boxed area indicates plasma membrane region showing colocalization of GFP-LC3 and mCherry-WIPI2b. Scale bar, 10 μm (n = 3).

(F) High-magnification TEM showing plasma membrane region boxed in (E). Magnified insets, in top right, show small vesicular clusters under the plasma membrane detected in mCherry-WIPI2b CAAX, GFP-LC3 expressing cells but not in untransfected cells from a control experiment.

(G) HEK293A cells treated with either RISC-free (RF), Atg16L1 siRNA, or FIP200 siRNA for 72 hr before transfection with HA-WIPI2b-CAAX were incubated in full medium (F), EBSS (S), or EBSS with wortmannin (W) for 2 hr before immunoblot analysis. Please note that all WIPI2 constructs are FTTG mutants. See also Figure S6 and Table S1.

(A) Atg16L1Δ/Δ MEFs were transiently transfected with either mock, FLAG-tagged Atg16L1 WT, ERER, or DRDR. After 2 hr in EBSS, cells were fixed and labeled with anti-LC3 and anti-FLAG antibodies and visualized by confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 20 μm.

(B) Statistical analysis of (A) was performed using one-way ANOVA with Dunn's posttest. ∗p < 0.05. SEM for n = 3.

(C) Atg16L1Δ/Δ MEFs were transiently transfected with either mock, FLAG-tagged Atg16L1 WT, E226R E230R (ERER), or D237R D239R (DRDR) before analysis by immunoblotting.

(D) Statistical analysis of (C) was performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. SEM for n = 3. ∗p < 0.05.

(E) HEK293A cells were treated with either RISC-free control or WIPI2 siRNA before infection with Salmonella (moi = 100) for 1 hr, labeled with anti-LC3, WIPI2, and p62 antibodies, and followed by confocal analysis. Scale bars, 5 μm.

(F) Statistical analysis for (E) was performed using an unpaired Student's t test. ∗p < 0.05. SEM for n = 3.

(G) Atg16L1Δ/Δ MEFs were transiently transfected with FLAG-Atg16L1 WT, FLAG-Atg16L1 ERER, or FLAG-Atg16L2 DRDR 24 hr before being infected with Salmonella (moi = 25) for 1 hr, labeled with anti-LC3, anti-p62, and anti-FLAG antibodies, and followed by analysis by confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 5 μm.

(H) Statistical analysis of (G) was performed by one-way ANOVA with Dunn's post hoc test. SEM for n = 4. ∗p < 0.05. See also Figure S7.

\ No newline at end of file